Hey folks,

Would those of you working on a branch mind adopting a naming convention for
all the federation tickets? I'm really glad to see all the changes going
upstream but it's getting confusing to separate out what are bugs that apply
to trunk vs bugs that are just due to the federation branch being in flux.

Perhaps a "Federation: " prefix for all the JIRA titles?

I'm happy to go through and edit the ones that are already up.

If I'm the only one that finds these confusing, feel free to tell me to
shove off and just deal with it :)

-Todd
--
Todd Lipcon
Software Engineer, Cloudera

+1

Looks like some of the relevant tickets are getting created with a prefix,
but not all. It'd be great if this got standardized.

--
Aaron T. Myers
Software Engineer, Cloudera

On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Todd Lipcon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hey folks,
>
> Would those of you working on a branch mind adopting a naming convention
> for
> all the federation tickets? I'm really glad to see all the changes going
> upstream but it's getting confusing to separate out what are bugs that
> apply
> to trunk vs bugs that are just due to the federation branch being in flux.
>
> Perhaps a "Federation: " prefix for all the JIRA titles?
>
> I'm happy to go through and edit the ones that are already up.
>
> If I'm the only one that finds these confusing, feel free to tell me to
> shove off and just deal with it :)
>
> -Todd
> --
> Todd Lipcon
> Software Engineer, Cloudera
>

Sounds good. We will make sure jiras created have Federation: prefix.

On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Aaron T. Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> +1
>
> Looks like some of the relevant tickets are getting created with a prefix,
> but not all. It'd be great if this got standardized.
>
> --
> Aaron T. Myers
> Software Engineer, Cloudera
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Todd Lipcon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hey folks,
> >
> > Would those of you working on a branch mind adopting a naming convention
> > for
> > all the federation tickets? I'm really glad to see all the changes going
> > upstream but it's getting confusing to separate out what are bugs that
> > apply
> > to trunk vs bugs that are just due to the federation branch being in
> flux.
> >
> > Perhaps a "Federation: " prefix for all the JIRA titles?
> >
> > I'm happy to go through and edit the ones that are already up.
> >
> > If I'm the only one that finds these confusing, feel free to tell me to
> > shove off and just deal with it :)
> >
> > -Todd
> > --
> > Todd Lipcon
> > Software Engineer, Cloudera
> >
>

--
Regards,
Suresh

Thanks Suresh!

-Todd

On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 3:40 PM, suresh srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sounds good. We will make sure jiras created have Federation: prefix.
>
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Aaron T. Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Looks like some of the relevant tickets are getting created with a prefix,
>> but not all. It'd be great if this got standardized.
>>
>> --
>> Aaron T. Myers
>> Software Engineer, Cloudera
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Todd Lipcon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > Hey folks,
>> >
>> > Would those of you working on a branch mind adopting a naming convention
>> > for
>> > all the federation tickets? I'm really glad to see all the changes going
>> > upstream but it's getting confusing to separate out what are bugs that
>> > apply
>> > to trunk vs bugs that are just due to the federation branch being in
>> flux.
>> >
>> > Perhaps a "Federation: " prefix for all the JIRA titles?
>> >
>> > I'm happy to go through and edit the ones that are already up.
>> >
>> > If I'm the only one that finds these confusing, feel free to tell me to
>> > shove off and just deal with it :)
>> >
>> > -Todd
>> > --
>> > Todd Lipcon
>> > Software Engineer, Cloudera
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Suresh
>

--
Todd Lipcon
Software Engineer, Cloudera

JIRA has this nice feature called 'Tag'. We've been using this for
Herriot development - seems much cleaner than clogging synopses field
with additional wodking.
--
  Take care,
Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik

On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 14:53, Todd Lipcon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> Would those of you working on a branch mind adopting a naming convention for
> all the federation tickets? I'm really glad to see all the changes going
> upstream but it's getting confusing to separate out what are bugs that apply
> to trunk vs bugs that are just due to the federation branch being in flux.
>
> Perhaps a "Federation: " prefix for all the JIRA titles?
>
> I'm happy to go through and edit the ones that are already up.
>
> If I'm the only one that finds these confusing, feel free to tell me to
> shove off and just deal with it :)
>
> -Todd
> --
> Todd Lipcon
> Software Engineer, Cloudera
>

Having the naming convention that we use helps manage emails better due to
subject lines including "HDFS Federation". As far as tagging is concerned,
all federation jiras are subtasks of HDFS-1052. Hence some kind of grouping
can be done based on that.

On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> JIRA has this nice feature called 'Tag'. We've been using this for
> Herriot development - seems much cleaner than clogging synopses field
> with additional wodking.
> --
>   Take care,
> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 14:53, Todd Lipcon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hey folks,
> >
> > Would those of you working on a branch mind adopting a naming convention
> for
> > all the federation tickets? I'm really glad to see all the changes going
> > upstream but it's getting confusing to separate out what are bugs that
> apply
> > to trunk vs bugs that are just due to the federation branch being in
> flux.
> >
> > Perhaps a "Federation: " prefix for all the JIRA titles?
> >
> > I'm happy to go through and edit the ones that are already up.
> >
> > If I'm the only one that finds these confusing, feel free to tell me to
> > shove off and just deal with it :)
> >
> > -Todd
> > --
> > Todd Lipcon
> > Software Engineer, Cloudera
> >
>

--
Regards,
Suresh

On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 9:47 PM, suresh srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Having the naming convention that we use helps manage emails better due to
> subject lines including "HDFS Federation". As far as tagging is concerned,
> all federation jiras are subtasks of HDFS-1052. Hence some kind of grouping
> can be done based on that.

Agreed. the fix version has also been Federation Branch which supports
searching.

-Todd
>
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> JIRA has this nice feature called 'Tag'. We've been using this for
>> Herriot development - seems much cleaner than clogging synopses field
>> with additional wodking.
>> --
>>   Take care,
>> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 14:53, Todd Lipcon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Hey folks,
>> >
>> > Would those of you working on a branch mind adopting a naming convention
>> for
>> > all the federation tickets? I'm really glad to see all the changes going
>> > upstream but it's getting confusing to separate out what are bugs that
>> apply
>> > to trunk vs bugs that are just due to the federation branch being in
>> flux.
>> >
>> > Perhaps a "Federation: " prefix for all the JIRA titles?
>> >
>> > I'm happy to go through and edit the ones that are already up.
>> >
>> > If I'm the only one that finds these confusing, feel free to tell me to
>> > shove off and just deal with it :)
>> >
>> > -Todd
>> > --
>> > Todd Lipcon
>> > Software Engineer, Cloudera
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Suresh
>

--
Todd Lipcon
Software Engineer, Cloudera

Right, if you are looking into email filtering then tagging won't
help, I guess. So I guess your solution would work fine.

On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 21:47, suresh srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Having the naming convention that we use helps manage emails better due to
> subject lines including "HDFS Federation". As far as tagging is concerned,
> all federation jiras are subtasks of HDFS-1052. Hence some kind of grouping
> can be done based on that.
>
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> JIRA has this nice feature called 'Tag'. We've been using this for
>> Herriot development - seems much cleaner than clogging synopses field
>> with additional wodking.
>> --
>>   Take care,
>> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 14:53, Todd Lipcon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Hey folks,
>> >
>> > Would those of you working on a branch mind adopting a naming convention
>> for
>> > all the federation tickets? I'm really glad to see all the changes going
>> > upstream but it's getting confusing to separate out what are bugs that
>> apply
>> > to trunk vs bugs that are just due to the federation branch being in
>> flux.
>> >
>> > Perhaps a "Federation: " prefix for all the JIRA titles?
>> >
>> > I'm happy to go through and edit the ones that are already up.
>> >
>> > If I'm the only one that finds these confusing, feel free to tell me to
>> > shove off and just deal with it :)
>> >
>> > -Todd
>> > --
>> > Todd Lipcon
>> > Software Engineer, Cloudera
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Suresh
>