What about ACCUMULO-1009? Discussion seems to have settled down; no one
has told me there's anything wrong with the latest patch. Should 1.6 have
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 3:58 PM, John Vines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I chimed in on 802, there are a few items (API and error related) that
> should be resolved because if the feature ISN'T completed by release time,
> we'll have issues going forward.
> 210 - I need a better idea of what the remaining 5% is, but if it means
> moving packages around, particularly client packages, I would hold off for
> the same reason as above.
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm wondering if it would be prudent to go ahead and merge in the
> > ACCUMULO-210 and ACCUMULO-802 work, knowing it's only 95% complete, or
> > to push it at the last minute as I polish them up.
> > --
> > Christopher L Tubbs II
> > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
> > On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 2:37 PM, John Vines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > This is just a friendly reminder to the community that we have a slated
> > > code freeze for November 1. That gives us just two weeks until that
> > > deadline.