Eric Yang 2010-10-17, 22:31
I agree that that part of the code is pretty snarly. Not sure how
urgent a priority it is to fix.
I think a better short-term goal might be doing a 0.5 release. How
close are we to that?
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Eric Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
> Chukwa agent code is not intuitive to understand. This is mainly the
> interface in Chukwa agent is over complicating the implementation. I
> don't see a rationale for having each class to be an interface.
> Connector and Chukwa Sender are two interfaces which are not very
> useful to be interface. It creates over complicated subsystem to
> maintain collector list in agent, connector and sender. Ideally,
> there should be a single place for configuration source of truth. I
> am leaning toward making those interface abstract classes. Connector
> should be rename to something more meaningful like multiplexer or MUX
> for short. AgentControlSocketListener could be refactor into a jersey
> like rest api, for easier to maintain the code base, and remove the
> 9093 protocol.
> This sounds like a major task. I like to gather feedback to see if
> this change is necessary for creating more traction on chukwa
Ari Rabkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
UC Berkeley Computer Science Department
Eric Yang 2010-10-18, 06:14
Bill Graham 2010-10-18, 15:21