Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Pig, mail # dev - Re: What outstanding patches are must haves for 0.10? (path to a RC theater)


Copy link to this message
-
Re: What outstanding patches are must haves for 0.10? (path to a RC theater)
Alan Gates 2012-04-05, 05:48
+1.  Let's roll 0.10.

Alan.

On Apr 4, 2012, at 9:34 PM, Jon Coveney wrote:

> I think we got everything important in. Am excited
>
> On Apr 3, 2012, at 4:22 PM, Daniel Dai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Is everything ready now? Can we start the release process?
>>
>> Daniel
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Alan Gates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Sure, that's fine.
>>>
>>> Alan.
>>>
>>> On Mar 27, 2012, at 11:46 AM, Jonathan Coveney wrote:
>>>
>>>> I agree, Alan, though I think we should make the deadline Monday, 4/2. Most
>>>> testing is going to happen during the week anyway, and I'd like to give
>>>> true believers the weekend to fix up anything that is lacking.
>>>>
>>>> Sound ok?
>>>>
>>>> 2012/3/27 Alan Gates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>
>>>>> I propose we set a deadline and say patches need to be ready by that day,
>>>>> or they don't go in.  Otherwise this time next week there will be another
>>>>> set of patches people would like to see.  I'd say the deadline should be
>>>>> 3/30 (this Friday).  That would mean we could address any final test
>>>>> failures we see and start rolling the RC next week.
>>>>>
>>>>> Alan.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mar 27, 2012, at 12:00 AM, Jonathan Coveney wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Bill,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for going through those tickets. I marked them all as 0.10/0.11...
>>>>>> 2616 seems like the only critical one, and the others are nice to haves
>>>>> (I
>>>>>> imagine 2587and 2574 won't be super critical until we build out the
>>>>> systems
>>>>>> that rely on them). All of them look pretty close so I'd have no problem
>>>>>> with that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hopefully tomorrow others can weigh in on their priorities. Then we can
>>>>>> label things, work to finish them, and roll the RC.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2012/3/26 Daniel Dai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes, but CI anyway only run unit tests, we will have to run e2e test
>>>>>>> by ourselves.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Jonathan Coveney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Perhaps a big initiative for 0.11 could be to get the builds to the
>>>>> point
>>>>>>>> where flaky tests don't essentially gut the usefulness of the CI server
>>>>>>>> (Pig 0.9 hasn't passed in 6 months, etc). I'm not sure how difficult
>>>>> that
>>>>>>>> would be though, and what the benefit would be. But it's pretty
>>>>> annoying
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>> be able to wrap up a release when there are a bunch of "known useless"
>>>>>>>> tests.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2012/3/26 Daniel Dai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Once PIG-2317 check in, only document patch (PIG-2601) and some of
>>>>>>>>> Russell's patches left. Before roll up RC, we need to make sure all
>>>>>>>>> unit tests and e2e tests pass, I can help with this.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Daniel
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Jonathan Coveney <
>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> It's time to get serious about rolling an RC. 0.10 seems pretty
>>>>>>> strong...
>>>>>>>>>> are there any pressing JIRAs that people want to try and get in?
>>>>>>> Looking
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> the open JIRAs with a fix labeled of 0.10 (which is admittedly
>>>>>>> possibly
>>>>>>>>>> incomplete), it looks like there isn't anything terribly seriously
>>>>>>>>> left...
>>>>>>>>>> I'd love to get the ball rolling on an RC so we can test it and
>>>>>>> identify
>>>>>>>>>> any bugs.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>