Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
HBase >> mail # user >> Table listed in "list", but not in .META.


Copy link to this message
-
Re: Table listed in "list", but not in .META.
Can you try to reboot the machine and run repair again. Might not sound logical but I would give it a shot.

PS: My personal experience is that hbase and hadoop has never been reliable in my standalone environment. I always trust the distributed cluster environment. AFAIK, these things are tested extensively in distributed mode.

Best Regards,
Anil

On Aug 10, 2012, at 5:00 PM, Marco Gallotta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Nope, not in safe mode. Gar, this is going nowhere. :/ Thanks for the help so far though!
>
> Configured Capacity: 211474616320 (196.95 GB)
> Present Capacity: 169354764288 (157.72 GB)
> DFS Remaining: 162401554432 (151.25 GB)
> DFS Used: 6953209856 (6.48 GB)
> DFS Used%: 4.11%
> Under replicated blocks: 436
> Blocks with corrupt replicas: 0
> Missing blocks: 0
>
> -------------------------------------------------
> Datanodes available: 1 (1 total, 0 dead)
>
> Name: 127.0.0.1:50010
> Decommission Status : Normal
> Configured Capacity: 211474616320 (196.95 GB)
> DFS Used: 6953209856 (6.48 GB)
> Non DFS Used: 42119852032 (39.23 GB)
> DFS Remaining: 162401554432(151.25 GB)
> DFS Used%: 3.29%
> DFS Remaining%: 76.79%
> Last contact: Fri Aug 10 16:59:26 PDT 2012
>
>
>
> --
> Marco Gallotta | Mountain View, California
> Software Engineer, Infrastructure | Loki Studios
> fb.me/marco.gallotta | twitter.com/marcog
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +1 (650) 417-3313
>
> Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig)
>
>
> On Friday 10 August 2012 at 4:52 PM, Mohammad Tariq wrote:
>
>> If your HDFS is in safemode you'll get something like this :
>>
>> cluster@ubuntu:~/hadoop-1.0.3$ bin/hadoop dfsadmin -report
>> Safe mode is ON
>> Configured Capacity: 31111143424 (28.97 GB)
>> Present Capacity: 5309755392 (4.95 GB)
>> DFS Remaining: 4799320064 (4.47 GB)
>> DFS Used: 510435328 (486.79 MB)
>> DFS Used%: 9.61%
>> Under replicated blocks: 1
>> Blocks with corrupt replicas: 0
>> Missing blocks: 0
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------
>> Datanodes available: 1 (1 total, 0 dead)
>>
>> Name: 127.0.0.1:50010
>> Decommission Status : Normal
>> Configured Capacity: 31111143424 (28.97 GB)
>> DFS Used: 510435328 (486.79 MB)
>> Non DFS Used: 25801388032 (24.03 GB)
>> DFS Remaining: 4799320064(4.47 GB)
>> DFS Used%: 1.64%
>> DFS Remaining%: 15.43%
>> Last contact: Sat Aug 11 05:19:18 IST 2012
>>
>> See the line in red color.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Mohammad Tariq
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 5:20 AM, Mohammad Tariq <[EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])> wrote:
>>> You can use "bin/hadoop dfsadmin -report" to do that. Alternatively
>>> point your web browser to http://localhost:9000. It'll show all the
>>> details of your HDFS.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Mohammad Tariq
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 5:16 AM, Marco Gallotta <[EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])>
>> wrote:
>>>> How do you check that?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Marco Gallotta | Mountain View, California
>>>> Software Engineer, Infrastructure | Loki Studios
>>>> fb.me/marco.gallotta (http://fb.me/marco.gallotta) | twitter.com/marcog (http://twitter.com/marcog)
>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) | +1 (650) 417-3313
>>>>
>>>> Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Friday 10 August 2012 at 4:44 PM, Mohammad Tariq wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> This is pretty strange. I mean everything seems to be in place, but we
>>>>> are stuck. Please make a check once if your Hdfs is in safemode.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Mohammad Tariq
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 5:13 AM, Mohammad Tariq <[EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])(mailto:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]))> wrote:
>>>>>> What about fs.default.name (http://fs.default.name)?????
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Mohammad Tariq
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 5:10 AM, Marco Gallotta <[EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])(mailto:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]))> wrote: