The 0.8 branch has stabilized quite a bit now. We still have to look into
some corner cases and performance, but most system tests are now passing. I
think it's time to bring 0.8 back to trunk and let people start trying it.
I think we should just move trunk to an 0.7 branch and then move 0.8 to
trunk. Any objections?

Thanks,

Jun

should we do this before or after we move to git ?

On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> The 0.8 branch has stabilized quite a bit now. We still have to look into
> some corner cases and performance, but most system tests are now passing. I
> think it's time to bring 0.8 back to trunk and let people start trying it.
> I think we should just move trunk to an 0.7 branch and then move 0.8 to
> trunk. Any objections?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jun
>

--

/*
Joe Stein
http://www.linkedin.com/in/charmalloc
Twitter: @allthingshadoop <http://www.twitter.com/allthingshadoop>
*/

I think it's better if we do this before moving to git. I am thinking of
making the change next week. We likely need a new repository when we
graduate. We can probably move to git then.

Thanks,

Jun

On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 9:58 PM, Joe Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> should we do this before or after we move to git ?
>
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The 0.8 branch has stabilized quite a bit now. We still have to look into
> > some corner cases and performance, but most system tests are now
> passing. I
> > think it's time to bring 0.8 back to trunk and let people start trying
> it.
> > I think we should just move trunk to an 0.7 branch and then move 0.8 to
> > trunk. Any objections?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jun
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> /*
> Joe Stein
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/charmalloc
> Twitter: @allthingshadoop <http://www.twitter.com/allthingshadoop>
> */
>