On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 7:02 PM, Eric Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-01-03 at 12:01 -0800, Todd Lipcon wrote:
> > 80ms sounds like two round trips without SO_NODELAY. Does the socket
> > server set this socket option?
> Nope, it doesn't look like it, but I modified SocketServer and
> SocketTransceiver locally to setTcpNoDelay(true), and it didn't make any
Hm, do you have a tshark trace of the RPC conversation? Would be interesting
to see what the delay between packets looks like.
> > On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Eric Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > I'm seeing some pretty bad performance which I suspect can be
> > pinned on
> > SocketServer. What is strange here is that the transaction
> > rate I'm
> > seeing is identical regardless of the number and disposition
> > of the
> > parameters passed/returned. It's always 12.5/sec, 80ms per
> > operation.
> > I've attached a trivial example that replicates what I am
> > seeing on
> > Linux w/ OpenJDK 1.6
> > I'm happy to open a bug report, I just wanted to ping the list
> > first to
> > see if this is known issue or rings any bells.
> Eric Evans
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]