Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Hadoop, mail # dev - [VOTE] Hadoop 1.1.2-rc5 release candidate vote


Copy link to this message
-
Re: [VOTE] Hadoop 1.1.2-rc5 release candidate vote
Chris Nauroth 2013-02-09, 18:16
+1 non-binding (just restating my vote for the new round of voting)

Thanks,
--Chris
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> Hey Matt,
>
>   http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#what
>
> A tag is not release artifact, we don't vote on a tag.
>
> Yes, http://people.apache.org/~mattf/hadoop-1.1.2-rc5/hadoop-1.1.2.tar.gz
> contains sources, but not all, cannot build from that source tree, it
> does
> not have the build.xml.
>
> I think we should make that src/ dir to be complete so you can build from
> there. Or, we should have another SRC TARBALL as we do have in Hadoop2
> which is nothing but the whole (buildable) source.
>
> Cheers
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Matt Foley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > >> official release artifacts MUST be source artifacts
> > That's why the release is tagged in SVN source tree.  Nominally, that's
> > what you're really voting on.  The release artifacts are indeed for the
> > convenience of reviewers.
> >
> > However, the non-binary tarball (
> > http://people.apache.org/~mattf/hadoop-1.1.2-rc5/hadoop-1.1.2.tar.gz )
> > includes the "src/" directory, which contains the full Apache sources.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > --Matt
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Alejandro Abdelnur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > AFAIK, official release artifacts MUST be source artifacts, binary
> > > artifacts are convenience ones. The vote should be on source artifacts.
> > >
> > >
> > > Thx
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Chris Douglas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (binding)
> > > >
> > > > Looks like your key isn't in the file:
> > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/dist/KEYS Could you
> add
> > > > it? Signature is good (from pgp.mit.edu) and checksums match. Ran
> some
> > > > of the unit tests, looked through the changelog and repo log, looks
> > > > good.
> > > >
> > > > There's a -bin target and another tarball with docs, but I don't see
> a
> > > > source tarball. It's useful to have these artifacts available, but
> > > > technically we're supposed to be approving source code, not builds...
> > > > -C
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 7:13 PM, Matt Foley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > > > (resending with modified Subject line for RC5)
> > > > >
> > > > > Hadoop-1.1.2-rc4 is withdrawn.
> > > > >
> > > > > Hadoop-1.1.2-rc5 is available at
> > > > > http://people.apache.org/~mattf/hadoop-1.1.2-rc5/
> > > > > or in SVN at
> > > > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/common/tags/release-1.1.2-rc5/
> > > > > or in the Maven repo.
> > > > >
> > > > > This candidate for a stabilization release of the Hadoop-1.1 branch
> > has
> > > > 24
> > > > > patches and several cleanups compared to the Hadoop-1.1.1 release.
> > > >  Release
> > > > > notes are available at
> > > > > http://people.apache.org/~mattf/hadoop-1.1.2-rc5/releasenotes.html
> > > > >
> > > > > Please vote for this as the next release of Hadoop-1.  Voting will
> > > close
> > > > > next Thursday, 7 Feb, at 3:00pm PST.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > --Matt
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Chris Nauroth <
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >  HDFS-4423 has been committed to branch-1.  Thank you, Matt.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> --Chris
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Matt Foley <
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > Hi Chris,
> > > > >> > Okay, please get it in as soon as possible, and I'll respin the
> > > build.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Suresh, can you code review?
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Thanks,
> > > > >> > --Matt
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Chris Nauroth <
> > > > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >> > >wrote:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > Hello Matt,
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Would it be better to wait for committing the fix of blocker
> > > > HDFS-4423: