Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Flume, mail # dev - [VOTE] Release Apache Flume version 1.3.0


Copy link to this message
-
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flume version 1.3.0-rc3
Mike Percy 2012-11-18, 03:26
I think that's the right way to go. Sorry for causing trouble guys! :)

Regards,
Mike
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Hari Shreedharan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> Done! Thanks Mike, Brock!
>
>
> Hari
>
> --
> Hari Shreedharan
>
>
> On Saturday, November 17, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Brock Noland wrote:
>
> > Ok, let's do another rc since the same lobs with different versions is
> probably bad.
> >
> > Also I think it's fine to commit to 1.3 without another rc since we are
> voting on a tag, not the branch.
> >
> > --
> > Brock Noland
> > Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig)
> >
> >
> > On Saturday, November 17, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Mike Percy wrote:
> >
> > > Hari,
> > > You're correct that a -1 vote does not veto a release. A savvy user
> could
> > > delete one of the jars before deploying to production, but why make
> them do
> > > that.
> > >
> > > Thanks for the commit.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Mike
> > >
> > > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Hari Shreedharan <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
> > > > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > Mike,
> > > >
> > > > I committed your patch for flume-1.4, and trunk.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Brock: As I posted on the jira, if you want it committed to
> flume-1.3. the
> > > > RM should decide if another RC is required (looks like there are 3
> PMC +1
> > > > already, unless someone withdraws the +1). If required, please
> cherry-pick
> > > > the patch to flume-1.3.0 and roll another RC.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Hari
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Hari Shreedharan
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Saturday, November 17, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Mike Percy wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > When I was reviewing the libs I noticed that netty is in there
> twice
> > > > with 2
> > > > > different versions. I don't think we should ship like that.
> > > > >
> > > > > So, -1 from me on this RC.
> > > > >
> > > > > Details and a patch are here:
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-1723
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Mike
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Brock Noland <[EMAIL PROTECTED](mailto:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED])(mailto:
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]))> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks Hari, I have created FLUME-1722 for this purpose.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-1722
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Brock
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Hari Shreedharan
> > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])>
> wrote:
> > > > > > > +1.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Here is what I checked:
> > > > > > > 1. Checksums and signatures look good.
> > > > > > > 2. Verified license file, readme, change log and notice file
> (more on
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > this below).
> > > > > > > 3. Built, ran unit tests, ran an agent with the sample config
> - looks
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > good.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Additional notes:
> > > > > > > The LICENSE file seems to list three libraries which we do not
> pull
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > in:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > commons logging
> > > > > > > http-client
> > > > > > > http-core
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > We probably should remove these from the license file too.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Hari
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Hari Shreedharan
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Saturday, November 17, 2012 at 12:57 AM, Alexander
> Alten-Lorenz
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > - Alex
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Nov 17, 2012, at 4:10 AM, Will McQueen <[EMAIL PROTECTED](mailto:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED])(mailto:
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])) (mailto:
> > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]))> wrote: