Dmitriy Ryaboy 2011-08-29, 22:46
Yup, that makes sense. Class returned by argToFuncMapping needs to implement
Algebraic instead of EvalFunc itself.
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 15:46, Dmitriy Ryaboy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Had a fun discovery today: a user tried to do the following (perfectly
> reasonable) thing:
> bag_sizes = foreach grouped_data genrate
> group, SIZE(grouped_data);
> .. and it was excessively slow, because SIZE is not algebraic.
> I had him switch to COUNT_STAR, and that worked, of course.
> But he reasonably pointed out that SIZE should work, too. It's documented
> work on bags, after all.
> I tried switching SIZE's argToFunc mapping to return
> COUNT_STAR.class.getName(), but discovered much to my dismay that algebraic
> optimization still does not get invoked.
> Presumably because we check if SIZE is instanceof Algebraic, instead of
> checking the class that's returned by argToFuncMapping.
> Is that about right? Do you guys agree that's a bug?
Dmitriy Ryaboy 2011-08-30, 21:24