Frank Smith 2013-06-09, 20:37
Christopher 2013-06-09, 21:08
Frank Smith 2013-06-10, 00:21
Christopher 2013-06-10, 00:47
Josh Elser 2013-06-10, 00:45
Frank Smith 2013-06-10, 00:56
You would likely want to keep some common prefix in the key. This would
make seeking to an arbitrary point in the file easier.
doc1 data:0000001  _bytes_
doc1 data:0000002  _bytes_
doc1 data:0000003  _bytes_
As far as chunk size, Christopher's advice is probably better than
anything I could provide without direct experimentation with the HDFS
block size, Accumulo table.file.compress.blocksize, and size of each
Value. The best choice for you likely depends on your usage patterns.
You could even store additional metadata for each "document" you store,
such as chunk size, number of chunks, etc. Lots of flexibility with how
you could approach this given the flexibility Accumulo provides with the
columns you can use.
On 06/09/2013 08:56 PM, Frank Smith wrote:
> That is an interesting idea. Would you link them through the keys, or
> append the key to the end of the value of the previous part?
> You have thoughts on how big the chunks should be?
> I definitely agree that it would be better to keep the data in Accumulo,
> vice references to the HDFS. Accumulo already gives me a scheme for
> organizing files very effectively on the HDFS, rolling my own doesn't
> make sense, unless I don't have a good sense for the limitations of a
> tablet server to manage those large files.
> > Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2013 20:45:15 -0400
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Best practices in sizing values?
> > One thing I wanted to add is that you will likely fare quite well
> > storing your very large files as a linked-list of bytes (multiple
> > key-value pairs make up one of your large blobs of text). You can even
> > use your segmentation of the large chunks of text to do more efficient
> > seek'ing within the file, if applicable to your application.
> > I personally don't like the idea of using storing HDFS URIs into
> > Accumulo. If you think about what Accumulo is providing you, one of the
> > things it's great at is abstracting away the notion of that underlying
> > filesystem. Just a thought.
> > On 06/09/2013 08:21 PM, Frank Smith wrote:
> > > So, what are your thoughts on storing a bunch of small files on the
> > > HDFS? Sequence Files, Avro?
> > >
> > > I will note that these are essentially write once and read heavy chunks
> > > of text.
> > >
> > > > Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2013 17:08:42 -0400
> > > > Subject: Re: Best practices in sizing values?
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > > At the very least, I would keep it under the size of your compressed
> > > > data blocks in your RFiles (this may mean you should increase
> value of
> > > > table.file.compress.blocksize to be larger than the default of 100K).
> > > >
> > > > You could also tweak this according to your application. Say, for
> > > > example, you wanted to limit the additional work to resolve the
> > > > pointer and retrieve from HDFS only 5% of the time, you could sample
> > > > your data, and choose a cutoff value that keeps 95% of your data in
> > > > the Accumulo table.
> > > >
> > > > Personally, I like to keep things under 1MB in the value, and
> under 1K
> > > > in the key, as a crude rule of thumb, but it very much depends on the
> > > > application.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Christopher L Tubbs II
> > > > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Frank Smith
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > I have an application where I have a block of unstructured text.
> > > Normally
> > > > > that text is relatively small <500k, but there are conditions where
> > > it can
> > > > > be up to GBs of text.
> > > > >
> > > > > I was considering of using a threshold where I simply decide to
> > > change from
> > > > > storing the text in the value of my mutation, and just add a
> > > reference to
> > > > > the HDFS location, but I wanted to get some advice on where that
Billie Rinaldi 2013-06-10, 01:45