Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
Drill >> mail # dev >> Tajo


+
Timothy Chen 2013-02-26, 08:31
+
goog cheng 2013-02-26, 11:25
+
Ted Dunning 2013-02-26, 18:09
+
Christopher Merrick 2013-02-26, 18:49
+
Jacques Nadeau 2013-02-26, 21:30
+
Christopher Merrick 2013-02-26, 21:56
+
Timothy Chen 2013-02-26, 22:00
I'd also urge the various groups to focus on building components/libraries, not whole systems. Components are re-usable if their interfaces are well designed. Open source is a force multiplier, but we lose a lot of that advantage if we don't design for re-use.

On Feb 26, 2013, at 1:30 PM, Jacques Nadeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I completely agree.  The more wood, the better. I've reached out to
> Hortonworks guys and am doing an in person preso to their team.  Hopefully
> that will help facilitate collaboration opportunities on Tez/Stinger and
> Drill.  I also am working on connecting with the Tajo guys to see what
> synergy is possible.
>
> To me, the biggest gap is going to be around differences in vision and
> execution strategy.  It seems like many of the systems being built or
> discussed tend to either defer or ignore some fairly important market or
> research trends.  Things like complex schema-lite data and columnar
> execution come to mind when looking at Tajo--there are others when looking
> at other projects.  Typically, the response is that they'll do these things
> later.  I applaud that response but question the feasibility.  These things
> often have fairly substantial underlying architectural implications that
> will be difficult to "fit-in" later.
>
> On the flipside, we are all resource constrained and the last thing that
> everybody should be doing is reinventing the same wheel. I hope that we can
> find places to share work.
>
> J
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Christopher Merrick <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Is there any reason why we shouldn't reach out and see if there's an
>> opportunity to join forces?  Between Drill, Impala, and the Hortonworks
>> Stinger initiative <http://hortonworks.com/blog/100x-faster-hive/> that I
>> just read about, there are plenty of different teams working on this
>> problem.  If their vision is really that similar to ours, I think it makes
>> sense to put more wood behind one arrow.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Ted Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Yeah... I don't see much difference either.
>>>
>>> I read their slides and they could be giving a Drill pitch for all I
>> could
>>> tell.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 12:31 AM, Timothy Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Not sure folks seen this?
>>>>
>>>> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/TajoProposal
>>>>
>>>> It also mentioned about Drill and how they claim to be different.
>>>>
>>>> Tim
>>>>
>>>
>>
+
Ted Dunning 2013-02-26, 21:55
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB