Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
Hadoop >> mail # general >> LimitedPrivate and HBase


+
Allen Wittenauer 2011-06-06, 16:45
+
Todd Lipcon 2011-06-06, 17:00
+
Allen Wittenauer 2011-06-06, 17:36
+
Stack 2011-06-06, 18:34
+
Allen Wittenauer 2011-06-06, 20:45
+
Andrew Purtell 2011-06-06, 23:22
+
Allen Wittenauer 2011-06-06, 23:34
+
Todd Lipcon 2011-06-07, 00:56
+
Allen Wittenauer 2011-06-07, 01:05
+
Todd Lipcon 2011-06-07, 01:08
+
Allen Wittenauer 2011-06-07, 01:18
+
Todd Lipcon 2011-06-07, 01:23
+
Allen Wittenauer 2011-06-07, 01:33
+
Andrew Purtell 2011-06-08, 16:17
+
Todd Lipcon 2011-06-08, 16:39
+
Eric Baldeschwieler 2011-06-09, 16:28
+
Tom White 2011-06-09, 17:27
+
Konstantin Boudnik 2011-06-09, 17:38
Copy link to this message
-
Re: LimitedPrivate and HBase
Javadoc did not capture the intent well. Please see HADOOP-5073. We should
fix the Javadoc to avoid confusion.

Even though there are only few instances of LimitedPrivate, I prefer
retaining. I prefer to keep MiniDFSCluster LimitedPrivate and not support as
as public interface.
On 6/9/11 10:27 AM, "Tom White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Looking at current usage in Hadoop, there are only 4 LimitedPrivate
> references to HBase (the http, io.retry, ipc, and metrics packages in
> Common), and 2 references to Pig (the two LineRecordReader classes in
> MapReduce). The other LimitedPrivate references are all to HDFS or
> MapReduce. Given that Private means "Intended for use only within
> Hadoop itself" (according to the javadoc), we can replace these
> references with Private.
>
> We could also change the remaining 6 cases of LimitedPrivate to Public
> (note that they are already annotated Evolving or Unstable), and
> deprecate LimitedPrivate. Would this allay people's concerns?
>
> Cheers,
> Tom
>
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Eric Baldeschwieler
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'd like to see a proposal circulated to handle this concern in a
>> maintainable way.
>>
>> On Jun 8, 2011, at 9:17 AM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
>>
>>>> From: Allen Wittenauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>     OK.  That's make it easier to just
>>>> -1 changes like this with reasoning such as "HBase is not a
>>>> related project." Then we can go back working on core
>>>> Hadoop.
>>>
>>> Seriously?
>>>
>>> Forget what I said about filing a JIRA (and working on it) to give
>>> HttpServer an extensibility that possibly would past muster with you.
>>>
>>>  - Andy
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
+
Konstantin Boudnik 2011-06-09, 18:02
+
Allen Wittenauer 2011-06-13, 16:51
+
Konstantin Boudnik 2011-06-13, 17:10
+
Sanjay Radia 2011-06-14, 19:58
+
Sanjay Radia 2011-06-14, 21:20
+
Tom White 2011-06-15, 18:21
+
Sanjay Radia 2011-06-16, 15:44
+
Ian Holsman 2011-06-07, 01:50
+
Andrew Purtell 2011-06-08, 16:13
+
Steve Loughran 2011-06-08, 16:36
+
Stack 2011-06-09, 18:30
+
Stack 2011-06-09, 18:20
+
Steve Loughran 2011-06-07, 09:09
+
Ted Dunning 2011-06-07, 10:10
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB