Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
Zookeeper >> mail # dev >> Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.4.5 (candidate 0)


+
Hanno Schlichting 2012-10-02, 15:20
+
Michi Mutsuzaki 2012-10-02, 19:35
+
Stack 2012-10-02, 05:40
+
Patrick Hunt 2012-10-04, 06:34
+
Patrick Hunt 2012-10-04, 23:13
+
Ted Yu 2012-10-04, 23:10
+
Mahadev Konar 2012-10-04, 23:15
+
Ted Yu 2012-10-05, 00:04
+
Patrick Hunt 2012-10-05, 00:07
+
Patrick Hunt 2012-10-05, 06:17
+
Patrick Hunt 2012-10-05, 16:56
+
Ted Yu 2012-10-06, 03:55
+
Ted Yu 2012-10-06, 03:58
+
Patrick Hunt 2012-10-06, 14:06
+
Ted Yu 2012-10-06, 14:16
+
Ted Yu 2012-10-06, 21:25
+
Patrick Hunt 2012-10-07, 13:56
+
Ted Yu 2012-10-07, 15:34
+
Patrick Hunt 2012-10-08, 05:17
+
Patrick Hunt 2012-10-08, 16:05
+
Patrick Hunt 2012-10-08, 23:17
+
Mahadev Konar 2012-10-08, 05:05
+
Patrick Hunt 2012-10-08, 05:19
Copy link to this message
-
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.4.5 (candidate 0)
+1

-Flavio

On Oct 8, 2012, at 7:05 AM, Mahadev Konar wrote:

> Given Eugene's findings on ZOOKEEPER-1557, I think we can continue
> rolling the current RC out. Others please vote on the thread if you
> see any issues with that. Folks who have already voted, please re vote
> in case you have a change of opinion.
>
> As for myself, I ran a couple of tests with the RC using open jdk 7
> and things seem to work.
>
> +1 from my side. Pat/Ben/Flavio/others what do you guys think?
>
> thanks
> mahadev
>
> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Currently ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 and ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7 are using
>> lock ZooKeeper-solaris.
>> I think ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 and ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7 should use
>> a separate lock since they wouldn't run on a Solaris machine.
>> I didn't seem to find how a new lock name can be added.
>>
>> Recent builds for ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 and ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7
>> have been green.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> I've seen that before, it's a flakey test that's unrelated to the sasl
>>> stuff.
>>>
>>> Patrick
>>>
>>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> I saw one test failure:
>>>>
>>>>
>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7/9/testReport/org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum/QuorumPeerMainTest/testHighestZxidJoinLate/
>>>>
>>>> FYI
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 7:16 AM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Up in ZOOKEEPER-1557, Eugene separated one test out and test failure
>>> seems
>>>>> to be gone.
>>>>>
>>>>> For ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7, the two failed builds:
>>>>> #10 corresponded to ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 build #7,
>>>>> #8 corresponded to ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 build #5
>>>>> where tests failed due to BindException
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes. Those ubuntu machines have two slots each. If both tests run at
>>>>>> the same time... bam.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I just added exclusion locks to the configuration of these two jobs,
>>>>>> that should help.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>>> I think that was due to the following running on the same machine at
>>> the
>>>>>>> same time:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Building remotely on ubuntu4
>>>>>>> <https://builds.apache.org/computer/ubuntu4> in workspace
>>>>>>> /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We should introduce randomized port so that test suite can execute in
>>>>>>> parallel.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Some tests failed in build 8 due to (See
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7/8/testReport/org.apache.zookeeper.server/ZxidRolloverTest/testRolloverThenRestart/
>>>>>> ):
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> java.lang.RuntimeException: java.net.BindException: Address already
>>> in
>>>>>> use
>>>>>>>>      at
>>>>>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.<init>(QuorumUtil.java:118)
>>>>>>>>      at
>>>>>>
>>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.ZxidRolloverTest.setUp(ZxidRolloverTest.java:63)
>>>>>>>> Caused by: java.net.BindException: Address already in use
>>>>>>>>      at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind0(Native Method)
>>>>>>>>      at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:344)
>>>>>>>>      at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:336)
>>>>>>>>      at
>>>>>>
>>> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.bind(ServerSocketChannelImpl.java:199)
>>>>>>>>      at
>>>>>> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:74)
>>>>>>>>      at
>>>>>> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:67)
>>>>>>>>      at
>>>>>>
>>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.NIOServerCnxnFactory.configure(NIOServerCnxnFactory.java:95)
+
Mahadev Konar 2012-10-11, 05:38
+
Alexander Shraer 2012-10-11, 21:42
+
Mahadev Konar 2012-10-11, 21:45
+
Ted Yu 2012-10-12, 20:12
+
Mahadev Konar 2012-10-12, 20:28
+
Alexander Shraer 2012-10-11, 21:47
+
Patrick Hunt 2012-10-05, 17:39
+
Mahadev Konar 2012-11-05, 08:20