Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
HBase, mail # dev - ANN: The second hbase-0.96-1 release candidate is available for download


Copy link to this message
-
Re: ANN: The second hbase-0.96-1 release candidate is available for download
Jimmy Xiang 2013-12-10, 00:13
HBASE-10101 is in. Thanks.
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Are we good to go on RC2?  Just waiting on HBase-10101?  Anything else?
> Thanks,
> St.Ack
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Jon fixed the Increment issue.  Nicolas may have fixed the slow down
> issue
> > -- we'll know after a few runs this weekend.
> >
> > I'll put up a new RC Monday regardless.
> >
> > St.Ack
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 6:16 AM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Good one Jon.
> >>
> >> RC is sunk.  Will put up a new one when this is fixed.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> St.Ack
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 12:10 AM, Jonathan Hsieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> -1
> >>>
> >>> I have a new test I tried on 0.96.1rc1. (polishing to share).  Run #2
> >>> with
> >>> flushes is a correctness regression (HBASE-6195 fixed this in 94, and I
> >>> had
> >>> verified there but it is broken here)..  I'm not sure if #3 (kill) or
> #4
> >>> (kill -9) are a regression against 0.94.   Here's a link to the
> testcode
> >>> (its got all kinds of caveats at the moment and will likely get turn
> into
> >>> integration test).
> >>>
> >>> https://github.com/jmhsieh/hbase/tree/increval
> >>>
> >>> 5 nodes
> >>> hadoop 2.1.0 (a pre cdh5b1 hdfs).
> >>> hbase 0.96.1 rc1
> >>>
> >>> Test: 250000 increments on a single row an single col with various
> number
> >>> of client threads (IncrementBlaster).  Verify we have a count of 250000
> >>> after the run (IncrementVerifier).
> >>>
> >>> Run 1: No fault injection.  5 runs.  count = 250000. on multiple runs.
> >>>  Correctness verified.  1638 inc/s throughput.
> >>> Run 2: flushes table with incrementing row.  count = 246875 !=250000.
> >>>  correctness failed.  1517 inc/s throughput.
> >>> Run 3: kill of rs hosting incremented row.  count = 243750 != 250000.
> >>> Correctness failed.   1451 inc/s throughput.
> >>> Run 4: one kill -9 of rs hosting incremented row.  246878.!= 250000.
> >>>  Correctness failed. 1395 inc/s (including recovery)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > The second hbase-0.96.1 release candidate is available for download:
> >>> >
> >>> >   http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.96.1RC1/
> >>> >
> >>> > The maven artifacts are available here:
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-016/
> >>> >
> >>> > The first RC was sunk by:
> >>> >
> >>> >   HBASE-10053 ProtobufUtil#toMutationNoData interface change causes
> >>> > downstream
> >>> >
> >>> > We broke hive building against HBase.
> >>> >
> >>> > 137 issues [1] have been fixed since 0.96.0, mostly performance
> >>> improvement
> >>> > and bug fixes.
> >>> >
> >>> > Shall we release this as hbase-0.96.1?  Please vote by December 3rd.
> >>> >
> >>> > Thanks,
> >>> > Your HBase Team
> >>> >
> >>> > 1. http://goo.gl/ZgYBW2
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > > The first hbase-0.96.1 release candidate is available for download:
> >>> > >
> >>> > >   http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.96.1RC0/
> >>> > >
> >>> > > The staged mvn artifacts can be found here:
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-012/
> >>> > >
> >>> > > 127 issues [1] have been fixed since 0.96.0, mostly performance
> >>> > improvement
> >>> > > and bug fixes.  See below for the full list.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Shall we release this as hbase-0.96.1?  Please vote by December
> 3rd.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Thanks,
> >>> > > Your HBase Team
> >>> > >
> >>> > > 1. http://goo.gl/ZgYBW2
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Issues fixed in this RC:
> >>> > >
> >>> > > HBASE-8143 HBase on Hadoop 2 with local short circuit reads (ssr)
> >>> causes
> >>> > > OOM
> >>> > > HBASE-10015 Replace intrinsic locking with explicit locks in
> >>> StoreScanner
> >>> > > HBASE-10026 HBaseAdmin#createTable could fail if region splits too