Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
HBase >> mail # dev >> [VOTE] The 1st hbase 0.94.7 release candidate is available for download


Copy link to this message
-
Re: [VOTE] The 1st hbase 0.94.7 release candidate is available for download
Doesn't matter. I created the 0.94.7RC1 tag from the 0.94 branch as of revision r1468999.
-- Lars
________________________________
From: lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 5:55 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] The 1st hbase 0.94.7 release candidate is available for download
On that note. Did somebody delete the 0.94.7RC0 tag from svn?

________________________________
From: Andrew Purtell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 5:52 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] The 1st hbase 0.94.7 release candidate is available for download
Concur, I'm fine with carrying over my +1 to a new RC that you assert has
just licence header changes.
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 5:51 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I have no strong preference. #3 is the most expedient way to get the
> release out.
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>  From: Jonathan Hsieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; lars hofhansl <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 5:15 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] The 1st hbase 0.94.7 release candidate is available
> for download
>
>
>
> I prefer #3 and then #2.  License stuff is not something we should be fast
> and loose with.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 5:08 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Arrghhh :)
> >
> >I had just sent an email to try to close the vote.
> >The vote in the next rc is only abridged if we do not pull in any changes
> made since the last RC (i.e. we can't use the 0.94 branch for the RC).
> >Which means we would have to selectively apply this change onto the
> 0.94.7RC0 branch.
> >
> >Since the rat stuff isn't new. Can we do this in 0.94.8?
> >
> >So we have three options (in order of my preference):
> >1. Ship the RC and fix HBASE-8427 in 0.94.8.
> 2. Roll a new RC from the 0.94 branch with all the recent changes
> (including HBASE-8427), and do a full 1-week vote.
> >3. Apply HBASE-8427 on the 0.94.7RC0 tag and roll a new RC from there
> with a 1-day vote.
> >
> >
> >-- Lars
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >
> >From: Jonathan Hsieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Cc: lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 4:54 PM
> >Subject: Re: [VOTE] The 1st hbase 0.94.7 release candidate is available
> for download
> >
> >
> >Sorry to do this but:
> >
> >-1.  Our rat setup was broken and we have a few source files with broken
> >apache licenses.
> >
> >See HBASE-8427.  Since isn't a functional change, I'm fine if we have an
> >extremely abridged vote on the next rc.
> >
> >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8427<
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8427?focusedCommentId=13641177&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-13641193
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Andrew Purtell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> I've been running the RC for a few days doing various things in an
> >> all-localhost configuration with a 70 region table (~70 GB data)
> containing
> >> 120 M tweets. Basic testing with LoadTestTool up front also looked good,
> >> nothing untoward in the logs.
> >>
> >> +1
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:40 AM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> > The 1st 0.94.7 RC is available for download at
> >> > http://people.apache.org/~larsh/hbase-0.94.7-rc0/
> >> >
> >> > Signed with my code signing key: C7CFE328
> >> >
> >> > This RC has 71 issues resolved against it, contributed by 27
> individuals.
> >> > 0.94.7 is primarily a bug fix release. Notable exceptions include:
> >> > HBASE-8176 Dynamic Schema Configurations
> >> > HBASE-7801 Allow a deferred sync option per Mutation
> >> >
> >> > The full list of changes is available here:
> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE/fixforversion/12324039

Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)