Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
Accumulo >> mail # user >> Communication issue between zookeeper and accumulo


+
Ray Pfaff 2013-08-06, 14:38
+
Eric Newton 2013-08-06, 14:56
+
Ray Pfaff 2013-08-06, 15:00
+
Eric Newton 2013-08-06, 15:12
+
Ray Pfaff 2013-08-06, 16:19
+
Sean Busbey 2013-08-06, 16:48
+
Ray Pfaff 2013-08-06, 16:53
+
Ott, Charles H. 2013-08-06, 17:18
+
Ray Pfaff 2013-08-06, 17:25
+
Brendan Heussler 2013-08-06, 17:27
+
Ray Pfaff 2013-08-06, 17:33
+
Sean Busbey 2013-08-06, 17:35
+
Ray Pfaff 2013-08-06, 17:40
+
Eric Newton 2013-08-07, 18:09
+
Ray Pfaff 2013-08-07, 18:27
Copy link to this message
-
Re: Communication issue between zookeeper and accumulo
Can you post the full logs from the tablet servers somewhere and send a
link?

On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Ray Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>  It's from one of the tablet servers, but looking at one of the zookeeper
> servers, it's exactly the same
>
>   From: Sean Busbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tuesday, August 6, 2013 1:35 PM
>
> To: Accumulo User List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Communication issue between zookeeper and accumulo
>
>   Is that on the ZK server or the TabletServer? Can we also see the
> other?
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Ray Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>  Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT)
>> target     prot opt source               destination
>> ACCEPT     tcp  --  anywhere             anywhere            tcp dpt:ssh
>> ACCEPT     icmp --  anywhere             anywhere            icmp
>> echo-reply
>> ACCEPT     icmp --  anywhere             anywhere            icmp
>> echo-request
>> ACCEPT     tcp  --  anywhere             anywhere            tcp dpt:nrpe
>> ACCEPT     udp  --  anywhere             anywhere            udp
>> dpt:domain
>>
>>  Chain FORWARD (policy DROP)
>> target     prot opt source               destination
>>
>>  Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT)
>> target     prot opt source               destination
>>
>>   From: Brendan Heussler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Reply-To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Date: Tuesday, August 6, 2013 1:27 PM
>> To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> Subject: Re: Communication issue between zookeeper and accumulo
>>
>>   What is the output of iptables --list?
>>
>>
>>
>> Brendan
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Ray Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>  Not sure what you mean.  I get the error "Fatal ip6_tables not found."
>>>  I'm assuming that means disabled?
>>>
>>>   From: <Ott>, "Charles H." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Reply-To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Date: Tuesday, August 6, 2013 1:18 PM
>>> To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Subject: RE: Communication issue between zookeeper and accumulo
>>>
>>>   And iptables?****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [
>>> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
>>> *On Behalf Of *Ray Pfaff
>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 06, 2013 12:54 PM
>>> *To:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> *Subject:* Re: Communication issue between zookeeper and accumulo****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> Yes, it is disabled, so that's not the problem.****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> *From: *Sean Busbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> *Reply-To: *"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> *Date: *Tuesday, August 6, 2013 12:48 PM
>>> *To: *Accumulo User List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> *Subject: *Re: Communication issue between zookeeper and accumulo****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> Hi Ray! ****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> Can you confirm that IPv6 is disabled?****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Ray Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:****
>>>
>>> I'm not sure if I can provide those due to the contract I'm working.  I
>>> really don't want to diverge this conversation from the original question
>>> I'm asking (which is a problem even running one tablet server per machine)
>>> but are you saying that setting tserver.port.search = true shouldn't be
>>> done?  I found this to be an undocumented way of running more than one
>>> tablet server per system.  I'm still not convinced that this leads to
>>> stability issues on tablet servers.  As I said, it's undocumented.****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> *From: *Eric Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> *Reply-To: *"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>****
>>>
>>> *Date: *Tuesday, August 6, 2013 11:12 AM ****
>>>
>>>
Sean
+
Ray Pfaff 2013-08-08, 14:03
+
Keith Turner 2013-08-08, 15:16
+
Ray Pfaff 2013-08-08, 15:23
+
Ray Pfaff 2013-08-08, 13:07
+
Ott, Charles H. 2013-08-06, 14:48
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB