Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Flume >> mail # dev >> Generic JDBC Sink

Copy link to this message
Re: Generic JDBC Sink
  I am interested in a JDBC flume sink are you open sourcing it?
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 8:52 PM, Jeremy Karlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> Is there any interest in a generic JDBC sink?
> Over the few days I decided to try and write one.  I have something that
> requires more testing, but seems to be working.
> Since the config file is how you’d interact with it, here’s a working
> example from my source tree:
> a.sinks.k.type=jdbc
> a.sinks.k.channel=c
> a.sinks.k.driver=com.mysql.jdbc.Driver
> a.sinks.k.url=jdbc:mysql://localhost:8889/flume
> a.sinks.k.user=username
> a.sinks.k.password=password
> a.sinks.k.batchSize=100
> a.sinks.k.sql=insert into twitter (body, timestamp) values
> (${body:string}, ${header.timestamp:long})
> The interesting part is the SQL statement.  You can put anything you want
> in there - it will get converted to a prepared statement on execution.  The
> Ant-ish tokens get parsed and replaced with parameters at startup.
> The tokens are three part.  For example, in:
> ${body:string(UTF-8)}
> The first is a place in the event to get the value from (“body”,
> “header.foo”, or “custom”).  The second part ("string") is a type
> identifier that converts into an appropriate JDBC parameter.  The third
> part (“UTF-8") is a configuration string for that type, if needed.  As for
> types, so far I’ve defined:
> body: string (with optional charset encoding), bytearray
> header: string, long, int, float, double, date (with mandatory date format
> and optional timezone)
> Additionally, if none of those make you happy you can define you own
> parameter converters:
> ${custom:com.company.foo.MyConverter(optionaltextconfig)}
> I know there is still improvement to be made, but I’d like to get some
> feedback, bug fixes, and maybe get it included before I do a bunch of
> useless work.  If there is interest, how would you like it for review or
> inclusion?
>  -- Jeremy