Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Pig >> mail # user >> [DISCUSS] Apache Pig bylaws


Copy link to this message
-
RE: [DISCUSS] Apache Pig bylaws
On the consensus issue, should we check how other projects do this?

Olga

-----Original Message-----
From: Alan Gates [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 10:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Pig bylaws
On Sep 28, 2010, at 4:39 PM, Olga Natkovich wrote:

> Alan,
>
> Thanks for the proposal. Looks good! I have a couple of comments/
> questions:
>
> (1) I think all votes need to have a time boundary. For releases and  
> committers, we used to use 3 business days. I am fine if we choose  
> different/longer times and different time periods for different  
> types of votes but I think we should state what they are in the  
> document.

Seems fine.  For votes that require everyone to vote is two weeks long  
enough?  It seems like all lazy votes can be 3 days.

> (2) Seems like consensus and even 2/3 votes is very hard to achieve.  
> I wonder if simple majority would do just as well for all the cases  
> we have.

Consensus votes are only prescribed for removing PMC members or  
committers.  Unanimity (minus the one being removed obviously) seems  
good in this case.  It prevents power blocks from developing and  
ensures that this only happens when it is obvious to everyone that it  
needs to happen.

2/3s votes are only required for new code bases (basically new  
subprojects) and modifications of the bylaws.  I'm ok with dropping  
this to simple majority if others agree.

Alan.

>
> Olga
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alan Gates [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 27, 2010 6:18 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [DISCUSS] Apache Pig bylaws
>
> As directed in our vote to become a TLP, we (Pig's PMC) need to set
> out bylaws for the project.  I have put up a first proposal for these
> by laws at http://wiki.apache.org/pig/ProposedByLaws.  Please take a
> look and give feedback.
>
> Alan.
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB