Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
Hadoop >> mail # general >> Hadoop 0.22/HBase 0.92 package repos are now available


+
Roman Shaposhnik 2011-09-28, 00:13
+
Konstantin Boudnik 2011-09-28, 01:26
+
J. Rottinghuis 2011-09-28, 04:55
+
Milind.Bhandarkar@... 2011-09-28, 18:54
+
Roman Shaposhnik 2011-09-29, 01:28
+
Brian Bockelman 2011-09-29, 02:24
+
Tom White 2011-09-29, 18:57
+
Roman Shaposhnik 2011-09-28, 17:45
+
Konstantin Boudnik 2011-09-29, 20:53
+
Milind.Bhandarkar@... 2011-09-29, 21:10
+
Roman Shaposhnik 2011-09-29, 22:52
+
Milind.Bhandarkar@... 2011-09-29, 23:29
+
Dmitriy Ryaboy 2011-09-29, 23:30
+
Milind.Bhandarkar@... 2011-09-29, 23:54
Copy link to this message
-
Re: Hadoop 0.22/HBase 0.92 package repos are now available
9.1 just went up for vote, and holding up a release to add 0.22
compatibility seems ill-advised.
I would be willing to help get 9.2 out in short order to provide
compatibility with 22, and I think Joep already did a bunch of work to make
this happen.

D

On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 4:54 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Dmitry,
>
> So, your suggestion would be to try and get 0.9.1 compatible with Hadoop
> 0.22 ? Would there be an interest from pig committers to see that through,
> as a 0.9.2 perhaps ?
>
> - Milind
>
> ---
> Milind Bhandarkar
> Greenplum Labs, EMC
> (Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this email are those of the author, and
> do not necessarily represent the views of any organization, past or
> present, the author might be affiliated with.)
>
>
>
> On 9/29/11 4:30 PM, "Dmitriy Ryaboy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Pig 8.2 is likely not going to happen (0 interest from any of the
> >committers).
> >
> >0.9 has already been released, 9.1 is in the works, as is 10.
> >
> >Not sure how Milind compiled that list of features in 0.9 but it's kind of
> >an odd grab-bag of 0.8 and 0.9 features.
> >
> >The MASSIVE improvement 0.9 introduced is macros. There are other things;
> >one unheralded in the 3 blog posts below is that handling of nested
> >structures is cleaned up a lot (in a subtly non-backwards-compatible way).
> >
> >http://www.hortonworks.com/new-apache-pig-features-part-1-macro/
> >http://www.hortonworks.com/new-apache-pig-features-part-2-embedding/
> >(note:
> >not udfs in other languages, that was already in 8).
> >
> http://www.hortonworks.com/new-apache-pig-0-9-features-part-3-additional-f
> >eatures/
> >
> >
> >On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >wrote:
> >
> >> 2011/9/29  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> > [CC'ng Pig-dev].
> >> >
> >> > In terms of interest, what is the community more interested in seeing
> >> work
> >> > with Hadoop 0.22 ? Pig 0.8.x or Pig.0.9.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > I took a look at pig 0.9 added features:
> >> >
> >> > New parser (still has corner cases)
> >> > UDFs in languages other than Java
> >> > Macros
> >> > Hcatalog support
> >> >
> >> > As far as existing installations are concerned, my belief is that
> >>these
> >> > features do not make a very compelling case for pig 0.9 to be
> >>compatible
> >> > immediately with Hadoop 0.22, and pig 0.8.x makes more sense.
> >> >
> >> > What do people think ?
> >>
> >> Personally, I'd like to see both of these code lines to have a
> >> compatibility
> >> releases to address 0.22/0.23 issues. Also, I'd be totally happy with
> >> 0.9 NOT addressing this issues if there's 0.10 planned soon enough.
> >>
> >> As for 0.8 I really, really, really would like to see a compatibility
> >> release.
> >> From the Bigtop side, I can help with build and testing, but I guess we
> >> need somebody from the Pig community to chime in on how feasible
> >> 0.8.2 will be.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Roman.
> >>
>
>
+
Milind.Bhandarkar@... 2011-09-30, 20:22