Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
MapReduce >> mail # dev >> [UPDATE] Upgrade to protobuf 2.5.0 for the 2.1.0 release, HADOOP-9845


Copy link to this message
-
Re: [UPDATE] Upgrade to protobuf 2.5.0 for the 2.1.0 release, HADOOP-9845
There is no indication that protoc 2.5.0 is breaking anything.

Hadoop-trunk builds have been failing way before 1/2 way with:

-------
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin:2.12.3:test
(default-test) on project hadoop-yarn-client: ExecutionException;
nested exception is java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException:
java.lang.RuntimeException: The forked VM terminated without saying
properly goodbye. VM crash or System.exit called ? -> [Help 1]
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.LifecycleExecutionException: Failed to
execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin:2.12.3:test
(default-test) on project hadoop-yarn-client: ExecutionException;
nested exception is java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException:
java.lang.RuntimeException: The forked VM terminated without saying
properly goodbye. VM crash or System.exit called ?

-------
The Hadoop-trunk #480 build failed with a JVM abort in a testcase towards
the end of mapreduce tests.

Until then there were no failures at all.

I've increased heap size and tried a second run and the failure was earlier.

I've looked a Hadoop-trunk builds prior to the HADOOP-9845 and it has been
failing the same way in all the kept builds.

We need to fix Hadoop-trunk builds independently of this.

Any objection to commit HADOOP-9845 to branch-2 and the 2.1.0-beta branches
to get all the other jenkins jobs working?

I'll wait till tomorrow morning before proceeding.

Thx
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> Jenkins is running a full test run on trunk using protoc 2.5.0.
>
>   https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-trunk/480
>
> And it seems go be going just fine.
>
> If everything looks OK, I'm planing to backport HADOOP-9845 to the
> 2.1.0-beta branch midday PST tomorrow. This will normalize all builds
> failures do the protoc mismatch.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Alejandro
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>> shooting to get it i n for 2.1.0.
>>
>> at moment is in trunk till the nightly finishes. then we'll decide
>>
>> in the mean time, you can have multiple versions installed in diff dirs
>> and set the right one in the path
>>
>> thx
>>
>> Alejandro
>> (phone typing)
>>
>> On Aug 12, 2013, at 17:47, Konstantin Shvachko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Ok. After installing protobuf 2.5.0 I can compile trunk.
>> > But now I cannot compile Hadoop-2 branches. None of them.
>> > So if I switch between branches I need to reinstall protobuf?
>> >
>> > Is there a consensus about going towards protobuf 2.5.0 upgrade in ALL
>> > versions?
>> > I did not get definite impression there is.
>> > If not it could be a pretty big disruption.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > --Konst
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >> I've just committed HADOOP-9845 to trunk (only trunk at the moment).
>> >>
>> >> To build trunk now you need protoc 2.5.0 (the build will fail with a
>> >> warning if you don't have it).
>> >>
>> >> We'd propagate this to the 2 branches once the precommit build is back
>> to
>> >> normal and see things are OK.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> About to commit HADOOP-9845 to trunk, in 5 mins. This will make trunk
>> use
>> >>> protoc 2.5.0.
>> >>>
>> >>> thx
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Giridharan Kesavan <
>> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> I can take care of re-installing 2.4 and installing 2.5 in a
>> different
>> >>>> location. This would fix 2.0 branch builds as well.
>> >>>> Thoughts?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> -Giri
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Alejandro Abdelnur <
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> Giri,
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> first of all, thanks for installing protoc 2.5.0.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I didn't know we were installing them as the only version and not

Alejandro