abhijeet gaikwad 2012-10-31, 04:06
thank you very much for your note, I've never noticed such issue. You're right that using unreleased versions in "affected" field might be confusing for some users.
I was thinking about it and I personally do not incline to have "trunk" version. My reasoning is that then we might end up having situation like "affected: trunk", "fixed: 1.4.3", "current version: 1.4.4" which seems even more confusing to me :-). I kind of like your current solution by leaving the affected field blank when talking about unreleased code.
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 09:36:28AM +0530, abhijeet gaikwad wrote:
> Hi Devs,
> There are few cases in which I have observed that the affect versions for
> an issue is not any of the previously released versions, but somewhere
> between last version and current trunk. I personally have kept affect
> versions empty in such cases. So, just a thought - can we have 'trunk' as
> one of the version labels in JIRA?