AGGHH!

Let's not push out the general freeze even as far as sept 4th if  
possible.  I'd suggest oct 31st.  If we push out the general freeze  
until append is complete, we will delay having a stable release with  
append at least an additional month.

E14

> From: Nigel Daley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:30:55 -0700
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Push back code freeze for 0.21
>
>
> There's a 3rd option I'd support.  Feature freeze on Sept 4, except
> for Append which gets a 2 week extension.  This allows us to start
> stabilizing the rest of the code base while Append is finished up.
>
> Nige
>
> On Jul 24, 2009, at 4:25 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>
> > I second Konstantin's point: FI tests are likely to take a pretty
> > hefty chunk of overall dev. time. Considering that people'd be
> > facing a certain learning curve to master this new technology we are
> > likely to need more time for the completion of the development of
> > the code & tests.
> >
> > +1 for farther push back, e.g. until 9/18/09
> >
> > Konstantin (aka Cos)
> >
> > On 7/24/09 4:18 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote:
> >> I would like to clarify the append plans.
> >> Right now according to our planning schedule we need about
> >> 8 weeks to complete the implementation of the design.
> >> This will include all the functionality and unit testing
> >> according to the test plan.
> >>
> >> September 4 deadline gives us about 6 weeks to commit the features.
> >> Which is 2 weeks short off our schedule.
> >> This of course if the implementation will not go much faster than
> >> we predicted :-).
> >>
> >> So, we can either move the freeze a couple of weeks further ahead.
> >> Or we can also use some help from the people familiar with the
> >> design.
> >> E.g. there is a lot of hours scheduled to unit test writing using
> >> fault
> >> injection, etc.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> --Konstantin
> >>
> >> Amr Awadallah wrote:
> >>> +1 for stable append.
> >>>
> >>> -- amr
> >>>
> >>> Dhruba Borthakur wrote:
> >>>> +1
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 7/24/09, Jim Kellerman
> >>>> (POWERSET)<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> +1
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>>> From: Owen O'Malley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >>>>>> Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 1:11 PM
> >>>>>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>> Subject: [VOTE] Push back code freeze for 0.21
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I'd like to push the date for the code freeze back to 4
> >>>>>> September to
> >>>>>> give the file append more time to be finished well. Clearly,
> >>>>>> I'm +1.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -- Owen
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >
> > --
> > With best regards,
> >       Konstantin Boudnik (aka Cos)
> >
> >        Yahoo! Grid Computing
> >        +1 (408) 349-4049
> >
> > 2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616  6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622
> > Attention! Streams of consciousness are disallowed
> >
>
>
>
> ------ End of Forwarded Message

October?

On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Eric Baldeschwieler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

>  I'd suggest oct 31st.
--
Ted Dunning, CTO
DeepDyve

On Jul 24, 2009, at 5:11 PM, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote:

> AGGHH!
>
> Let's not push out the general freeze even as far as sept 4th if
> possible.  I'd suggest oct 31st.
>
You mean Aug 31?
sanjay
> If we push out the general freeze
> until append is complete, we will delay having a stable release with
> append at least an additional month.
>
> E14
>
>
>
> > From: Nigel Daley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:30:55 -0700
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Push back code freeze for 0.21
> >
> >
> > There's a 3rd option I'd support.  Feature freeze on Sept 4, except
> > for Append which gets a 2 week extension.  This allows us to start
> > stabilizing the rest of the code base while Append is finished up.
> >
> > Nige
> >
> > On Jul 24, 2009, at 4:25 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> >
> > > I second Konstantin's point: FI tests are likely to take a pretty
> > > hefty chunk of overall dev. time. Considering that people'd be
> > > facing a certain learning curve to master this new technology we  
> are
> > > likely to need more time for the completion of the development of
> > > the code & tests.
> > >
> > > +1 for farther push back, e.g. until 9/18/09
> > >
> > > Konstantin (aka Cos)
> > >
> > > On 7/24/09 4:18 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote:
> > >> I would like to clarify the append plans.
> > >> Right now according to our planning schedule we need about
> > >> 8 weeks to complete the implementation of the design.
> > >> This will include all the functionality and unit testing
> > >> according to the test plan.
> > >>
> > >> September 4 deadline gives us about 6 weeks to commit the  
> features.
> > >> Which is 2 weeks short off our schedule.
> > >> This of course if the implementation will not go much faster than
> > >> we predicted :-).
> > >>
> > >> So, we can either move the freeze a couple of weeks further  
> ahead.
> > >> Or we can also use some help from the people familiar with the
> > >> design.
> > >> E.g. there is a lot of hours scheduled to unit test writing using
> > >> fault
> > >> injection, etc.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> --Konstantin
> > >>
> > >> Amr Awadallah wrote:
> > >>> +1 for stable append.
> > >>>
> > >>> -- amr
> > >>>
> > >>> Dhruba Borthakur wrote:
> > >>>> +1
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On 7/24/09, Jim Kellerman
> > >>>> (POWERSET)<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> +1
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>>>>> From: Owen O'Malley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > >>>>>> Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 1:11 PM
> > >>>>>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>>>>> Subject: [VOTE] Push back code freeze for 0.21
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> I'd like to push the date for the code freeze back to 4
> > >>>>>> September to
> > >>>>>> give the file append more time to be finished well. Clearly,
> > >>>>>> I'm +1.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> -- Owen
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >
> > > --
> > > With best regards,
> > >       Konstantin Boudnik (aka Cos)
> > >
> > >        Yahoo! Grid Computing
> > >        +1 (408) 349-4049
> > >
> > > 2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616  6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622
> > > Attention! Streams of consciousness are disallowed
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------ End of Forwarded Message
>
>

I'd like to push the date for the code freeze back to 4 September to  
give the file append more time to be finished well. Clearly, I'm +1.

-- Owen

+1

Matei

On Jul 24, 2009, at 1:10 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:

> I'd like to push the date for the code freeze back to 4 September to  
> give the file append more time to be finished well. Clearly, I'm +1.
>
> -- Owen

+1 - having good stable append is crucial before we start working on 0.22
imo

-Todd

On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Matei Zaharia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> +1
>
> Matei
>
>
> On Jul 24, 2009, at 1:10 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
>
>  I'd like to push the date for the code freeze back to 4 September to give
>> the file append more time to be finished well. Clearly, I'm +1.
>>
>> -- Owen
>>
>
>

+1

Arun

On Jul 24, 2009, at 1:10 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:

> I'd like to push the date for the code freeze back to 4 September to  
> give the file append more time to be finished well. Clearly, I'm +1.
>
> -- Owen

+1

On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Arun C Murthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> +1
>
> Arun
>
> On Jul 24, 2009, at 1:10 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
>
>  I'd like to push the date for the code freeze back to 4 September to give
>> the file append more time to be finished well. Clearly, I'm +1.
>>
>> -- Owen
>>
>
>

+1.

Hairong
On 7/24/09 1:10 PM, "Owen O'Malley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I'd like to push the date for the code freeze back to 4 September to
> give the file append more time to be finished well. Clearly, I'm +1.
>
> -- Owen

+1

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Owen O'Malley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 1:11 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [VOTE] Push back code freeze for 0.21
>
> I'd like to push the date for the code freeze back to 4 September to
> give the file append more time to be finished well. Clearly, I'm +1.
>
> -- Owen

+1

On 7/24/09, Jim Kellerman (POWERSET) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Owen O'Malley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 1:11 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: [VOTE] Push back code freeze for 0.21
>>
>> I'd like to push the date for the code freeze back to 4 September to
>> give the file append more time to be finished well. Clearly, I'm +1.
>>
>> -- Owen
>
>

--
Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com

+1 for stable append.

-- amr

Dhruba Borthakur wrote:
> +1
>
>
>
>
>
> On 7/24/09, Jim Kellerman (POWERSET) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  
>> +1
>>
>>    
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Owen O'Malley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>> Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 1:11 PM
>>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Subject: [VOTE] Push back code freeze for 0.21
>>>
>>> I'd like to push the date for the code freeze back to 4 September to
>>> give the file append more time to be finished well. Clearly, I'm +1.
>>>
>>> -- Owen
>>>      
>>    
>
>  

I would like to clarify the append plans.
Right now according to our planning schedule we need about
8 weeks to complete the implementation of the design.
This will include all the functionality and unit testing
according to the test plan.

September 4 deadline gives us about 6 weeks to commit the features.
Which is 2 weeks short off our schedule.
This of course if the implementation will not go much faster than we predicted :-).

So, we can either move the freeze a couple of weeks further ahead.
Or we can also use some help from the people familiar with the design.
E.g. there is a lot of hours scheduled to unit test writing using fault
injection, etc.

Thanks,
--Konstantin

Amr Awadallah wrote:
> +1 for stable append.
>
> -- amr
>
> Dhruba Borthakur wrote:
>> +1
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 7/24/09, Jim Kellerman (POWERSET) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>  
>>> +1
>>>
>>>    
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Owen O'Malley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>>> Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 1:11 PM
>>>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> Subject: [VOTE] Push back code freeze for 0.21
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to push the date for the code freeze back to 4 September to
>>>> give the file append more time to be finished well. Clearly, I'm +1.
>>>>
>>>> -- Owen
>>>>      
>>>    
>>
>>  
>

I second Konstantin's point: FI tests are likely to take a pretty hefty chunk of
overall dev. time. Considering that people'd be facing a certain learning curve
to master this new technology we are likely to need more time for the completion
of the development of the code & tests.

+1 for farther push back, e.g. until 9/18/09

Konstantin (aka Cos)

On 7/24/09 4:18 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote:
> I would like to clarify the append plans.
> Right now according to our planning schedule we need about
> 8 weeks to complete the implementation of the design.
> This will include all the functionality and unit testing
> according to the test plan.
>
> September 4 deadline gives us about 6 weeks to commit the features.
> Which is 2 weeks short off our schedule.
> This of course if the implementation will not go much faster than we predicted :-).
>
> So, we can either move the freeze a couple of weeks further ahead.
> Or we can also use some help from the people familiar with the design.
> E.g. there is a lot of hours scheduled to unit test writing using fault
> injection, etc.
>
> Thanks,
> --Konstantin
>
> Amr Awadallah wrote:
>> +1 for stable append.
>>
>> -- amr
>>
>> Dhruba Borthakur wrote:
>>> +1
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 7/24/09, Jim Kellerman (POWERSET)<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Owen O'Malley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>>>> Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 1:11 PM
>>>>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> Subject: [VOTE] Push back code freeze for 0.21
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd like to push the date for the code freeze back to 4 September to
>>>>> give the file append more time to be finished well. Clearly, I'm +1.
>>>>>
>>>>> -- Owen
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>

--
With best regards,
Konstantin Boudnik (aka Cos)

         Yahoo! Grid Computing
         +1 (408) 349-4049

2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616  6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622
Attention! Streams of consciousness are disallowed

There's a 3rd option I'd support.  Feature freeze on Sept 4, except  
for Append which gets a 2 week extension.  This allows us to start  
stabilizing the rest of the code base while Append is finished up.

Nige

On Jul 24, 2009, at 4:25 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:

> I second Konstantin's point: FI tests are likely to take a pretty  
> hefty chunk of overall dev. time. Considering that people'd be  
> facing a certain learning curve to master this new technology we are  
> likely to need more time for the completion of the development of  
> the code & tests.
>
> +1 for farther push back, e.g. until 9/18/09
>
> Konstantin (aka Cos)
>
> On 7/24/09 4:18 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote:
>> I would like to clarify the append plans.
>> Right now according to our planning schedule we need about
>> 8 weeks to complete the implementation of the design.
>> This will include all the functionality and unit testing
>> according to the test plan.
>>
>> September 4 deadline gives us about 6 weeks to commit the features.
>> Which is 2 weeks short off our schedule.
>> This of course if the implementation will not go much faster than  
>> we predicted :-).
>>
>> So, we can either move the freeze a couple of weeks further ahead.
>> Or we can also use some help from the people familiar with the  
>> design.
>> E.g. there is a lot of hours scheduled to unit test writing using  
>> fault
>> injection, etc.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> --Konstantin
>>
>> Amr Awadallah wrote:
>>> +1 for stable append.
>>>
>>> -- amr
>>>
>>> Dhruba Borthakur wrote:
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 7/24/09, Jim Kellerman  
>>>> (POWERSET)<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: Owen O'Malley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>>>>> Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 1:11 PM
>>>>>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>> Subject: [VOTE] Push back code freeze for 0.21
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'd like to push the date for the code freeze back to 4  
>>>>>> September to
>>>>>> give the file append more time to be finished well. Clearly,  
>>>>>> I'm +1.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- Owen
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>
> --
> With best regards,
> Konstantin Boudnik (aka Cos)
>
>        Yahoo! Grid Computing
>        +1 (408) 349-4049
>
> 2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616  6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622
> Attention! Streams of consciousness are disallowed
>

+1

---
Jim Kellerman, Powerset (Live Search, Microsoft Corporation)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nigel Daley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 4:31 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Push back code freeze for 0.21
>
> There's a 3rd option I'd support.  Feature freeze on Sept 4, except
> for Append which gets a 2 week extension.  This allows us to start
> stabilizing the rest of the code base while Append is finished up.
>
> Nige
>
> On Jul 24, 2009, at 4:25 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>
> > I second Konstantin's point: FI tests are likely to take a pretty
> > hefty chunk of overall dev. time. Considering that people'd be
> > facing a certain learning curve to master this new technology we
> are
> > likely to need more time for the completion of the development of
> > the code & tests.
> >
> > +1 for farther push back, e.g. until 9/18/09
> >
> > Konstantin (aka Cos)
> >
> > On 7/24/09 4:18 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote:
> >> I would like to clarify the append plans.
> >> Right now according to our planning schedule we need about
> >> 8 weeks to complete the implementation of the design.
> >> This will include all the functionality and unit testing
> >> according to the test plan.
> >>
> >> September 4 deadline gives us about 6 weeks to commit the
> features.
> >> Which is 2 weeks short off our schedule.
> >> This of course if the implementation will not go much faster than
> >> we predicted :-).
> >>
> >> So, we can either move the freeze a couple of weeks further
> ahead.
> >> Or we can also use some help from the people familiar with the
> >> design.
> >> E.g. there is a lot of hours scheduled to unit test writing using
> >> fault
> >> injection, etc.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> --Konstantin
> >>
> >> Amr Awadallah wrote:
> >>> +1 for stable append.
> >>>
> >>> -- amr
> >>>
> >>> Dhruba Borthakur wrote:
> >>>> +1
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 7/24/09, Jim Kellerman
> >>>> (POWERSET)<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> +1
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>>> From: Owen O'Malley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >>>>>> Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 1:11 PM
> >>>>>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>> Subject: [VOTE] Push back code freeze for 0.21
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I'd like to push the date for the code freeze back to 4
> >>>>>> September to
> >>>>>> give the file append more time to be finished well. Clearly,
> >>>>>> I'm +1.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -- Owen
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >
> > --
> > With best regards,
> >       Konstantin Boudnik (aka Cos)
> >
> >        Yahoo! Grid Computing
> >        +1 (408) 349-4049
> >
> > 2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616  6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622
> > Attention! Streams of consciousness are disallowed
> >
>

+1

On 7/24/09 4:30 PM, Nigel Daley wrote:
> There's a 3rd option I'd support.  Feature freeze on Sept 4, except
> for Append which gets a 2 week extension.  This allows us to start
> stabilizing the rest of the code base while Append is finished up.
>
> Nige
>
> On Jul 24, 2009, at 4:25 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>
>> I second Konstantin's point: FI tests are likely to take a pretty
>> hefty chunk of overall dev. time. Considering that people'd be
>> facing a certain learning curve to master this new technology we are
>> likely to need more time for the completion of the development of
>> the code&  tests.
>>
>> +1 for farther push back, e.g. until 9/18/09
>>
>> Konstantin (aka Cos)
>>
>> On 7/24/09 4:18 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote:
>>> I would like to clarify the append plans.
>>> Right now according to our planning schedule we need about
>>> 8 weeks to complete the implementation of the design.
>>> This will include all the functionality and unit testing
>>> according to the test plan.
>>>
>>> September 4 deadline gives us about 6 weeks to commit the features.
>>> Which is 2 weeks short off our schedule.
>>> This of course if the implementation will not go much faster than
>>> we predicted :-).
>>>
>>> So, we can either move the freeze a couple of weeks further ahead.
>>> Or we can also use some help from the people familiar with the
>>> design.
>>> E.g. there is a lot of hours scheduled to unit test writing using
>>> fault
>>> injection, etc.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> --Konstantin
>>>
>>> Amr Awadallah wrote:
>>>> +1 for stable append.
>>>>
>>>> -- amr
>>>>
>>>> Dhruba Borthakur wrote:
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 7/24/09, Jim Kellerman
>>>>> (POWERSET)<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>> From: Owen O'Malley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>>>>>> Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 1:11 PM
>>>>>>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>> Subject: [VOTE] Push back code freeze for 0.21
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'd like to push the date for the code freeze back to 4
>>>>>>> September to
>>>>>>> give the file append more time to be finished well. Clearly,
>>>>>>> I'm +1.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -- Owen
>>>>>>>
>> --
>> With best regards,
>> Konstantin Boudnik (aka Cos)
>>
>>         Yahoo! Grid Computing
>>         +1 (408) 349-4049
>>
>> 2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616  6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622
>> Attention! Streams of consciousness are disallowed
>>
>

--
With best regards,
Konstantin Boudnik (aka Cos)

         Yahoo! Grid Computing
         +1 (408) 349-4049

2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616  6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622
Attention! Streams of consciousness are disallowed

+1 to the 3rd option.

-- amr

Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> +1
>
> On 7/24/09 4:30 PM, Nigel Daley wrote:
>> There's a 3rd option I'd support.  Feature freeze on Sept 4, except
>> for Append which gets a 2 week extension.  This allows us to start
>> stabilizing the rest of the code base while Append is finished up.
>>
>> Nige
>>
>> On Jul 24, 2009, at 4:25 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>>
>>> I second Konstantin's point: FI tests are likely to take a pretty
>>> hefty chunk of overall dev. time. Considering that people'd be
>>> facing a certain learning curve to master this new technology we are
>>> likely to need more time for the completion of the development of
>>> the code&  tests.
>>>
>>> +1 for farther push back, e.g. until 9/18/09
>>>
>>> Konstantin (aka Cos)
>>>
>>> On 7/24/09 4:18 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote:
>>>> I would like to clarify the append plans.
>>>> Right now according to our planning schedule we need about
>>>> 8 weeks to complete the implementation of the design.
>>>> This will include all the functionality and unit testing
>>>> according to the test plan.
>>>>
>>>> September 4 deadline gives us about 6 weeks to commit the features.
>>>> Which is 2 weeks short off our schedule.
>>>> This of course if the implementation will not go much faster than
>>>> we predicted :-).
>>>>
>>>> So, we can either move the freeze a couple of weeks further ahead.
>>>> Or we can also use some help from the people familiar with the
>>>> design.
>>>> E.g. there is a lot of hours scheduled to unit test writing using
>>>> fault
>>>> injection, etc.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> --Konstantin
>>>>
>>>> Amr Awadallah wrote:
>>>>> +1 for stable append.
>>>>>
>>>>> -- amr
>>>>>
>>>>> Dhruba Borthakur wrote:
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 7/24/09, Jim Kellerman
>>>>>> (POWERSET)<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>> From: Owen O'Malley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>>>>>>> Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 1:11 PM
>>>>>>>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>> Subject: [VOTE] Push back code freeze for 0.21
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'd like to push the date for the code freeze back to 4
>>>>>>>> September to
>>>>>>>> give the file append more time to be finished well. Clearly,
>>>>>>>> I'm +1.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -- Owen
>>>>>>>>
>>> --
>>> With best regards,
>>>     Konstantin Boudnik (aka Cos)
>>>
>>>         Yahoo! Grid Computing
>>>         +1 (408) 349-4049
>>>
>>> 2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616  6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622
>>> Attention! Streams of consciousness are disallowed
>>>
>>
>

+1

On Jul 25, 2009 1:31 AM, "Nigel Daley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

There's a 3rd option I'd support.  Feature freeze on Sept 4, except for
Append which gets a 2 week extension.  This allows us to start stabilizing
the rest of the code base while Append is finished up.

Nige

On Jul 24, 2009, at 4:25 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > I second
Konstantin's point: FI tests ar...