Right, if you are looking into email filtering then tagging won't
help, I guess. So I guess your solution would work fine.
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 21:47, suresh srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Having the naming convention that we use helps manage emails better due to
> subject lines including "HDFS Federation". As far as tagging is concerned,
> all federation jiras are subtasks of HDFS-1052. Hence some kind of grouping
> can be done based on that.
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> JIRA has this nice feature called 'Tag'. We've been using this for
>> Herriot development - seems much cleaner than clogging synopses field
>> with additional wodking.
>> Take care,
>> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik
>> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 14:53, Todd Lipcon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Hey folks,
>> > Would those of you working on a branch mind adopting a naming convention
>> > all the federation tickets? I'm really glad to see all the changes going
>> > upstream but it's getting confusing to separate out what are bugs that
>> > to trunk vs bugs that are just due to the federation branch being in
>> > Perhaps a "Federation: " prefix for all the JIRA titles?
>> > I'm happy to go through and edit the ones that are already up.
>> > If I'm the only one that finds these confusing, feel free to tell me to
>> > shove off and just deal with it :)
>> > -Todd
>> > --
>> > Todd Lipcon
>> > Software Engineer, Cloudera