-[MOTION PASSED, VOTE CLOSED] WAS -> Re: [VOTE] Commit hdfs-1024 to 0.20 branch
Thanks to all who participated in the vote.
I'll commit in a minute.
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please on committing HDFS-1024 to the hadoop 0.20 branch.
> HDFS-1024 fixes possible trashing of fsimage because of failed copy
> from 2NN and NN. Ordinarily, possible corruption of this proportion
> would merit commit w/o need of a vote only Dhruba correctly notes that
> UNLESS both NN and 2NN are upgraded, HDFS-1024 becomes an incompatible
> change (the NN<->2NN communication will fail always). IMO, this
> incompatible change can be plastered over with a release note; e.g.
> WARNING, you MUST update NN and 2NN when you go to 0.20.3 hadoop. If
> you agree with me, please vote +1 on commit.