-Re: [VOTE] BookKeeper 4.0.0 Release Candidate 1
Flavio Junqueira 2011-12-06, 15:41
I missed initially that the changes are only to the binary packages.
It doesn't sound like we need to call a new vote.
On Dec 6, 2011, at 4:17 PM, Flavio Junqueira wrote:
> I'm confused now. If you change the candidate files, then we have to
> call for a new vote, no?
> On Dec 6, 2011, at 11:49 AM, Ivan Kelly wrote:
>> I've updated the binary packages to include licenses for all included
>> jars. Attached for convenience.
>>> I'm not sure if this changed btw when Hadoop/ZK started and current
>>> documentation, notice that it says to include in the license file.
>>> What hadoop/zk do is to include individual license files in the
>>> directory, along side the jars themselves. We probably should change
>>> this in zk to be in compliance.
>> Individual license files will probably be hard to do in maven, as the
>> lib directory will not exist in the source.
> research scientist
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> direct +34 93-183-8828
> avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es
> phone (408) 349 3300 fax (408) 349 3301
direct +34 93-183-8828
avinguda diagonal 177, 8th floor, barcelona, 08018, es
phone (408) 349 3300 fax (408) 349 3301