Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Accumulo >> mail # dev >> git vs. svn


Copy link to this message
-
Re: git vs. svn
Personally, I like to use git for my development.

I know that other projects in apache commit to a main svn, but have a branch
git that people can pull from. See
http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Hbase/HowToContribute where they mention that
they have an apache git that mirrors the svn.

-Jesse Yates

On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Adam Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I've heard a lot of people express a preference for git over svn. What do
> people think about the prospect of using git (presumably on github) rather
> than Apache's svn servers for Accumulo? Would this be compatible with the
> other Apache infrastructure we would like to use (jira, confluence, etc.)?
> Has any other Apache project gone this route?
>
> Adam
>
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB