Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
Accumulo >> mail # user >> Communication issue between zookeeper and accumulo


+
Ray Pfaff 2013-08-06, 14:38
+
Eric Newton 2013-08-06, 14:56
+
Ray Pfaff 2013-08-06, 15:00
+
Eric Newton 2013-08-06, 15:12
+
Ray Pfaff 2013-08-06, 16:19
+
Sean Busbey 2013-08-06, 16:48
+
Ray Pfaff 2013-08-06, 16:53
+
Ott, Charles H. 2013-08-06, 17:18
+
Ray Pfaff 2013-08-06, 17:25
+
Brendan Heussler 2013-08-06, 17:27
+
Ray Pfaff 2013-08-06, 17:33
+
Sean Busbey 2013-08-06, 17:35
+
Ray Pfaff 2013-08-06, 17:40
+
Eric Newton 2013-08-07, 18:09
+
Ray Pfaff 2013-08-07, 18:27
Copy link to this message
-
Re: Communication issue between zookeeper and accumulo
Can you post the full logs from the tablet servers somewhere and send a
link?

On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Ray Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>  It's from one of the tablet servers, but looking at one of the zookeeper
> servers, it's exactly the same
>
>   From: Sean Busbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tuesday, August 6, 2013 1:35 PM
>
> To: Accumulo User List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Communication issue between zookeeper and accumulo
>
>   Is that on the ZK server or the TabletServer? Can we also see the
> other?
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Ray Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>  Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT)
>> target     prot opt source               destination
>> ACCEPT     tcp  --  anywhere             anywhere            tcp dpt:ssh
>> ACCEPT     icmp --  anywhere             anywhere            icmp
>> echo-reply
>> ACCEPT     icmp --  anywhere             anywhere            icmp
>> echo-request
>> ACCEPT     tcp  --  anywhere             anywhere            tcp dpt:nrpe
>> ACCEPT     udp  --  anywhere             anywhere            udp
>> dpt:domain
>>
>>  Chain FORWARD (policy DROP)
>> target     prot opt source               destination
>>
>>  Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT)
>> target     prot opt source               destination
>>
>>   From: Brendan Heussler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Reply-To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Date: Tuesday, August 6, 2013 1:27 PM
>> To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> Subject: Re: Communication issue between zookeeper and accumulo
>>
>>   What is the output of iptables --list?
>>
>>
>>
>> Brendan
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Ray Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>  Not sure what you mean.  I get the error "Fatal ip6_tables not found."
>>>  I'm assuming that means disabled?
>>>
>>>   From: <Ott>, "Charles H." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Reply-To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Date: Tuesday, August 6, 2013 1:18 PM
>>> To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Subject: RE: Communication issue between zookeeper and accumulo
>>>
>>>   And iptables?****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [
>>> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
>>> *On Behalf Of *Ray Pfaff
>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 06, 2013 12:54 PM
>>> *To:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> *Subject:* Re: Communication issue between zookeeper and accumulo****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> Yes, it is disabled, so that's not the problem.****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> *From: *Sean Busbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> *Reply-To: *"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> *Date: *Tuesday, August 6, 2013 12:48 PM
>>> *To: *Accumulo User List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> *Subject: *Re: Communication issue between zookeeper and accumulo****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> Hi Ray! ****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> Can you confirm that IPv6 is disabled?****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Ray Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:****
>>>
>>> I'm not sure if I can provide those due to the contract I'm working.  I
>>> really don't want to diverge this conversation from the original question
>>> I'm asking (which is a problem even running one tablet server per machine)
>>> but are you saying that setting tserver.port.search = true shouldn't be
>>> done?  I found this to be an undocumented way of running more than one
>>> tablet server per system.  I'm still not convinced that this leads to
>>> stability issues on tablet servers.  As I said, it's undocumented.****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> *From: *Eric Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> *Reply-To: *"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>****
>>>
>>> *Date: *Tuesday, August 6, 2013 11:12 AM ****
>>>
>>>
Sean
+
Ray Pfaff 2013-08-08, 14:03
+
Keith Turner 2013-08-08, 15:16
+
Ray Pfaff 2013-08-08, 15:23
+
Ray Pfaff 2013-08-08, 13:07
+
Ott, Charles H. 2013-08-06, 14:48