I saw a message that the build is broken. However, I have been
compiling and running it all night. Over and over. I don't see what
the problem can be.

The auto-build process is over-constrained for resources.  We often have
false-positives for build failures.

-Eric

On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 10:17 PM, David Medinets
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> I saw a message that the build is broken. However, I have been
> compiling and running it all night. Over and over. I don't see what
> the problem can be.
>

On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Eric Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> The auto-build process is over-constrained for resources.  We often have
> false-positives for build failures.
>

Should I configure it not to fail the build if it times out?  I don't think
I can ask it to try again if it times out.

Billie

> -Eric
>
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 10:17 PM, David Medinets
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> > I saw a message that the build is broken. However, I have been
> > compiling and running it all night. Over and over. I don't see what
> > the problem can be.
> >
>

I say no. I'll  take 100 false positives over 1 false negative any day.
On Aug 29, 2012 8:21 AM, "Billie Rinaldi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Eric Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > The auto-build process is over-constrained for resources.  We often have
> > false-positives for build failures.
> >
>
> Should I configure it not to fail the build if it times out?  I don't think
> I can ask it to try again if it times out.
>
> Billie
>
>
>
> > -Eric
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 10:17 PM, David Medinets
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> >
> > > I saw a message that the build is broken. However, I have been
> > > compiling and running it all night. Over and over. I don't see what
> > > the problem can be.
> > >
> >
>

Is there a way, other than doing an svn commit, to starting the
auto-build process?

On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 9:30 AM, John Vines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I say no. I'll  take 100 false positives over 1 false negative any day.
> On Aug 29, 2012 8:21 AM, "Billie Rinaldi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Eric Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > The auto-build process is over-constrained for resources.  We often have
>> > false-positives for build failures.
>> >
>>
>> Should I configure it not to fail the build if it times out?  I don't think
>> I can ask it to try again if it times out.
>>
>> Billie
>>
>>
>>
>> > -Eric
>> >
>> > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 10:17 PM, David Medinets
>> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>> >
>> > > I saw a message that the build is broken. However, I have been
>> > > compiling and running it all night. Over and over. I don't see what
>> > > the problem can be.
>> > >
>> >
>>

On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 6:50 AM, David Medinets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> Is there a way, other than doing an svn commit, to starting the
> auto-build process?
>

Yes.  If you go to https://builds.apache.org/view/A-F/view/Accumulo/ and
log in with your ASF username and password, you can click "Build Now" on
one of our builds.  If you haven't done this before, you need to be added
to the hudson-jobadmin group to enable you to log in.  I can add people to
this group, so just let me know.

Billie

>
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 9:30 AM, John Vines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I say no. I'll  take 100 false positives over 1 false negative any day.
> > On Aug 29, 2012 8:21 AM, "Billie Rinaldi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Eric Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > The auto-build process is over-constrained for resources.  We often
> have
> >> > false-positives for build failures.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Should I configure it not to fail the build if it times out?  I don't
> think
> >> I can ask it to try again if it times out.
> >>
> >> Billie
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> > -Eric
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 10:17 PM, David Medinets
> >> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > I saw a message that the build is broken. However, I have been
> >> > > compiling and running it all night. Over and over. I don't see what
> >> > > the problem can be.
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
>