-Re: Effort towards Avro 2.0?
Doug Cutting 2013-12-12, 17:57
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 11:40 PM, Christophe Taton <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, I guess one can always handle such things externally to Avro.
This needn't be done externally.
When an extension schema is encountered, the schema compiler can generate
Object references, the DatumWriter can write the schema signature and
encode the object, and the DatumReader can locate the referenced schema and
create and deserialize the appropriate object. This behavior could be
compatibly added to the existing generic, specific and reflect
representations, since the extension schema is in Avro's namespace and
should thus not conflict with any user schema.
So this could be implemented compatibly. Until support is added in other
languages (Python, C, C++, etc.) these objects would be opaque, but no
matter how the feature is implemented it will require implementation work
in each language.