All,
   Should we allow use of the Hadoop security logo (hadoop-security-
logo.jpg) from HADOOP-6721. Clearly, I'm +1.

-- Owen

Owen O'Malley wrote:
>   Should we allow use of the Hadoop security logo
> (hadoop-security-logo.jpg) from HADOOP-6721. Clearly, I'm +1.

Allow use where?  What's the intended purpose for this logo?

As Hadoop releases add security features, won't the existing logo suffice?

Doug

On Apr 22, 2010, at 2:44 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:

> Owen O'Malley wrote:
>>  Should we allow use of the Hadoop security logo (hadoop-security-
>> logo.jpg) from HADOOP-6721. Clearly, I'm +1.
>
> Allow use where?  What's the intended purpose for this logo?

The short term desire is to make t-shirts with a Hadoop security logo.  
It will also be used in documentation and literature relating to the  
Hadoop security features.

-- Owen

+1 for using the logo at least in t-shirts & security related documentation.
On 4/22/10 3:17 PM, "Owen O'Malley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On Apr 22, 2010, at 2:44 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:

> Owen O'Malley wrote:
>>  Should we allow use of the Hadoop security logo (hadoop-security-
>> logo.jpg) from HADOOP-6721. Clearly, I'm +1.
>
> Allow use where?  What's the intended purpose for this logo?

The short term desire is to make t-shirts with a Hadoop security logo.
It will also be used in documentation and literature relating to the
Hadoop security features.

-- Owen

Are we saying that we create a separate logo for every major feature we put
into Hadoop?

thanks,
dhruba

On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 9:31 PM, Devaraj Das <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> +1 for using the logo at least in t-shirts & security related
> documentation.
>
>
> On 4/22/10 3:17 PM, "Owen O'Malley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Apr 22, 2010, at 2:44 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
>
> > Owen O'Malley wrote:
> >>  Should we allow use of the Hadoop security logo (hadoop-security-
> >> logo.jpg) from HADOOP-6721. Clearly, I'm +1.
> >
> > Allow use where?  What's the intended purpose for this logo?
>
> The short term desire is to make t-shirts with a Hadoop security logo.
> It will also be used in documentation and literature relating to the
> Hadoop security features.
>
> -- Owen
>
>
--
Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba

On Apr 22, 2010, at 9:35 PM, Dhruba Borthakur wrote:

> Are we saying that we create a separate logo for every major feature  
> we put
> into Hadoop?

The issue is that to stay within Apache rules, all variants of the  
Hadoop elephant must be official Hadoop logos. Clearly it is not  
necessary to have a new logo for a feature, but it can be fun. This  
logo certainly doesn't harm the Hadoop image and conveys the intended  
meaning.

*Laugh* It is amusing to imagine what append's logo would look like.  
If you wanted to make an append (or some other feature) logo, the logo  
looked nice, and didn't harm the Hadoop image, that would be  
reasonable in my opinion.

-- Owen

+1

I personally love to see that my daughter wears a T-shirt with a secure
Hadoop logo to show off she is the youngest Hadoop contributor. :-)

Hairong
On 4/22/10 10:30 PM, "Owen O'Malley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> On Apr 22, 2010, at 9:35 PM, Dhruba Borthakur wrote:
>
>> Are we saying that we create a separate logo for every major feature
>> we put
>> into Hadoop?
>
> The issue is that to stay within Apache rules, all variants of the
> Hadoop elephant must be official Hadoop logos. Clearly it is not
> necessary to have a new logo for a feature, but it can be fun. This
> logo certainly doesn't harm the Hadoop image and conveys the intended
> meaning.
>
> *Laugh* It is amusing to imagine what append's logo would look like.
> If you wanted to make an append (or some other feature) logo, the logo
> looked nice, and didn't harm the Hadoop image, that would be
> reasonable in my opinion.
>
> -- Owen

On Apr 22, 2010, at 2:36 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:

> All,
>  Should we allow use of the Hadoop security logo (hadoop-security-
> logo.jpg) from HADOOP-6721. Clearly, I'm +1.

With 4 +1's (including Eli's from the jira) the vote passes.

Thanks,
    Owen