Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
HBase >> mail # dev >> requiring zookeeper 3.4.x in 0.96


+
Jesse Yates 2012-04-18, 20:33
+
lars hofhansl 2012-04-18, 20:48
Copy link to this message
-
Re: requiring zookeeper 3.4.x in 0.96
ZK 3.4.x still isn't marked "stable", so I'm a little hesitant to move
to requiring it just yet.

What tangible benefit do we gain from the "transactional" methods?

-Todd

On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 1:48 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Jesse Yates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc:
> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 1:33 PM
> Subject: requiring zookeeper 3.4.x in 0.96
>
> Hi all,
>
> I was working on some patches to make ZK a bit more sane using the
> transaction operations recently added (in jira:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-965
> <http://zookeeper.apache.org/doc/r3.4.3/api/org/apache/zookeeper/ZooKeeper.html#transaction%28%29>
> and in the api here:
> http://zookeeper.apache.org/doc/r3.4.3/api/org/apache/zookeeper/ZooKeeper.html#transaction%28%29).
> This takes care of a lot of race conditions, etc. that are inherently
> present in zk.
>
> Currently we (afaik) are not requiring ZooKeeper v.3.4.x in production and
> instead allow users to run down to at least 3.3.x with the hbase's  3.4.x
> client. Adding in transaction support will break this cross-version
> functionality without a way of falling back as ZK doesn't (afaik) support
> client-side look up of the server's version. Further, the fallback
> functionality would be very dangerous if we assume transactions but fall
> back to the non-transactional method; if we don't assume transactions, then
> the transactional method is just wasted effort.
>
> I'm proposing that in the singularity (0.96), when we move to requiring
> Hadoop v1.0+ we also make it a requirement that people run ZooKeeper v3.4+
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Thanks!
>
> -------------------
> Jesse Yates
> 240-888-2200
> @jesse_yates
> jyates.github.com
>

--
Todd Lipcon
Software Engineer, Cloudera
+
Jesse Yates 2012-04-18, 22:29
+
Todd Lipcon 2012-04-18, 22:34
+
Jesse Yates 2012-04-18, 22:45
+
Ted Yu 2012-04-18, 22:44
+
Stack 2012-04-18, 22:46
+
Andrew Purtell 2012-04-19, 01:41
+
Andrew Purtell 2012-04-19, 01:45
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB