Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Pig, mail # dev - pig 0.11 candidate 2 feedback: Several problems


Copy link to this message
-
Re: pig 0.11 candidate 2 feedback: Several problems
Dmitriy Ryaboy 2013-03-02, 03:00
I'd like to get the gc fix in as well, but looks like Rohini is about to commit it so we are good there.

On Mar 1, 2013, at 11:33 AM, Bill Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> +1 to releasing Pig 0.11.1 when this is addressed. I should be able to help
> with the release again.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Prashant Kommireddi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>> Hey Guys,
>>
>> I wanted to start a conversation on this again. If Kai is not looking at
>> PIG-3194 I can start working on it to get 0.11 compatible with 20.2. If
>> everyone agrees, we should roll out 0.11.1 sooner than usual and I
>> volunteer to help with it in anyway possible.
>>
>> Any objections to getting 0.11.1 out soon after 3194 is fixed?
>>
>> -Prashant
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Russell Jurney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> wrote:
>>
>>> I stand corrected. Cool, 0.11 is good!
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Just a unrelated note: The CDH3 is more closer to Hadoop 1.x than to
>>> 0.20.
>>>>
>>>> Jarcec
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:04:51PM -0800, Dmitriy Ryaboy wrote:
>>>>> I agree -- this is a good release. The bugs Kai pointed out should be
>>>>> fixed, but as they are not critical regressions, we can fix them in
>>>> 0.11.1
>>>>> (if someone wants to roll 0.11.1 the minute these fixes are
>> committed,
>>> I
>>>>> won't mind and will dutifully vote for the release).
>>>>>
>>>>> I think the Hadoop 20.2 incompatibility is unfortunate but iirc this
>> is
>>>>> fixable by setting HADOOP_USER_CLASSPATH_FIRST=true (was that in
>> 20.2?)
>>>>>
>>>>> FWIW Twitter's running CDH3 and this release works in our
>> environment.
>>>>>
>>>>> At this point things that block a release are critical regressions in
>>>>> performance or correctness.
>>>>>
>>>>> D
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Alan Gates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> No.  Bugs like these are supposed to be found and fixed after we
>>> branch
>>>>>> from trunk (which happened several months ago in the case of 0.11).
>>>> The
>>>>>> point of RCs are to check that it's a good build, licenses are
>> right,
>>>> etc.
>>>>>> Any bugs found this late in the game have to be seen as failures
>> of
>>>>>> earlier testing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Alan.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Feb 20, 2013, at 11:33 AM, Russell Jurney wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Isn't the point of an RC to find and fix bugs like these>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Bill Graham <
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regarding Pig 11 rc2, I propose we continue with the current
>> vote
>>>> as is
>>>>>>>> (which closes today EOD). Patches for 0.20.2 issues can be
>> rolled
>>>> into a
>>>>>>>> Pig 0.11.1 release whenever they're available and tested.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Olga Natkovich <
>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I agree that supporting as much as we can is a good goal. The
>>>> issue is
>>>>>>>> who
>>>>>>>>> is going to be testing against all these versions? We found the
>>>> issues
>>>>>>>>> under discussion because of a customer report, not because we
>>>>>>>> consistently
>>>>>>>>> test against all versions. Perhaps when we decide which
>> versions
>>> to
>>>>>>>> support
>>>>>>>>> for next release we need also to agree who is going to be
>> testing
>>>> and
>>>>>>>>> maintaining compatibility with a particular version.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> For instance since Hadoop 23 compatibility is important for us
>> at
>>>> Yahoo
>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>> have been maintaining compatibility with this version for 0.9,
>>>> 0.10 and
>>>>>>>>> will do the same for 0.11 and going forward. I think we would
>>> need
>>>>>> others
>>>>>>>>> to step in and claim the versions of their interest.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Olga
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>>>>>> From