Rahul Ravindran 2012-11-14, 01:52
Rahul Ravindran 2012-11-14, 20:46
Brock Noland 2012-11-14, 21:33
It would be round robin but not sticky sessions( so each request could Goto any random flume hop)
Sent from my phone.Excuse the terseness.
On Nov 14, 2012, at 1:33 PM, Brock Noland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I assume it would be connection based round robin? Might work just
> fine, but probably best to the use built-in support.
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Rahul Ravindran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Resending given I sent it during off-hours.
>> From: Rahul Ravindran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 5:52 PM
>> Subject: Flume hops behind HAProxy
>> Before I try it, I wanted to check if there were any known issues with
>> this. We will have multiple flume agents sending an Avro stream each to a
>> smaller set of intermediate flume hops. Are there any issues/concerns around
>> having the flume agents send their streams to an HAProxy which will round
>> robin between the different flume hops. Any issue around the transaction
>> mechanism with this setup?
>> I know that there is a selector mechanism in Flume to do this, but our
>> operations extensively use HAProxy, and are most familiar with it.
> Apache MRUnit - Unit testing MapReduce - http://incubator.apache.org/mrunit/
Camp, Roy 2012-11-14, 22:15
Rahul Ravindran 2012-11-14, 22:46
Brock Noland 2012-11-15, 02:20
Rahul Ravindran 2012-11-15, 17:27
Brock Noland 2012-11-15, 17:35