Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
HDFS >> mail # dev >> Issue with my username on my company provided dev box? (Was: …)


+
Arun C Murthy 2014-01-30, 03:31
+
Andrew Purtell 2014-01-30, 16:43
+
Stack 2014-01-30, 19:32
+
Mohammad Islam 2014-01-31, 00:45
+
Roman Shaposhnik 2014-01-31, 01:12
Copy link to this message
-
Re: Issue with my username on my company provided dev box? (Was: …)
Thanks Mohammed for the suggestion though I will say you must have a bit of
a perverse streak if you consider this 'enjoyment' -- smile.

Going back to the issue of "username" in our version string, it looks like
Arun won't have to buy a new machine after all. HADOOP-10313 just got
checked in, a script to build release bits up on our shared Apache
infrastructure.

Yours,
St.Ack
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Mohammad Islam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I was "enjoying" this discussion from the
> sideline.
>
> I strongly believe the issue could be resolved
> through in-person discussion of the related parties and move forward.
> After that meeting, a synopsis email could be sent
> if that would help and fit the bigger community.
>
> Regards,
> Mohammad
>
>
>
> On Thursday, January 30, 2014 11:32 AM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Arun C Murthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Stack,
> >
> >  Apologies for the late response, I just saw this.
> >
> > On Jan 29, 2014, at 3:33 PM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Slightly related, I just ran into this looking back at my 2.2.0 download:
> >
> > [stack@c2020 hadoop-2.2.0]$ ./bin/hadoop version
> > Hadoop 2.2.0
> > Subversion https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common -r 1529768
> > Compiled by hortonmu on 2013-10-07T06:28Z
> > ...
> >
> > Does the apache binary have to be compiled by 'hortonmu'?   Could it be
> > compiled by 'arun', or 'apachemu'?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > St.Ack
> >
> >
> >  Thank you for tarring all my work here with a brush by insinuating not
> > sure what for using my company provided dev machine to work on Hadoop.
> >
> >
>
> What is up Arun?  A basic query gets warped unrecognizably and given a
> dirty taint.  This in spite of us 'knowing' each other and having worked
> together for years now on this stuff.
>
> While it is true that I changed employers recently, my allegiance when
> around these parts has always been to Apache. I've had a few different
> employers during my time contributing to Hadoop (This is my 4th). I
> challenge you  to find anything in my record that has me rah rah-ing my
> current or previous employers.
>
>
>
> >  I'll try find a non-company provided dev machine to create future
> builds,
> > it might take some time because I'll have to go purchase another one. Or,
> > maybe, another option is to legally change my name.
> >
> >
> Lets chat before you go to such a radical extreme.  In another thread, it
> is implied that changing the build user would be a simple enough affair --
> but I know nothing of your infrastructure.
>
>
>
> >  Meanwhile, while we are on this topic, I just did:
> >
> >  $ git clone git://git.apache.org/hbase.git
> >  $ grep -ri cloudera *
> >
> >  Should I file a jira to fix all refs including the following imports of
> > org.cloudera.* (pasted below) … can you please help fix that? There are
> > more, but I'll leave it to your discretion. Compared to my username on my
> > company provided dev. box, this seems far more egregious. Do you agree?
> >
> >
> This is another project including a third-party project.  That seems like a
> tenuous connection to me but no problem if you would put it in the same
> bucket.  We can file an issue, or probably better as a precursor, get to a
> place where we can discuss these concerns in a civil manner and then file
> the agreed-upon issues to fix (We need this lib to add tracing to hdfs IMO
> -- so if this is in the way of its making it in, lets fix).
>
>
>
> >  In future, it might be useful to focus our efforts on moving the project
> > forward by contributing/reviewing code/docs etc., rather than on petty
> > things like usernames.
> >
> >
> This is a common theme, that the issues I raise are 'petty' or 'trifles'
> but I have trouble reconciling this assertion with the counter reaction
> raised. You react as though I were throwing molotov cocktails.
>
>
> Thanks,
> St.Ack
>