Hello HDFS devs,

Just a heads up we are trying out HDFS-3077 changes on branch-2. It
appears that only HDFS-3049, HDFS-3190, HDFS-3571, and HDFS-3573 are
needed on top of today's branch-2 head ahead of HDFS-3077 for the unit
tests to pass. On to cluster tests next.

--
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
Hein (via Tom White)

Hey Andy

Really glad you'll be testing this!

We should sync up on IRC - I can point you in the right direction as to
what should and shouldn't yet work, etc.

Of course, same offer goes to anyone else looking at it.

Todd

On Monday, July 23, 2012, Andrew Purtell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello HDFS devs,
>
> Just a heads up we are trying out HDFS-3077 changes on branch-2. It
> appears that only HDFS-3049, HDFS-3190, HDFS-3571, and HDFS-3573 are
> needed on top of today's branch-2 head ahead of HDFS-3077 for the unit
> tests to pass. On to cluster tests next.
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>    - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> Hein (via Tom White)
>

--
Todd Lipcon
Software Engineer, Cloudera

Hi Todd,

On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 10:33 PM, Todd Lipcon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Really glad you'll be testing this!
>
> We should sync up on IRC - I can point you in the right direction as to
> what should and shouldn't yet work, etc.
>
> Of course, same offer goes to anyone else looking at it.

Thanks for the generous offer. I've got meetings this morning but will
jump on freenode this afternoon. Come find me when you have a few
moments.

Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
Hein (via Tom White)