Raj N
2011-09-29, 14:28
Mahadev Konar
2011-09-29, 16:18
Ted Dunning
2011-09-29, 23:14
Dan Mihai Dumitriu
2011-09-30, 02:47
Jun Rao
2011-10-25, 19:21
Patrick Hunt
2011-10-25, 19:44
Jun Rao
2011-10-26, 05:38
Patrick Hunt
2011-10-26, 23:39
Camille Fournier
2011-10-27, 00:21
Jun Rao
2011-10-27, 16:14
Patrick Hunt
2011-10-27, 16:19
Dima Gutzeit
2011-10-27, 16:51
Mahadev Konar
2011-10-27, 16:55
Dima Gutzeit
2011-10-27, 16:58
Patrick Hunt
2011-10-27, 17:00
Dima Gutzeit
2011-10-27, 17:49
Ted Dunning
2011-10-28, 07:05
Adam Rosien
2011-11-05, 19:04
Mathias Herberts
2011-11-06, 00:26
Neha Narkhede
2011-11-06, 00:39
Mahadev Konar
2011-11-06, 00:39
Patrick Hunt
2011-11-07, 18:40
-
Zookeeper 3.4Raj N 2011-09-29, 14:28
Whats the release date for Zookeeper 3.4? I would like to use the batch
operations(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-965). Has anybody
done any benchmarking on this one? How much of a performance gain does batch
update give?
Thanks
-Raj
operations(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-965). Has anybody
done any benchmarking on this one? How much of a performance gain does batch
update give?
Thanks
-Raj
-
Re: Zookeeper 3.4Mahadev Konar 2011-09-29, 16:18
Raj,
Below is my note to dev. I would estimate the timeline within weeks
not months (probably a week or 2). For benchmarking the Multi, I'd
really encourage someone to do that and post the results to the list.
I dont think anyone has done a comprehensive perf testing on multi.
hope that helps
mahadev
Hint: you can take a lead on multi performance testing :)
-------------------------------------
Hi all,
We are very very close to getting a release candidate out. Here is an
update on some work we need to do to finish off:
Patch Availables:
ZOOKEEPER-1197: Needs a reviewer. Pat/Ben would you be able to review?
ZOOKEEPER-1174: Already committed to 3.4. Is pending commit to 3.3 branch.
ZOOKEEPER-1181: I am reviewing this. Should be done by tommorrow.
ZOOKEEPER-1203: Looks like just needs to be marked fixed.
ZOOKEEPER-1206: Will check it in tommorrow morning as soon as hudson +1's.
Open Jiras:
ZOOKEEPER-1149: Pat again you are on the hook for this :).
ZOOKEEPER-1159: Camille/Matthias, any of you want to take it up?
ZOOKEEPER-1190: Will take a look at it and will ping Eric for the fix.
ZOOKEEPER-1207: Am very inclined to punt on it. Any takers?
I am fine with saying RO feature is broken in the release.
I had planned to do an RC this week, but looks like we are close but
not there yet. Just need a final push. Really appreciate the effort
everyone is putting to get this through.
thanks
mahadev
PS: Ill be OOO from Friday until Tuesday next week.
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:28 AM, Raj N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Whats the release date for Zookeeper 3.4? I would like to use the batch
> operations(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-965). Has anybody
> done any benchmarking on this one? How much of a performance gain does batch
> update give?
>
> Thanks
> -Raj
>
Below is my note to dev. I would estimate the timeline within weeks
not months (probably a week or 2). For benchmarking the Multi, I'd
really encourage someone to do that and post the results to the list.
I dont think anyone has done a comprehensive perf testing on multi.
hope that helps
mahadev
Hint: you can take a lead on multi performance testing :)
-------------------------------------
Hi all,
We are very very close to getting a release candidate out. Here is an
update on some work we need to do to finish off:
Patch Availables:
ZOOKEEPER-1197: Needs a reviewer. Pat/Ben would you be able to review?
ZOOKEEPER-1174: Already committed to 3.4. Is pending commit to 3.3 branch.
ZOOKEEPER-1181: I am reviewing this. Should be done by tommorrow.
ZOOKEEPER-1203: Looks like just needs to be marked fixed.
ZOOKEEPER-1206: Will check it in tommorrow morning as soon as hudson +1's.
Open Jiras:
ZOOKEEPER-1149: Pat again you are on the hook for this :).
ZOOKEEPER-1159: Camille/Matthias, any of you want to take it up?
ZOOKEEPER-1190: Will take a look at it and will ping Eric for the fix.
ZOOKEEPER-1207: Am very inclined to punt on it. Any takers?
I am fine with saying RO feature is broken in the release.
I had planned to do an RC this week, but looks like we are close but
not there yet. Just need a final push. Really appreciate the effort
everyone is putting to get this through.
thanks
mahadev
PS: Ill be OOO from Friday until Tuesday next week.
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:28 AM, Raj N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Whats the release date for Zookeeper 3.4? I would like to use the batch
> operations(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-965). Has anybody
> done any benchmarking on this one? How much of a performance gain does batch
> update give?
>
> Thanks
> -Raj
>
-
Re: Zookeeper 3.4Ted Dunning 2011-09-29, 23:14
Performance was never the goal, but it might come along with the rest
because only a single round trip and single commit is required.
I would love to hear your results on this.
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Raj N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Whats the release date for Zookeeper 3.4? I would like to use the batch
> operations(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-965). Has
> anybody
> done any benchmarking on this one? How much of a performance gain does
> batch
> update give?
>
> Thanks
> -Raj
>
because only a single round trip and single commit is required.
I would love to hear your results on this.
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Raj N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Whats the release date for Zookeeper 3.4? I would like to use the batch
> operations(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-965). Has
> anybody
> done any benchmarking on this one? How much of a performance gain does
> batch
> update give?
>
> Thanks
> -Raj
>
-
Re: Zookeeper 3.4Dan Mihai Dumitriu 2011-09-30, 02:47
We are using that function now as well, not for the performance, but
for the atomicity property. It is incredibly convenient! We built
our own package, but we're definitely looking forward to the release!
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Ted Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Performance was never the goal, but it might come along with the rest
> because only a single round trip and single commit is required.
>
> I would love to hear your results on this.
>
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Raj N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Whats the release date for Zookeeper 3.4? I would like to use the batch
>> operations(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-965). Has
>> anybody
>> done any benchmarking on this one? How much of a performance gain does
>> batch
>> update give?
>>
>> Thanks
>> -Raj
>>
>
for the atomicity property. It is incredibly convenient! We built
our own package, but we're definitely looking forward to the release!
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Ted Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Performance was never the goal, but it might come along with the rest
> because only a single round trip and single commit is required.
>
> I would love to hear your results on this.
>
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Raj N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Whats the release date for Zookeeper 3.4? I would like to use the batch
>> operations(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-965). Has
>> anybody
>> done any benchmarking on this one? How much of a performance gain does
>> batch
>> update give?
>>
>> Thanks
>> -Raj
>>
>
-
Re: Zookeeper 3.4Jun Rao 2011-10-25, 19:21
Hi,
Has the release date for ZK 3.4 be determined? Thanks,
Jun
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Dan Mihai Dumitriu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> We are using that function now as well, not for the performance, but
> for the atomicity property. It is incredibly convenient! We built
> our own package, but we're definitely looking forward to the release!
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Ted Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Performance was never the goal, but it might come along with the rest
> > because only a single round trip and single commit is required.
> >
> > I would love to hear your results on this.
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Raj N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Whats the release date for Zookeeper 3.4? I would like to use the batch
> >> operations(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-965). Has
> >> anybody
> >> done any benchmarking on this one? How much of a performance gain does
> >> batch
> >> update give?
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> -Raj
> >>
> >
>
Has the release date for ZK 3.4 be determined? Thanks,
Jun
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Dan Mihai Dumitriu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> We are using that function now as well, not for the performance, but
> for the atomicity property. It is incredibly convenient! We built
> our own package, but we're definitely looking forward to the release!
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Ted Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Performance was never the goal, but it might come along with the rest
> > because only a single round trip and single commit is required.
> >
> > I would love to hear your results on this.
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Raj N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Whats the release date for Zookeeper 3.4? I would like to use the batch
> >> operations(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-965). Has
> >> anybody
> >> done any benchmarking on this one? How much of a performance gain does
> >> batch
> >> update give?
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> -Raj
> >>
> >
>
-
Re: Zookeeper 3.4Patrick Hunt 2011-10-25, 19:44
Voting is currently under way on the dev list:
http://markmail.org/message/tpqkq57kl7tcp7xn
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Has the release date for ZK 3.4 be determined? Thanks,
>
> Jun
>
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Dan Mihai Dumitriu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>> We are using that function now as well, not for the performance, but
>> for the atomicity property. It is incredibly convenient! We built
>> our own package, but we're definitely looking forward to the release!
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Ted Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> > Performance was never the goal, but it might come along with the rest
>> > because only a single round trip and single commit is required.
>> >
>> > I would love to hear your results on this.
>> >
>> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Raj N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Whats the release date for Zookeeper 3.4? I would like to use the batch
>> >> operations(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-965). Has
>> >> anybody
>> >> done any benchmarking on this one? How much of a performance gain does
>> >> batch
>> >> update give?
>> >>
>> >> Thanks
>> >> -Raj
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
http://markmail.org/message/tpqkq57kl7tcp7xn
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Has the release date for ZK 3.4 be determined? Thanks,
>
> Jun
>
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Dan Mihai Dumitriu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>> We are using that function now as well, not for the performance, but
>> for the atomicity property. It is incredibly convenient! We built
>> our own package, but we're definitely looking forward to the release!
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Ted Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> > Performance was never the goal, but it might come along with the rest
>> > because only a single round trip and single commit is required.
>> >
>> > I would love to hear your results on this.
>> >
>> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Raj N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Whats the release date for Zookeeper 3.4? I would like to use the batch
>> >> operations(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-965). Has
>> >> anybody
>> >> done any benchmarking on this one? How much of a performance gain does
>> >> batch
>> >> update give?
>> >>
>> >> Thanks
>> >> -Raj
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
-
Re: Zookeeper 3.4Jun Rao 2011-10-26, 05:38
Is there going to be a 3.3.4 release?
Thanks,
Jun
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Voting is currently under way on the dev list:
> http://markmail.org/message/tpqkq57kl7tcp7xn
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Has the release date for ZK 3.4 be determined? Thanks,
> >
> > Jun
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Dan Mihai Dumitriu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >wrote:
> >
> >> We are using that function now as well, not for the performance, but
> >> for the atomicity property. It is incredibly convenient! We built
> >> our own package, but we're definitely looking forward to the release!
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Ted Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Performance was never the goal, but it might come along with the rest
> >> > because only a single round trip and single commit is required.
> >> >
> >> > I would love to hear your results on this.
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Raj N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Whats the release date for Zookeeper 3.4? I would like to use the
> batch
> >> >> operations(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-965). Has
> >> >> anybody
> >> >> done any benchmarking on this one? How much of a performance gain
> does
> >> >> batch
> >> >> update give?
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks
> >> >> -Raj
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >
>
Thanks,
Jun
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Voting is currently under way on the dev list:
> http://markmail.org/message/tpqkq57kl7tcp7xn
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Has the release date for ZK 3.4 be determined? Thanks,
> >
> > Jun
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Dan Mihai Dumitriu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >wrote:
> >
> >> We are using that function now as well, not for the performance, but
> >> for the atomicity property. It is incredibly convenient! We built
> >> our own package, but we're definitely looking forward to the release!
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Ted Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Performance was never the goal, but it might come along with the rest
> >> > because only a single round trip and single commit is required.
> >> >
> >> > I would love to hear your results on this.
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Raj N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Whats the release date for Zookeeper 3.4? I would like to use the
> batch
> >> >> operations(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-965). Has
> >> >> anybody
> >> >> done any benchmarking on this one? How much of a performance gain
> does
> >> >> batch
> >> >> update give?
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks
> >> >> -Raj
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >
>
-
Re: Zookeeper 3.4Patrick Hunt 2011-10-26, 23:39
I've offered but no one showed any interest. I personally think we
should have one/more, including the most important fixes until 3.4.x
code line has stabilized for production use.
Patrick
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there going to be a 3.3.4 release?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jun
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Voting is currently under way on the dev list:
>> http://markmail.org/message/tpqkq57kl7tcp7xn
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Has the release date for ZK 3.4 be determined? Thanks,
>> >
>> > Jun
>> >
>> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Dan Mihai Dumitriu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >> We are using that function now as well, not for the performance, but
>> >> for the atomicity property. It is incredibly convenient! We built
>> >> our own package, but we're definitely looking forward to the release!
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Ted Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > Performance was never the goal, but it might come along with the rest
>> >> > because only a single round trip and single commit is required.
>> >> >
>> >> > I would love to hear your results on this.
>> >> >
>> >> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Raj N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Whats the release date for Zookeeper 3.4? I would like to use the
>> batch
>> >> >> operations(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-965). Has
>> >> >> anybody
>> >> >> done any benchmarking on this one? How much of a performance gain
>> does
>> >> >> batch
>> >> >> update give?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thanks
>> >> >> -Raj
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
should have one/more, including the most important fixes until 3.4.x
code line has stabilized for production use.
Patrick
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there going to be a 3.3.4 release?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jun
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Voting is currently under way on the dev list:
>> http://markmail.org/message/tpqkq57kl7tcp7xn
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Has the release date for ZK 3.4 be determined? Thanks,
>> >
>> > Jun
>> >
>> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Dan Mihai Dumitriu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >> We are using that function now as well, not for the performance, but
>> >> for the atomicity property. It is incredibly convenient! We built
>> >> our own package, but we're definitely looking forward to the release!
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Ted Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > Performance was never the goal, but it might come along with the rest
>> >> > because only a single round trip and single commit is required.
>> >> >
>> >> > I would love to hear your results on this.
>> >> >
>> >> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Raj N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Whats the release date for Zookeeper 3.4? I would like to use the
>> batch
>> >> >> operations(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-965). Has
>> >> >> anybody
>> >> >> done any benchmarking on this one? How much of a performance gain
>> does
>> >> >> batch
>> >> >> update give?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thanks
>> >> >> -Raj
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
-
Re: Zookeeper 3.4Camille Fournier 2011-10-27, 00:21
Let me express interest! I did back-port a number of patches into the
3.3 branch.
C
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've offered but no one showed any interest. I personally think we
> should have one/more, including the most important fixes until 3.4.x
> code line has stabilized for production use.
>
> Patrick
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Is there going to be a 3.3.4 release?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Jun
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Voting is currently under way on the dev list:
>>> http://markmail.org/message/tpqkq57kl7tcp7xn
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > Has the release date for ZK 3.4 be determined? Thanks,
>>> >
>>> > Jun
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Dan Mihai Dumitriu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> >wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> We are using that function now as well, not for the performance, but
>>> >> for the atomicity property. It is incredibly convenient! We built
>>> >> our own package, but we're definitely looking forward to the release!
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Ted Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >> > Performance was never the goal, but it might come along with the rest
>>> >> > because only a single round trip and single commit is required.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > I would love to hear your results on this.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Raj N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> >> Whats the release date for Zookeeper 3.4? I would like to use the
>>> batch
>>> >> >> operations(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-965). Has
>>> >> >> anybody
>>> >> >> done any benchmarking on this one? How much of a performance gain
>>> does
>>> >> >> batch
>>> >> >> update give?
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Thanks
>>> >> >> -Raj
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >
>>>
>>
>
3.3 branch.
C
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've offered but no one showed any interest. I personally think we
> should have one/more, including the most important fixes until 3.4.x
> code line has stabilized for production use.
>
> Patrick
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Is there going to be a 3.3.4 release?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Jun
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Voting is currently under way on the dev list:
>>> http://markmail.org/message/tpqkq57kl7tcp7xn
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > Has the release date for ZK 3.4 be determined? Thanks,
>>> >
>>> > Jun
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Dan Mihai Dumitriu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> >wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> We are using that function now as well, not for the performance, but
>>> >> for the atomicity property. It is incredibly convenient! We built
>>> >> our own package, but we're definitely looking forward to the release!
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Ted Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >> > Performance was never the goal, but it might come along with the rest
>>> >> > because only a single round trip and single commit is required.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > I would love to hear your results on this.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Raj N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> >> Whats the release date for Zookeeper 3.4? I would like to use the
>>> batch
>>> >> >> operations(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-965). Has
>>> >> >> anybody
>>> >> >> done any benchmarking on this one? How much of a performance gain
>>> does
>>> >> >> batch
>>> >> >> update give?
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Thanks
>>> >> >> -Raj
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >
>>>
>>
>
-
Re: Zookeeper 3.4Jun Rao 2011-10-27, 16:14
I'd like to have a 3.3.4 release too, especially for addressing the chroot
issue (ZOOKEEPER-961). We have seen several Kafka users complaining about
the chroot issue in ZK.
Thanks,
Jun
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've offered but no one showed any interest. I personally think we
> should have one/more, including the most important fixes until 3.4.x
> code line has stabilized for production use.
>
> Patrick
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is there going to be a 3.3.4 release?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jun
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Voting is currently under way on the dev list:
> >> http://markmail.org/message/tpqkq57kl7tcp7xn
> >>
> >> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > Has the release date for ZK 3.4 be determined? Thanks,
> >> >
> >> > Jun
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Dan Mihai Dumitriu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> We are using that function now as well, not for the performance, but
> >> >> for the atomicity property. It is incredibly convenient! We built
> >> >> our own package, but we're definitely looking forward to the release!
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Ted Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> > Performance was never the goal, but it might come along with the
> rest
> >> >> > because only a single round trip and single commit is required.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I would love to hear your results on this.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Raj N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Whats the release date for Zookeeper 3.4? I would like to use the
> >> batch
> >> >> >> operations(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-965).
> Has
> >> >> >> anybody
> >> >> >> done any benchmarking on this one? How much of a performance gain
> >> does
> >> >> >> batch
> >> >> >> update give?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Thanks
> >> >> >> -Raj
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >
>
issue (ZOOKEEPER-961). We have seen several Kafka users complaining about
the chroot issue in ZK.
Thanks,
Jun
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've offered but no one showed any interest. I personally think we
> should have one/more, including the most important fixes until 3.4.x
> code line has stabilized for production use.
>
> Patrick
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is there going to be a 3.3.4 release?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jun
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Voting is currently under way on the dev list:
> >> http://markmail.org/message/tpqkq57kl7tcp7xn
> >>
> >> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > Has the release date for ZK 3.4 be determined? Thanks,
> >> >
> >> > Jun
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Dan Mihai Dumitriu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> We are using that function now as well, not for the performance, but
> >> >> for the atomicity property. It is incredibly convenient! We built
> >> >> our own package, but we're definitely looking forward to the release!
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Ted Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> > Performance was never the goal, but it might come along with the
> rest
> >> >> > because only a single round trip and single commit is required.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I would love to hear your results on this.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Raj N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Whats the release date for Zookeeper 3.4? I would like to use the
> >> batch
> >> >> >> operations(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-965).
> Has
> >> >> >> anybody
> >> >> >> done any benchmarking on this one? How much of a performance gain
> >> does
> >> >> >> batch
> >> >> >> update give?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Thanks
> >> >> >> -Raj
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >
>
-
Re: Zookeeper 3.4Patrick Hunt 2011-10-27, 16:19
Great, I'll propose a 3.3.4 release to the PMC, with myself as RM.
Patrick
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to have a 3.3.4 release too, especially for addressing the chroot
> issue (ZOOKEEPER-961). We have seen several Kafka users complaining about
> the chroot issue in ZK.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jun
>
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I've offered but no one showed any interest. I personally think we
>> should have one/more, including the most important fixes until 3.4.x
>> code line has stabilized for production use.
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Is there going to be a 3.3.4 release?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Jun
>> >
>> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Voting is currently under way on the dev list:
>> >> http://markmail.org/message/tpqkq57kl7tcp7xn
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> > Hi,
>> >> >
>> >> > Has the release date for ZK 3.4 be determined? Thanks,
>> >> >
>> >> > Jun
>> >> >
>> >> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Dan Mihai Dumitriu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> We are using that function now as well, not for the performance, but
>> >> >> for the atomicity property. It is incredibly convenient! We built
>> >> >> our own package, but we're definitely looking forward to the release!
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Ted Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> > Performance was never the goal, but it might come along with the
>> rest
>> >> >> > because only a single round trip and single commit is required.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I would love to hear your results on this.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Raj N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> Whats the release date for Zookeeper 3.4? I would like to use the
>> >> batch
>> >> >> >> operations(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-965).
>> Has
>> >> >> >> anybody
>> >> >> >> done any benchmarking on this one? How much of a performance gain
>> >> does
>> >> >> >> batch
>> >> >> >> update give?
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Thanks
>> >> >> >> -Raj
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
Patrick
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to have a 3.3.4 release too, especially for addressing the chroot
> issue (ZOOKEEPER-961). We have seen several Kafka users complaining about
> the chroot issue in ZK.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jun
>
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I've offered but no one showed any interest. I personally think we
>> should have one/more, including the most important fixes until 3.4.x
>> code line has stabilized for production use.
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Is there going to be a 3.3.4 release?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Jun
>> >
>> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Voting is currently under way on the dev list:
>> >> http://markmail.org/message/tpqkq57kl7tcp7xn
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> > Hi,
>> >> >
>> >> > Has the release date for ZK 3.4 be determined? Thanks,
>> >> >
>> >> > Jun
>> >> >
>> >> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Dan Mihai Dumitriu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> We are using that function now as well, not for the performance, but
>> >> >> for the atomicity property. It is incredibly convenient! We built
>> >> >> our own package, but we're definitely looking forward to the release!
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Ted Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> > Performance was never the goal, but it might come along with the
>> rest
>> >> >> > because only a single round trip and single commit is required.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I would love to hear your results on this.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Raj N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> Whats the release date for Zookeeper 3.4? I would like to use the
>> >> batch
>> >> >> >> operations(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-965).
>> Has
>> >> >> >> anybody
>> >> >> >> done any benchmarking on this one? How much of a performance gain
>> >> does
>> >> >> >> batch
>> >> >> >> update give?
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Thanks
>> >> >> >> -Raj
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
-
Re: Zookeeper 3.4Dima Gutzeit 2011-10-27, 16:51
Can we have batch operation as well included in that release ?
Regards,
Dima Gutzeit.
Sent from my iPhone
On 27 באוק 2011, at 18:20, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Great, I'll propose a 3.3.4 release to the PMC, with myself as RM.
>
> Patrick
>
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'd like to have a 3.3.4 release too, especially for addressing the chroot
>> issue (ZOOKEEPER-961). We have seen several Kafka users complaining about
>> the chroot issue in ZK.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Jun
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> I've offered but no one showed any interest. I personally think we
>>> should have one/more, including the most important fixes until 3.4.x
>>> code line has stabilized for production use.
>>>
>>> Patrick
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> Is there going to be a 3.3.4 release?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Jun
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Voting is currently under way on the dev list:
>>>>> http://markmail.org/message/tpqkq57kl7tcp7xn
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Has the release date for ZK 3.4 be determined? Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jun
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Dan Mihai Dumitriu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We are using that function now as well, not for the performance, but
>>>>>>> for the atomicity property. It is incredibly convenient! We built
>>>>>>> our own package, but we're definitely looking forward to the release!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Ted Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Performance was never the goal, but it might come along with the
>>> rest
>>>>>>>> because only a single round trip and single commit is required.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I would love to hear your results on this.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Raj N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Whats the release date for Zookeeper 3.4? I would like to use the
>>>>> batch
>>>>>>>>> operations(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-965).
>>> Has
>>>>>>>>> anybody
>>>>>>>>> done any benchmarking on this one? How much of a performance gain
>>>>> does
>>>>>>>>> batch
>>>>>>>>> update give?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>> -Raj
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
Regards,
Dima Gutzeit.
Sent from my iPhone
On 27 באוק 2011, at 18:20, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Great, I'll propose a 3.3.4 release to the PMC, with myself as RM.
>
> Patrick
>
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'd like to have a 3.3.4 release too, especially for addressing the chroot
>> issue (ZOOKEEPER-961). We have seen several Kafka users complaining about
>> the chroot issue in ZK.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Jun
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> I've offered but no one showed any interest. I personally think we
>>> should have one/more, including the most important fixes until 3.4.x
>>> code line has stabilized for production use.
>>>
>>> Patrick
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> Is there going to be a 3.3.4 release?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Jun
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Voting is currently under way on the dev list:
>>>>> http://markmail.org/message/tpqkq57kl7tcp7xn
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Has the release date for ZK 3.4 be determined? Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jun
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Dan Mihai Dumitriu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We are using that function now as well, not for the performance, but
>>>>>>> for the atomicity property. It is incredibly convenient! We built
>>>>>>> our own package, but we're definitely looking forward to the release!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Ted Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Performance was never the goal, but it might come along with the
>>> rest
>>>>>>>> because only a single round trip and single commit is required.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I would love to hear your results on this.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Raj N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Whats the release date for Zookeeper 3.4? I would like to use the
>>>>> batch
>>>>>>>>> operations(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-965).
>>> Has
>>>>>>>>> anybody
>>>>>>>>> done any benchmarking on this one? How much of a performance gain
>>>>> does
>>>>>>>>> batch
>>>>>>>>> update give?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>> -Raj
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
-
Re: Zookeeper 3.4Mahadev Konar 2011-10-27, 16:55
Dima,
Batch is a new feature and touches a lot of the critical code and
isnt system tested. I dont think it would be advisable to include into
a stable bugfix release for now. What do others feel abt it?
thanks
mahadev
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Dima Gutzeit
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can we have batch operation as well included in that release ?
>
> Regards,
> Dima Gutzeit.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 27 באוק 2011, at 18:20, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Great, I'll propose a 3.3.4 release to the PMC, with myself as RM.
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I'd like to have a 3.3.4 release too, especially for addressing the chroot
>>> issue (ZOOKEEPER-961). We have seen several Kafka users complaining about
>>> the chroot issue in ZK.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Jun
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I've offered but no one showed any interest. I personally think we
>>>> should have one/more, including the most important fixes until 3.4.x
>>>> code line has stabilized for production use.
>>>>
>>>> Patrick
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>> Is there going to be a 3.3.4 release?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Jun
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Voting is currently under way on the dev list:
>>>>>> http://markmail.org/message/tpqkq57kl7tcp7xn
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Has the release date for ZK 3.4 be determined? Thanks,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jun
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Dan Mihai Dumitriu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We are using that function now as well, not for the performance, but
>>>>>>>> for the atomicity property. It is incredibly convenient! ��We built
>>>>>>>> our own package, but we're definitely looking forward to the release!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Ted Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Performance was never the goal, but it might come along with the
>>>> rest
>>>>>>>>> because only a single round trip and single commit is required.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I would love to hear your results on this.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Raj N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Whats the release date for Zookeeper 3.4? I would like to use the
>>>>>> batch
>>>>>>>>>> operations(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-965).
>>>> Has
>>>>>>>>>> anybody
>>>>>>>>>> done any benchmarking on this one? How much of a performance gain
>>>>>> does
>>>>>>>>>> batch
>>>>>>>>>> update give?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>> -Raj
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>
Batch is a new feature and touches a lot of the critical code and
isnt system tested. I dont think it would be advisable to include into
a stable bugfix release for now. What do others feel abt it?
thanks
mahadev
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Dima Gutzeit
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can we have batch operation as well included in that release ?
>
> Regards,
> Dima Gutzeit.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 27 באוק 2011, at 18:20, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Great, I'll propose a 3.3.4 release to the PMC, with myself as RM.
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I'd like to have a 3.3.4 release too, especially for addressing the chroot
>>> issue (ZOOKEEPER-961). We have seen several Kafka users complaining about
>>> the chroot issue in ZK.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Jun
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I've offered but no one showed any interest. I personally think we
>>>> should have one/more, including the most important fixes until 3.4.x
>>>> code line has stabilized for production use.
>>>>
>>>> Patrick
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>> Is there going to be a 3.3.4 release?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Jun
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Voting is currently under way on the dev list:
>>>>>> http://markmail.org/message/tpqkq57kl7tcp7xn
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Has the release date for ZK 3.4 be determined? Thanks,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jun
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Dan Mihai Dumitriu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We are using that function now as well, not for the performance, but
>>>>>>>> for the atomicity property. It is incredibly convenient! ��We built
>>>>>>>> our own package, but we're definitely looking forward to the release!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Ted Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Performance was never the goal, but it might come along with the
>>>> rest
>>>>>>>>> because only a single round trip and single commit is required.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I would love to hear your results on this.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Raj N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Whats the release date for Zookeeper 3.4? I would like to use the
>>>>>> batch
>>>>>>>>>> operations(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-965).
>>>> Has
>>>>>>>>>> anybody
>>>>>>>>>> done any benchmarking on this one? How much of a performance gain
>>>>>> does
>>>>>>>>>> batch
>>>>>>>>>> update give?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>> -Raj
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>
-
Re: Zookeeper 3.4Dima Gutzeit 2011-10-27, 16:58
Are there other major developments pending for 3.4 release ?
Regards,
Dima Gutzeit.
Sent from my iPhone
On 27 באוק 2011, at 18:55, Mahadev Konar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dima,
> Batch is a new feature and touches a lot of the critical code and
> isnt system tested. I dont think it would be advisable to include into
> a stable bugfix release for now. What do others feel abt it?
>
> thanks
> mahadev
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Dima Gutzeit
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Can we have batch operation as well included in that release ?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Dima Gutzeit.
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On 27 באוק 2011, at 18:20, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Great, I'll propose a 3.3.4 release to the PMC, with myself as RM.
>>>
>>> Patrick
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> I'd like to have a 3.3.4 release too, especially for addressing the chroot
>>>> issue (ZOOKEEPER-961). We have seen several Kafka users complaining about
>>>> the chroot issue in ZK.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Jun
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I've offered but no one showed any interest. I personally think we
>>>>> should have one/more, including the most important fixes until 3.4.x
>>>>> code line has stabilized for production use.
>>>>>
>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>> Is there going to be a 3.3.4 release?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jun
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Voting is currently under way on the dev list:
>>>>>>> http://markmail.org/message/tpqkq57kl7tcp7xn
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Has the release date for ZK 3.4 be determined? Thanks,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jun
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Dan Mihai Dumitriu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We are using that function now as well, not for the performance, but
>>>>>>>>> for the atomicity property. It is incredibly convenient! We built
>>>>>>>>> our own package, but we're definitely looking forward to the release!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Ted Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Performance was never the goal, but it might come along with the
>>>>> rest
>>>>>>>>>> because only a single round trip and single commit is required.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I would love to hear your results on this.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Raj N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Whats the release date for Zookeeper 3.4? I would like to use the
>>>>>>> batch
>>>>>>>>>>> operations(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-965).
>>>>> Has
>>>>>>>>>>> anybody
>>>>>>>>>>> done any benchmarking on this one? How much of a performance gain
>>>>>>> does
>>>>>>>>>>> batch
>>>>>>>>>>> update give?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>>> -Raj
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
Regards,
Dima Gutzeit.
Sent from my iPhone
On 27 באוק 2011, at 18:55, Mahadev Konar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dima,
> Batch is a new feature and touches a lot of the critical code and
> isnt system tested. I dont think it would be advisable to include into
> a stable bugfix release for now. What do others feel abt it?
>
> thanks
> mahadev
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Dima Gutzeit
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Can we have batch operation as well included in that release ?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Dima Gutzeit.
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On 27 באוק 2011, at 18:20, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Great, I'll propose a 3.3.4 release to the PMC, with myself as RM.
>>>
>>> Patrick
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> I'd like to have a 3.3.4 release too, especially for addressing the chroot
>>>> issue (ZOOKEEPER-961). We have seen several Kafka users complaining about
>>>> the chroot issue in ZK.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Jun
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I've offered but no one showed any interest. I personally think we
>>>>> should have one/more, including the most important fixes until 3.4.x
>>>>> code line has stabilized for production use.
>>>>>
>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>> Is there going to be a 3.3.4 release?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jun
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Voting is currently under way on the dev list:
>>>>>>> http://markmail.org/message/tpqkq57kl7tcp7xn
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Has the release date for ZK 3.4 be determined? Thanks,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jun
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Dan Mihai Dumitriu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We are using that function now as well, not for the performance, but
>>>>>>>>> for the atomicity property. It is incredibly convenient! We built
>>>>>>>>> our own package, but we're definitely looking forward to the release!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Ted Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Performance was never the goal, but it might come along with the
>>>>> rest
>>>>>>>>>> because only a single round trip and single commit is required.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I would love to hear your results on this.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Raj N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Whats the release date for Zookeeper 3.4? I would like to use the
>>>>>>> batch
>>>>>>>>>>> operations(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-965).
>>>>> Has
>>>>>>>>>>> anybody
>>>>>>>>>>> done any benchmarking on this one? How much of a performance gain
>>>>>>> does
>>>>>>>>>>> batch
>>>>>>>>>>> update give?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>>> -Raj
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
-
Re: Zookeeper 3.4Patrick Hunt 2011-10-27, 17:00
No. Fixes only in fix releases.
Patrick
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Dima Gutzeit
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can we have batch operation as well included in that release ?
>
> Regards,
> Dima Gutzeit.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 27 באוק 2011, at 18:20, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Great, I'll propose a 3.3.4 release to the PMC, with myself as RM.
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I'd like to have a 3.3.4 release too, especially for addressing the chroot
>>> issue (ZOOKEEPER-961). We have seen several Kafka users complaining about
>>> the chroot issue in ZK.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Jun
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I've offered but no one showed any interest. I personally think we
>>>> should have one/more, including the most important fixes until 3.4.x
>>>> code line has stabilized for production use.
>>>>
>>>> Patrick
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>> Is there going to be a 3.3.4 release?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Jun
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Voting is currently under way on the dev list:
>>>>>> http://markmail.org/message/tpqkq57kl7tcp7xn
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Has the release date for ZK 3.4 be determined? Thanks,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jun
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Dan Mihai Dumitriu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We are using that function now as well, not for the performance, but
>>>>>>>> for the atomicity property. It is incredibly convenient! ��We built
>>>>>>>> our own package, but we're definitely looking forward to the release!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Ted Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Performance was never the goal, but it might come along with the
>>>> rest
>>>>>>>>> because only a single round trip and single commit is required.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I would love to hear your results on this.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Raj N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Whats the release date for Zookeeper 3.4? I would like to use the
>>>>>> batch
>>>>>>>>>> operations(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-965).
>>>> Has
>>>>>>>>>> anybody
>>>>>>>>>> done any benchmarking on this one? How much of a performance gain
>>>>>> does
>>>>>>>>>> batch
>>>>>>>>>> update give?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>> -Raj
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>
Patrick
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Dima Gutzeit
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can we have batch operation as well included in that release ?
>
> Regards,
> Dima Gutzeit.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 27 באוק 2011, at 18:20, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Great, I'll propose a 3.3.4 release to the PMC, with myself as RM.
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I'd like to have a 3.3.4 release too, especially for addressing the chroot
>>> issue (ZOOKEEPER-961). We have seen several Kafka users complaining about
>>> the chroot issue in ZK.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Jun
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I've offered but no one showed any interest. I personally think we
>>>> should have one/more, including the most important fixes until 3.4.x
>>>> code line has stabilized for production use.
>>>>
>>>> Patrick
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>> Is there going to be a 3.3.4 release?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Jun
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Voting is currently under way on the dev list:
>>>>>> http://markmail.org/message/tpqkq57kl7tcp7xn
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Has the release date for ZK 3.4 be determined? Thanks,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jun
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Dan Mihai Dumitriu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We are using that function now as well, not for the performance, but
>>>>>>>> for the atomicity property. It is incredibly convenient! ��We built
>>>>>>>> our own package, but we're definitely looking forward to the release!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Ted Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Performance was never the goal, but it might come along with the
>>>> rest
>>>>>>>>> because only a single round trip and single commit is required.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I would love to hear your results on this.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Raj N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Whats the release date for Zookeeper 3.4? I would like to use the
>>>>>> batch
>>>>>>>>>> operations(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-965).
>>>> Has
>>>>>>>>>> anybody
>>>>>>>>>> done any benchmarking on this one? How much of a performance gain
>>>>>> does
>>>>>>>>>> batch
>>>>>>>>>> update give?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>> -Raj
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>
-
Re: Zookeeper 3.4Dima Gutzeit 2011-10-27, 17:49
+1 for the interest.
Regards ,
Dima Gutzeit.
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 2:21 AM, Camille Fournier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Let me express interest! I did back-port a number of patches into the
> 3.3 branch.
>
> C
>
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've offered but no one showed any interest. I personally think we
> > should have one/more, including the most important fixes until 3.4.x
> > code line has stabilized for production use.
> >
> > Patrick
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Is there going to be a 3.3.4 release?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Jun
> >>
> >> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Voting is currently under way on the dev list:
> >>> http://markmail.org/message/tpqkq57kl7tcp7xn
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> > Hi,
> >>> >
> >>> > Has the release date for ZK 3.4 be determined? Thanks,
> >>> >
> >>> > Jun
> >>> >
> >>> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Dan Mihai Dumitriu <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> >wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >> We are using that function now as well, not for the performance, but
> >>> >> for the atomicity property. It is incredibly convenient! We built
> >>> >> our own package, but we're definitely looking forward to the
> release!
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Ted Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >>> >> wrote:
> >>> >> > Performance was never the goal, but it might come along with the
> rest
> >>> >> > because only a single round trip and single commit is required.
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > I would love to hear your results on this.
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Raj N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >> Whats the release date for Zookeeper 3.4? I would like to use the
> >>> batch
> >>> >> >> operations(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-965).
> Has
> >>> >> >> anybody
> >>> >> >> done any benchmarking on this one? How much of a performance gain
> >>> does
> >>> >> >> batch
> >>> >> >> update give?
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> Thanks
> >>> >> >> -Raj
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >
> >>> >>
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
Regards ,
Dima Gutzeit.
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 2:21 AM, Camille Fournier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Let me express interest! I did back-port a number of patches into the
> 3.3 branch.
>
> C
>
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've offered but no one showed any interest. I personally think we
> > should have one/more, including the most important fixes until 3.4.x
> > code line has stabilized for production use.
> >
> > Patrick
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Is there going to be a 3.3.4 release?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Jun
> >>
> >> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Voting is currently under way on the dev list:
> >>> http://markmail.org/message/tpqkq57kl7tcp7xn
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> > Hi,
> >>> >
> >>> > Has the release date for ZK 3.4 be determined? Thanks,
> >>> >
> >>> > Jun
> >>> >
> >>> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Dan Mihai Dumitriu <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> >wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >> We are using that function now as well, not for the performance, but
> >>> >> for the atomicity property. It is incredibly convenient! We built
> >>> >> our own package, but we're definitely looking forward to the
> release!
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Ted Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >>> >> wrote:
> >>> >> > Performance was never the goal, but it might come along with the
> rest
> >>> >> > because only a single round trip and single commit is required.
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > I would love to hear your results on this.
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Raj N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >> Whats the release date for Zookeeper 3.4? I would like to use the
> >>> batch
> >>> >> >> operations(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-965).
> Has
> >>> >> >> anybody
> >>> >> >> done any benchmarking on this one? How much of a performance gain
> >>> does
> >>> >> >> batch
> >>> >> >> update give?
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> Thanks
> >>> >> >> -Raj
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >
> >>> >>
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
-
Re: Zookeeper 3.4Ted Dunning 2011-10-28, 07:05
+1 for fixes only in fix releases.
Batch is an api change and needs to version change signal.
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Mahadev Konar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Dima,
> Batch is a new feature and touches a lot of the critical code and
> isnt system tested. I dont think it would be advisable to include into
> a stable bugfix release for now. What do others feel abt it?
>
> thanks
> mahadev
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Dima Gutzeit
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Can we have batch operation as well included in that release ?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Dima Gutzeit.
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> > On 27 באוק 2011, at 18:20, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Great, I'll propose a 3.3.4 release to the PMC, with myself as RM.
> >>
> >> Patrick
> >>
> >> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> I'd like to have a 3.3.4 release too, especially for addressing the
> chroot
> >>> issue (ZOOKEEPER-961). We have seen several Kafka users complaining
> about
> >>> the chroot issue in ZK.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> Jun
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I've offered but no one showed any interest. I personally think we
> >>>> should have one/more, including the most important fixes until 3.4.x
> >>>> code line has stabilized for production use.
> >>>>
> >>>> Patrick
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>> Is there going to be a 3.3.4 release?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Jun
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Voting is currently under way on the dev list:
> >>>>>> http://markmail.org/message/tpqkq57kl7tcp7xn
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Has the release date for ZK 3.4 be determined? Thanks,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Jun
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Dan Mihai Dumitriu <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> We are using that function now as well, not for the performance,
> but
> >>>>>>>> for the atomicity property. It is incredibly convenient! We
> built
> >>>>>>>> our own package, but we're definitely looking forward to the
> release!
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Ted Dunning <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Performance was never the goal, but it might come along with the
> >>>> rest
> >>>>>>>>> because only a single round trip and single commit is required.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I would love to hear your results on this.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Raj N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Whats the release date for Zookeeper 3.4? I would like to use
> the
> >>>>>> batch
> >>>>>>>>>> operations(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-965
> ).
> >>>> Has
> >>>>>>>>>> anybody
> >>>>>>>>>> done any benchmarking on this one? How much of a performance
> gain
> >>>>>> does
> >>>>>>>>>> batch
> >>>>>>>>>> update give?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks
> >>>>>>>>>> -Raj
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >
>
Batch is an api change and needs to version change signal.
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Mahadev Konar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Dima,
> Batch is a new feature and touches a lot of the critical code and
> isnt system tested. I dont think it would be advisable to include into
> a stable bugfix release for now. What do others feel abt it?
>
> thanks
> mahadev
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Dima Gutzeit
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Can we have batch operation as well included in that release ?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Dima Gutzeit.
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> > On 27 באוק 2011, at 18:20, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Great, I'll propose a 3.3.4 release to the PMC, with myself as RM.
> >>
> >> Patrick
> >>
> >> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> I'd like to have a 3.3.4 release too, especially for addressing the
> chroot
> >>> issue (ZOOKEEPER-961). We have seen several Kafka users complaining
> about
> >>> the chroot issue in ZK.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> Jun
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I've offered but no one showed any interest. I personally think we
> >>>> should have one/more, including the most important fixes until 3.4.x
> >>>> code line has stabilized for production use.
> >>>>
> >>>> Patrick
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>> Is there going to be a 3.3.4 release?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Jun
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Voting is currently under way on the dev list:
> >>>>>> http://markmail.org/message/tpqkq57kl7tcp7xn
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Has the release date for ZK 3.4 be determined? Thanks,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Jun
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Dan Mihai Dumitriu <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> We are using that function now as well, not for the performance,
> but
> >>>>>>>> for the atomicity property. It is incredibly convenient! We
> built
> >>>>>>>> our own package, but we're definitely looking forward to the
> release!
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Ted Dunning <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Performance was never the goal, but it might come along with the
> >>>> rest
> >>>>>>>>> because only a single round trip and single commit is required.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I would love to hear your results on this.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Raj N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Whats the release date for Zookeeper 3.4? I would like to use
> the
> >>>>>> batch
> >>>>>>>>>> operations(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-965
> ).
> >>>> Has
> >>>>>>>>>> anybody
> >>>>>>>>>> done any benchmarking on this one? How much of a performance
> gain
> >>>>>> does
> >>>>>>>>>> batch
> >>>>>>>>>> update give?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks
> >>>>>>>>>> -Raj
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >
>
-
Re: Zookeeper 3.4Adam Rosien 2011-11-05, 19:04
+1 for the chroot fix! Need it bad!
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:05 AM, Ted Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 for fixes only in fix releases.
>
> Batch is an api change and needs to version change signal.
>
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Mahadev Konar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >wrote:
>
> > Dima,
> > Batch is a new feature and touches a lot of the critical code and
> > isnt system tested. I dont think it would be advisable to include into
> > a stable bugfix release for now. What do others feel abt it?
> >
> > thanks
> > mahadev
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Dima Gutzeit
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Can we have batch operation as well included in that release ?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Dima Gutzeit.
> > >
> > > Sent from my iPhone
> > >
> > > On 27 באוק 2011, at 18:20, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Great, I'll propose a 3.3.4 release to the PMC, with myself as RM.
> > >>
> > >> Patrick
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>> I'd like to have a 3.3.4 release too, especially for addressing the
> > chroot
> > >>> issue (ZOOKEEPER-961). We have seen several Kafka users complaining
> > about
> > >>> the chroot issue in ZK.
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks,
> > >>>
> > >>> Jun
> > >>>
> > >>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> I've offered but no one showed any interest. I personally think we
> > >>>> should have one/more, including the most important fixes until 3.4.x
> > >>>> code line has stabilized for production use.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Patrick
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>>>> Is there going to be a 3.3.4 release?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Jun
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> Voting is currently under way on the dev list:
> > >>>>>> http://markmail.org/message/tpqkq57kl7tcp7xn
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >>>>>>> Hi,
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Has the release date for ZK 3.4 be determined? Thanks,
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Jun
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Dan Mihai Dumitriu <
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> We are using that function now as well, not for the performance,
> > but
> > >>>>>>>> for the atomicity property. It is incredibly convenient! We
> > built
> > >>>>>>>> our own package, but we're definitely looking forward to the
> > release!
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Ted Dunning <
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>> Performance was never the goal, but it might come along with
> the
> > >>>> rest
> > >>>>>>>>> because only a single round trip and single commit is required.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> I would love to hear your results on this.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Raj N <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Whats the release date for Zookeeper 3.4? I would like to use
> > the
> > >>>>>> batch
> > >>>>>>>>>> operations(
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-965
> > ).
> > >>>> Has
> > >>>>>>>>>> anybody
> > >>>>>>>>>> done any benchmarking on this one? How much of a performance
> > gain
> > >>>>>> does
> > >>>>>>>>>> batch
> > >>>>>>>>>> update give?
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks
> > >>>>>>>>>> -Raj
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >
> >
>
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:05 AM, Ted Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 for fixes only in fix releases.
>
> Batch is an api change and needs to version change signal.
>
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Mahadev Konar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >wrote:
>
> > Dima,
> > Batch is a new feature and touches a lot of the critical code and
> > isnt system tested. I dont think it would be advisable to include into
> > a stable bugfix release for now. What do others feel abt it?
> >
> > thanks
> > mahadev
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Dima Gutzeit
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Can we have batch operation as well included in that release ?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Dima Gutzeit.
> > >
> > > Sent from my iPhone
> > >
> > > On 27 באוק 2011, at 18:20, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Great, I'll propose a 3.3.4 release to the PMC, with myself as RM.
> > >>
> > >> Patrick
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>> I'd like to have a 3.3.4 release too, especially for addressing the
> > chroot
> > >>> issue (ZOOKEEPER-961). We have seen several Kafka users complaining
> > about
> > >>> the chroot issue in ZK.
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks,
> > >>>
> > >>> Jun
> > >>>
> > >>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> I've offered but no one showed any interest. I personally think we
> > >>>> should have one/more, including the most important fixes until 3.4.x
> > >>>> code line has stabilized for production use.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Patrick
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>>>> Is there going to be a 3.3.4 release?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Jun
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> Voting is currently under way on the dev list:
> > >>>>>> http://markmail.org/message/tpqkq57kl7tcp7xn
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >>>>>>> Hi,
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Has the release date for ZK 3.4 be determined? Thanks,
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Jun
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Dan Mihai Dumitriu <
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> We are using that function now as well, not for the performance,
> > but
> > >>>>>>>> for the atomicity property. It is incredibly convenient! We
> > built
> > >>>>>>>> our own package, but we're definitely looking forward to the
> > release!
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Ted Dunning <
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>> Performance was never the goal, but it might come along with
> the
> > >>>> rest
> > >>>>>>>>> because only a single round trip and single commit is required.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> I would love to hear your results on this.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Raj N <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Whats the release date for Zookeeper 3.4? I would like to use
> > the
> > >>>>>> batch
> > >>>>>>>>>> operations(
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-965
> > ).
> > >>>> Has
> > >>>>>>>>>> anybody
> > >>>>>>>>>> done any benchmarking on this one? How much of a performance
> > gain
> > >>>>>> does
> > >>>>>>>>>> batch
> > >>>>>>>>>> update give?
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks
> > >>>>>>>>>> -Raj
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >
> >
>
-
Re: Zookeeper 3.4Mathias Herberts 2011-11-06, 00:26
Having the chroot issue fixed would indeed be great.
+1
On Nov 5, 2011 3:05 PM, "Adam Rosien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 for the chroot fix! Need it bad!
>
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:05 AM, Ted Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 for fixes only in fix releases.
> >
> > Batch is an api change and needs to version change signal.
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Mahadev Konar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > Dima,
> > > Batch is a new feature and touches a lot of the critical code and
> > > isnt system tested. I dont think it would be advisable to include into
> > > a stable bugfix release for now. What do others feel abt it?
> > >
> > > thanks
> > > mahadev
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Dima Gutzeit
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Can we have batch operation as well included in that release ?
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Dima Gutzeit.
> > > >
> > > > Sent from my iPhone
> > > >
> > > > On 27 באוק 2011, at 18:20, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Great, I'll propose a 3.3.4 release to the PMC, with myself as RM.
> > > >>
> > > >> Patrick
> > > >>
> > > >> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >>> I'd like to have a 3.3.4 release too, especially for addressing the
> > > chroot
> > > >>> issue (ZOOKEEPER-961). We have seen several Kafka users complaining
> > > about
> > > >>> the chroot issue in ZK.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Thanks,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Jun
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> I've offered but no one showed any interest. I personally think we
> > > >>>> should have one/more, including the most important fixes until
> 3.4.x
> > > >>>> code line has stabilized for production use.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Patrick
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > >>>>> Is there going to be a 3.3.4 release?
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Thanks,
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Jun
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > > wrote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Voting is currently under way on the dev list:
> > > >>>>>> http://markmail.org/message/tpqkq57kl7tcp7xn
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > >>>>>>> Hi,
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Has the release date for ZK 3.4 be determined? Thanks,
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Jun
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Dan Mihai Dumitriu <
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> We are using that function now as well, not for the
> performance,
> > > but
> > > >>>>>>>> for the atomicity property. It is incredibly convenient! We
> > > built
> > > >>>>>>>> our own package, but we're definitely looking forward to the
> > > release!
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Ted Dunning <
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>> Performance was never the goal, but it might come along with
> > the
> > > >>>> rest
> > > >>>>>>>>> because only a single round trip and single commit is
> required.
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> I would love to hear your results on this.
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Raj N <
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Whats the release date for Zookeeper 3.4? I would like to
> use
> > > the
> > > >>>>>> batch
> > > >>>>>>>>>> operations(
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-965
> > > ).
> > > >>>> Has
> > > >>>>>>>>>> anybody
> > > >>>>>>>>>> done any benchmarking on this one? How much of a performance
> > > gain
> > > >>>>>> does
> > > >>>>>>>>>> batch
> > > >>>>>>>>>> update give?
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks
> > > >>>>>>>>>> -Raj
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>
+1
On Nov 5, 2011 3:05 PM, "Adam Rosien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 for the chroot fix! Need it bad!
>
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:05 AM, Ted Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 for fixes only in fix releases.
> >
> > Batch is an api change and needs to version change signal.
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Mahadev Konar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > Dima,
> > > Batch is a new feature and touches a lot of the critical code and
> > > isnt system tested. I dont think it would be advisable to include into
> > > a stable bugfix release for now. What do others feel abt it?
> > >
> > > thanks
> > > mahadev
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Dima Gutzeit
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Can we have batch operation as well included in that release ?
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Dima Gutzeit.
> > > >
> > > > Sent from my iPhone
> > > >
> > > > On 27 באוק 2011, at 18:20, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Great, I'll propose a 3.3.4 release to the PMC, with myself as RM.
> > > >>
> > > >> Patrick
> > > >>
> > > >> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >>> I'd like to have a 3.3.4 release too, especially for addressing the
> > > chroot
> > > >>> issue (ZOOKEEPER-961). We have seen several Kafka users complaining
> > > about
> > > >>> the chroot issue in ZK.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Thanks,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Jun
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> I've offered but no one showed any interest. I personally think we
> > > >>>> should have one/more, including the most important fixes until
> 3.4.x
> > > >>>> code line has stabilized for production use.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Patrick
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > >>>>> Is there going to be a 3.3.4 release?
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Thanks,
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Jun
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > > wrote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Voting is currently under way on the dev list:
> > > >>>>>> http://markmail.org/message/tpqkq57kl7tcp7xn
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > >>>>>>> Hi,
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Has the release date for ZK 3.4 be determined? Thanks,
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Jun
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Dan Mihai Dumitriu <
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> We are using that function now as well, not for the
> performance,
> > > but
> > > >>>>>>>> for the atomicity property. It is incredibly convenient! We
> > > built
> > > >>>>>>>> our own package, but we're definitely looking forward to the
> > > release!
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Ted Dunning <
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>> Performance was never the goal, but it might come along with
> > the
> > > >>>> rest
> > > >>>>>>>>> because only a single round trip and single commit is
> required.
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> I would love to hear your results on this.
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Raj N <
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Whats the release date for Zookeeper 3.4? I would like to
> use
> > > the
> > > >>>>>> batch
> > > >>>>>>>>>> operations(
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-965
> > > ).
> > > >>>> Has
> > > >>>>>>>>>> anybody
> > > >>>>>>>>>> done any benchmarking on this one? How much of a performance
> > > gain
> > > >>>>>> does
> > > >>>>>>>>>> batch
> > > >>>>>>>>>> update give?
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks
> > > >>>>>>>>>> -Raj
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>
-
Re: Zookeeper 3.4Neha Narkhede 2011-11-06, 00:39
For Kafka at LinkedIn, we would love to have the chroot bug fixed as
part of zookeeper 3.3.4
Thanks,
Neha
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Mathias Herberts
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Having the chroot issue fixed would indeed be great.
>
> +1
> On Nov 5, 2011 3:05 PM, "Adam Rosien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> +1 for the chroot fix! Need it bad!
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:05 AM, Ted Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > +1 for fixes only in fix releases.
>> >
>> > Batch is an api change and needs to version change signal.
>> >
>> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Mahadev Konar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > >wrote:
>> >
>> > > Dima,
>> > > Batch is a new feature and touches a lot of the critical code and
>> > > isnt system tested. I dont think it would be advisable to include into
>> > > a stable bugfix release for now. What do others feel abt it?
>> > >
>> > > thanks
>> > > mahadev
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Dima Gutzeit
>> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > > Can we have batch operation as well included in that release ?
>> > > >
>> > > > Regards,
>> > > > Dima Gutzeit.
>> > > >
>> > > > Sent from my iPhone
>> > > >
>> > > > On 27 באוק 2011, at 18:20, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >> Great, I'll propose a 3.3.4 release to the PMC, with myself as RM.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Patrick
>> > > >>
>> > > >> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > >>> I'd like to have a 3.3.4 release too, especially for addressing the
>> > > chroot
>> > > >>> issue (ZOOKEEPER-961). We have seen several Kafka users complaining
>> > > about
>> > > >>> the chroot issue in ZK.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> Thanks,
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> Jun
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>> I've offered but no one showed any interest. I personally think we
>> > > >>>> should have one/more, including the most important fixes until
>> 3.4.x
>> > > >>>> code line has stabilized for production use.
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> Patrick
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> > > >>>>> Is there going to be a 3.3.4 release?
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>> Thanks,
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>> Jun
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>>> Voting is currently under way on the dev list:
>> > > >>>>>> http://markmail.org/message/tpqkq57kl7tcp7xn
>> > > >>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > wrote:
>> > > >>>>>>> Hi,
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>> Has the release date for ZK 3.4 be determined? Thanks,
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>> Jun
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Dan Mihai Dumitriu <
>> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > > >>>>>>> wrote:
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>> We are using that function now as well, not for the
>> performance,
>> > > but
>> > > >>>>>>>> for the atomicity property. It is incredibly convenient! We
>> > > built
>> > > >>>>>>>> our own package, but we're definitely looking forward to the
>> > > release!
>> > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Ted Dunning <
>> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > > >>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > > >>>>>>>>> Performance was never the goal, but it might come along with
>> > the
>> > > >>>> rest
>> > > >>>>>>>>> because only a single round trip and single commit is
>> required.
>> > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>> I would love to hear your results on this.
>> > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Raj N <
>> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > > >
>> > > >>>>>> wrote:
>> > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Whats the release date for Zookeeper 3.4? I would like to
>> use
>> > > the
>> > > >>>>>> batch
>> > > >>>>>>>>>> operations(
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-965
part of zookeeper 3.3.4
Thanks,
Neha
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Mathias Herberts
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Having the chroot issue fixed would indeed be great.
>
> +1
> On Nov 5, 2011 3:05 PM, "Adam Rosien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> +1 for the chroot fix! Need it bad!
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:05 AM, Ted Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > +1 for fixes only in fix releases.
>> >
>> > Batch is an api change and needs to version change signal.
>> >
>> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Mahadev Konar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > >wrote:
>> >
>> > > Dima,
>> > > Batch is a new feature and touches a lot of the critical code and
>> > > isnt system tested. I dont think it would be advisable to include into
>> > > a stable bugfix release for now. What do others feel abt it?
>> > >
>> > > thanks
>> > > mahadev
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Dima Gutzeit
>> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > > Can we have batch operation as well included in that release ?
>> > > >
>> > > > Regards,
>> > > > Dima Gutzeit.
>> > > >
>> > > > Sent from my iPhone
>> > > >
>> > > > On 27 באוק 2011, at 18:20, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >> Great, I'll propose a 3.3.4 release to the PMC, with myself as RM.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Patrick
>> > > >>
>> > > >> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > >>> I'd like to have a 3.3.4 release too, especially for addressing the
>> > > chroot
>> > > >>> issue (ZOOKEEPER-961). We have seen several Kafka users complaining
>> > > about
>> > > >>> the chroot issue in ZK.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> Thanks,
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> Jun
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>> I've offered but no one showed any interest. I personally think we
>> > > >>>> should have one/more, including the most important fixes until
>> 3.4.x
>> > > >>>> code line has stabilized for production use.
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> Patrick
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> > > >>>>> Is there going to be a 3.3.4 release?
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>> Thanks,
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>> Jun
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>>> Voting is currently under way on the dev list:
>> > > >>>>>> http://markmail.org/message/tpqkq57kl7tcp7xn
>> > > >>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > wrote:
>> > > >>>>>>> Hi,
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>> Has the release date for ZK 3.4 be determined? Thanks,
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>> Jun
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Dan Mihai Dumitriu <
>> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > > >>>>>>> wrote:
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>> We are using that function now as well, not for the
>> performance,
>> > > but
>> > > >>>>>>>> for the atomicity property. It is incredibly convenient! We
>> > > built
>> > > >>>>>>>> our own package, but we're definitely looking forward to the
>> > > release!
>> > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Ted Dunning <
>> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > > >>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > > >>>>>>>>> Performance was never the goal, but it might come along with
>> > the
>> > > >>>> rest
>> > > >>>>>>>>> because only a single round trip and single commit is
>> required.
>> > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>> I would love to hear your results on this.
>> > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Raj N <
>> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > > >
>> > > >>>>>> wrote:
>> > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Whats the release date for Zookeeper 3.4? I would like to
>> use
>> > > the
>> > > >>>>>> batch
>> > > >>>>>>>>>> operations(
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-965
-
Re: Zookeeper 3.4Mahadev Konar 2011-11-06, 00:39
Matthias/others,
We definitely intend to make a 3.3.4 release soon (within weeks not months).
Glad to see feedback from users.
thanks
mahadev
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Mathias Herberts
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Having the chroot issue fixed would indeed be great.
>
> +1
> On Nov 5, 2011 3:05 PM, "Adam Rosien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> +1 for the chroot fix! Need it bad!
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:05 AM, Ted Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > +1 for fixes only in fix releases.
>> >
>> > Batch is an api change and needs to version change signal.
>> >
>> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Mahadev Konar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > >wrote:
>> >
>> > > Dima,
>> > > Batch is a new feature and touches a lot of the critical code and
>> > > isnt system tested. I dont think it would be advisable to include into
>> > > a stable bugfix release for now. What do others feel abt it?
>> > >
>> > > thanks
>> > > mahadev
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Dima Gutzeit
>> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > > Can we have batch operation as well included in that release ?
>> > > >
>> > > > Regards,
>> > > > Dima Gutzeit.
>> > > >
>> > > > Sent from my iPhone
>> > > >
>> > > > On 27 באוק 2011, at 18:20, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >> Great, I'll propose a 3.3.4 release to the PMC, with myself as RM.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Patrick
>> > > >>
>> > > >> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > >>> I'd like to have a 3.3.4 release too, especially for addressing the
>> > > chroot
>> > > >>> issue (ZOOKEEPER-961). We have seen several Kafka users complaining
>> > > about
>> > > >>> the chroot issue in ZK.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> Thanks,
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> Jun
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>> I've offered but no one showed any interest. I personally think we
>> > > >>>> should have one/more, including the most important fixes until
>> 3.4.x
>> > > >>>> code line has stabilized for production use.
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> Patrick
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> > > >>>>> Is there going to be a 3.3.4 release?
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>> Thanks,
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>> Jun
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>>> Voting is currently under way on the dev list:
>> > > >>>>>> http://markmail.org/message/tpqkq57kl7tcp7xn
>> > > >>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > wrote:
>> > > >>>>>>> Hi,
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>> Has the release date for ZK 3.4 be determined? Thanks,
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>> Jun
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Dan Mihai Dumitriu <
>> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > > >>>>>>> wrote:
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>> We are using that function now as well, not for the
>> performance,
>> > > but
>> > > >>>>>>>> for the atomicity property. It is incredibly convenient! We
>> > > built
>> > > >>>>>>>> our own package, but we're definitely looking forward to the
>> > > release!
>> > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Ted Dunning <
>> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > > >>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > > >>>>>>>>> Performance was never the goal, but it might come along with
>> > the
>> > > >>>> rest
>> > > >>>>>>>>> because only a single round trip and single commit is
>> required.
>> > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>> I would love to hear your results on this.
>> > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Raj N <
>> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > > >
>> > > >>>>>> wrote:
>> > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Whats the release date for Zookeeper 3.4? I would like to
>> use
>> > > the
>> > > >>>>>> batch
>> > > >>>>>>>>>> operations(
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-965
We definitely intend to make a 3.3.4 release soon (within weeks not months).
Glad to see feedback from users.
thanks
mahadev
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Mathias Herberts
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Having the chroot issue fixed would indeed be great.
>
> +1
> On Nov 5, 2011 3:05 PM, "Adam Rosien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> +1 for the chroot fix! Need it bad!
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:05 AM, Ted Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > +1 for fixes only in fix releases.
>> >
>> > Batch is an api change and needs to version change signal.
>> >
>> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Mahadev Konar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > >wrote:
>> >
>> > > Dima,
>> > > Batch is a new feature and touches a lot of the critical code and
>> > > isnt system tested. I dont think it would be advisable to include into
>> > > a stable bugfix release for now. What do others feel abt it?
>> > >
>> > > thanks
>> > > mahadev
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Dima Gutzeit
>> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > > Can we have batch operation as well included in that release ?
>> > > >
>> > > > Regards,
>> > > > Dima Gutzeit.
>> > > >
>> > > > Sent from my iPhone
>> > > >
>> > > > On 27 באוק 2011, at 18:20, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >> Great, I'll propose a 3.3.4 release to the PMC, with myself as RM.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Patrick
>> > > >>
>> > > >> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > >>> I'd like to have a 3.3.4 release too, especially for addressing the
>> > > chroot
>> > > >>> issue (ZOOKEEPER-961). We have seen several Kafka users complaining
>> > > about
>> > > >>> the chroot issue in ZK.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> Thanks,
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> Jun
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>> I've offered but no one showed any interest. I personally think we
>> > > >>>> should have one/more, including the most important fixes until
>> 3.4.x
>> > > >>>> code line has stabilized for production use.
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> Patrick
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> > > >>>>> Is there going to be a 3.3.4 release?
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>> Thanks,
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>> Jun
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>>> Voting is currently under way on the dev list:
>> > > >>>>>> http://markmail.org/message/tpqkq57kl7tcp7xn
>> > > >>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > wrote:
>> > > >>>>>>> Hi,
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>> Has the release date for ZK 3.4 be determined? Thanks,
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>> Jun
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Dan Mihai Dumitriu <
>> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > > >>>>>>> wrote:
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>> We are using that function now as well, not for the
>> performance,
>> > > but
>> > > >>>>>>>> for the atomicity property. It is incredibly convenient! We
>> > > built
>> > > >>>>>>>> our own package, but we're definitely looking forward to the
>> > > release!
>> > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Ted Dunning <
>> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > > >>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > > >>>>>>>>> Performance was never the goal, but it might come along with
>> > the
>> > > >>>> rest
>> > > >>>>>>>>> because only a single round trip and single commit is
>> required.
>> > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>> I would love to hear your results on this.
>> > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Raj N <
>> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > > >
>> > > >>>>>> wrote:
>> > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Whats the release date for Zookeeper 3.4? I would like to
>> use
>> > > the
>> > > >>>>>> batch
>> > > >>>>>>>>>> operations(
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-965
-
Re: Zookeeper 3.4Patrick Hunt 2011-11-07, 18:40
Once 3.4 is finalized I'll focus on getting 3.3.4 out.
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 5:39 PM, Mahadev Konar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matthias/others,
>
> We definitely intend to make a 3.3.4 release soon (within weeks not months).
>
> Glad to see feedback from users.
>
> thanks
> mahadev
>
> On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Mathias Herberts
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Having the chroot issue fixed would indeed be great.
>>
>> +1
>> On Nov 5, 2011 3:05 PM, "Adam Rosien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 for the chroot fix! Need it bad!
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:05 AM, Ted Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > +1 for fixes only in fix releases.
>>> >
>>> > Batch is an api change and needs to version change signal.
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Mahadev Konar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> > >wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Dima,
>>> > > Batch is a new feature and touches a lot of the critical code and
>>> > > isnt system tested. I dont think it would be advisable to include into
>>> > > a stable bugfix release for now. What do others feel abt it?
>>> > >
>>> > > thanks
>>> > > mahadev
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Dima Gutzeit
>>> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> > > > Can we have batch operation as well included in that release ?
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Regards,
>>> > > > Dima Gutzeit.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Sent from my iPhone
>>> > > >
>>> > > > On 27 באוק 2011, at 18:20, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> > > >
>>> > > >> Great, I'll propose a 3.3.4 release to the PMC, with myself as RM.
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> Patrick
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> > > >>> I'd like to have a 3.3.4 release too, especially for addressing the
>>> > > chroot
>>> > > >>> issue (ZOOKEEPER-961). We have seen several Kafka users complaining
>>> > > about
>>> > > >>> the chroot issue in ZK.
>>> > > >>>
>>> > > >>> Thanks,
>>> > > >>>
>>> > > >>> Jun
>>> > > >>>
>>> > > >>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> > > wrote:
>>> > > >>>
>>> > > >>>> I've offered but no one showed any interest. I personally think we
>>> > > >>>> should have one/more, including the most important fixes until
>>> 3.4.x
>>> > > >>>> code line has stabilized for production use.
>>> > > >>>>
>>> > > >>>> Patrick
>>> > > >>>>
>>> > > >>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
>>> > > >>>>> Is there going to be a 3.3.4 release?
>>> > > >>>>>
>>> > > >>>>> Thanks,
>>> > > >>>>>
>>> > > >>>>> Jun
>>> > > >>>>>
>>> > > >>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> >
>>> > > wrote:
>>> > > >>>>>
>>> > > >>>>>> Voting is currently under way on the dev list:
>>> > > >>>>>> http://markmail.org/message/tpqkq57kl7tcp7xn
>>> > > >>>>>>
>>> > > >>>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> > wrote:
>>> > > >>>>>>> Hi,
>>> > > >>>>>>>
>>> > > >>>>>>> Has the release date for ZK 3.4 be determined? Thanks,
>>> > > >>>>>>>
>>> > > >>>>>>> Jun
>>> > > >>>>>>>
>>> > > >>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Dan Mihai Dumitriu <
>>> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> > > >>>>>>> wrote:
>>> > > >>>>>>>
>>> > > >>>>>>>> We are using that function now as well, not for the
>>> performance,
>>> > > but
>>> > > >>>>>>>> for the atomicity property. It is incredibly convenient! We
>>> > > built
>>> > > >>>>>>>> our own package, but we're definitely looking forward to the
>>> > > release!
>>> > > >>>>>>>>
>>> > > >>>>>>>>
>>> > > >>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Ted Dunning <
>>> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> > > >>>>>>>> wrote:
>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Performance was never the goal, but it might come along with
>>> > the
>>> > > >>>> rest
>>> > > >>>>>>>>> because only a single round trip and single commit is
>>> required.
>>> > > >>>>>>>>>
>>> > > >>>>>>>>> I would love to hear your results on this.
>>> > > >>>>>>>>>
>>> > > >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Raj N <
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 5:39 PM, Mahadev Konar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matthias/others,
>
> We definitely intend to make a 3.3.4 release soon (within weeks not months).
>
> Glad to see feedback from users.
>
> thanks
> mahadev
>
> On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Mathias Herberts
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Having the chroot issue fixed would indeed be great.
>>
>> +1
>> On Nov 5, 2011 3:05 PM, "Adam Rosien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 for the chroot fix! Need it bad!
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:05 AM, Ted Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > +1 for fixes only in fix releases.
>>> >
>>> > Batch is an api change and needs to version change signal.
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Mahadev Konar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> > >wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Dima,
>>> > > Batch is a new feature and touches a lot of the critical code and
>>> > > isnt system tested. I dont think it would be advisable to include into
>>> > > a stable bugfix release for now. What do others feel abt it?
>>> > >
>>> > > thanks
>>> > > mahadev
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Dima Gutzeit
>>> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> > > > Can we have batch operation as well included in that release ?
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Regards,
>>> > > > Dima Gutzeit.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Sent from my iPhone
>>> > > >
>>> > > > On 27 באוק 2011, at 18:20, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> > > >
>>> > > >> Great, I'll propose a 3.3.4 release to the PMC, with myself as RM.
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> Patrick
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> > > >>> I'd like to have a 3.3.4 release too, especially for addressing the
>>> > > chroot
>>> > > >>> issue (ZOOKEEPER-961). We have seen several Kafka users complaining
>>> > > about
>>> > > >>> the chroot issue in ZK.
>>> > > >>>
>>> > > >>> Thanks,
>>> > > >>>
>>> > > >>> Jun
>>> > > >>>
>>> > > >>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> > > wrote:
>>> > > >>>
>>> > > >>>> I've offered but no one showed any interest. I personally think we
>>> > > >>>> should have one/more, including the most important fixes until
>>> 3.4.x
>>> > > >>>> code line has stabilized for production use.
>>> > > >>>>
>>> > > >>>> Patrick
>>> > > >>>>
>>> > > >>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
>>> > > >>>>> Is there going to be a 3.3.4 release?
>>> > > >>>>>
>>> > > >>>>> Thanks,
>>> > > >>>>>
>>> > > >>>>> Jun
>>> > > >>>>>
>>> > > >>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> >
>>> > > wrote:
>>> > > >>>>>
>>> > > >>>>>> Voting is currently under way on the dev list:
>>> > > >>>>>> http://markmail.org/message/tpqkq57kl7tcp7xn
>>> > > >>>>>>
>>> > > >>>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Jun Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> > wrote:
>>> > > >>>>>>> Hi,
>>> > > >>>>>>>
>>> > > >>>>>>> Has the release date for ZK 3.4 be determined? Thanks,
>>> > > >>>>>>>
>>> > > >>>>>>> Jun
>>> > > >>>>>>>
>>> > > >>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Dan Mihai Dumitriu <
>>> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> > > >>>>>>> wrote:
>>> > > >>>>>>>
>>> > > >>>>>>>> We are using that function now as well, not for the
>>> performance,
>>> > > but
>>> > > >>>>>>>> for the atomicity property. It is incredibly convenient! We
>>> > > built
>>> > > >>>>>>>> our own package, but we're definitely looking forward to the
>>> > > release!
>>> > > >>>>>>>>
>>> > > >>>>>>>>
>>> > > >>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Ted Dunning <
>>> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> > > >>>>>>>> wrote:
>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Performance was never the goal, but it might come along with
>>> > the
>>> > > >>>> rest
>>> > > >>>>>>>>> because only a single round trip and single commit is
>>> required.
>>> > > >>>>>>>>>
>>> > > >>>>>>>>> I would love to hear your results on this.
>>> > > >>>>>>>>>
>>> > > >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Raj N <
