Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
HBase, mail # dev - [UPDATE] Finishing up 0.96 --> WAS Re: 0.95 and 0.96 remaining issues


Copy link to this message
-
Re: [UPDATE] Finishing up 0.96 --> WAS Re: 0.95 and 0.96 remaining issues
ramkrishna vasudevan 2013-08-15, 08:36
Okie.. Let me try to do that . You wanna take a look at HFileV3 with Tags?
 Would always help in getting more reviews.  Thanks Todd.

Regards
Ram
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Todd Lipcon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hey Ram,
>
> Just a thought: could you make the backward-incompatible changes in the
> data format ahead of actually having support for using them? EG if you need
> a new field, put it unused in the WAL now to reserve space for it?
>
> -Todd
>
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 11:44 PM, ramkrishna vasudevan <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Stack
> >
> > First I would like to thank you for the reviews and understand the
> > decision.
> > I would just like to highlight few facts if this does not make into 0.96
> > then we may have to
> > -> Handle backward compatability issues with WAL.  Currently inorder to
> > retrieve tags we write a taglength thought it is 0.  This would help us
> to
> > replay WAL with Tags.
> > -> Codecs like PRefixTreeCodec needs to be working for versions without
> > Tags.  Currently as PrefixTreeCodec is not out in any release these are
> not
> > a problem for now.
> >
> > So to avoid these problems we can get these Tags on 0.96 release.  May
> be a
> > few more days of time.  Is it possible?  I can try getting people for
> more
> > reviews too.
> > Thanks Stack.  Nice of you.
> >
> > Regards
> > Ram
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 7:09 AM, Devaraj Das <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > A late breaking one- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9227.
> > > Kindly consider for the upcoming RC.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Andrew Purtell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I see no reason that 0.98 cannot come out a week or a month after
> > 0.96;
> > > >
> > > >  tags is close and justification enough for a major release.
> > > > > I propose Andrew as RM for 0.98/1.0.0 if he is up for taking it on.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I would be pleased to volunteer to RM 0.98.
> > > >
> > > > It will be a challenge for anyone to live up to your outstanding
> > example
> > > > for 0.96.
> > > >
> > > > If I were to be your RM for 0.98, then I would suggest a .0 release
> in
> > > the
> > > > beginning of October. There are 42 open issues against 0.98
> > specifically
> > > > and I would like to also provide everyone some time for post 0.96
> > release
> > > > thinking.
> > > >
> > > > I am not sure we should move from 0.98 to 1.0 without another interim
> > > > release, that would be a call for a later time perhaps, maybe a 1.0
> > > release
> > > > at the start of January 2014.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best regards,
> > > >
> > > >    - Andy
> > > >
> > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> > Hein
> > > > (via Tom White)
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> > > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or
> entity
> > to
> > > which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> > > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the
> reader
> > > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
> > that
> > > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> > > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> > > received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> > immediately
> > > and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Todd Lipcon
> Software Engineer, Cloudera
>