Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Accumulo >> mail # user >> [VOTE] 1.5.0-RC3

Copy link to this message
Re: [VOTE] 1.5.0-RC3
There were three options to dropping "assemble" from the binary
packages (ACCUMULO-1413):
1. Convoluted Maven patch:
that will probably cause more problems than it fixes, because it
rotates the dependency graph on its head (I actually made a drawing of
this to explain it to Keith).
2. Simple artifactId rename so binaries packages are renamed according
to the name of the project, because this is primarily what users will
3. Re-write and maintain our own source-release assembly descriptors,
overriding the upstream-defined one from the Apache parent POM.

I went with option 2, for the following reasons:
1. I was able to think of an artifactId that would make sense as an
artifactId for a source-release (accumulo-project).
2. It's more important that the unpacked binary release be consistent.
3. I don't want to maintain a second release assembly that can drift
from one defined upstream that *works*.
4. The source directory name and tarball don't really matter. Anybody
willing to compile from source is not going to be sufficiently
bothered by a slight naming convention difference in the root
directory of a tarball to deter them from unpacking that tarball and
building from source.
5. The file can always be renamed. If we need to automate unpacking
and repacking with a different file name (rather than maintain our own
custom source assembly), fine, but this seems wholly unnecessary.

Christopher L Tubbs II
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Adam Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How do HBase and a bazillion other apache projects do it? This really should
> not be too hard unless we are overly restricting our tool suit. If we have
> to add a two line script in mvn exec (nuclear option) to make the build look
> good we should do it.
> Adam
> On May 17, 2013 10:53 AM, "Billie Rinaldi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 7:35 AM, Adam Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Looks like the src part of the distribution is
>>> accumulo-project-1.5.0-src.tar.gz. For the same reasons that we removed the
>>> "assemble" tag form the bin package, shouldn't we remove the "project" tag
>>> from the src package? This also has implications as to whether we can just
>>> untar both the bin and src tars into the same directory and have them form
>>> voltron (instead of two different directories).
>> Adding "project" was apparently the only easy way to remove "assemble"
>> (see ACCUMULO-1413).  I guess since one is submodule of the other, maven
>> doesn't want to name them the same thing?
>> Billie
>>> Adam
>>> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 9:05 PM, Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> 1.5.0-RC3 for consideration.
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-007/
>>>> --
>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: Nexus Repository Manager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>> Date: Thu, May 16, 2013 at 9:02 PM
>>>> Subject: Nexus: Staging Completed.
>>>> To: Christopher Tubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>> Description:
>>>> 1.5.0-RC3
>>>> Details:
>>>> The following artifacts have been staged to the
>>>> org.apache.accumulo-007 (u:ctubbsii, a: repository.
>>>> archetype-catalog.xml
>>>> accumulo-1.5.0-bin.rpm.asc
>>>> accumulo-1.5.0-native.rpm.asc
>>>> accumulo-1.5.0-test.deb
>>>> accumulo-1.5.0-bin.tar.gz.asc
>>>> accumulo-1.5.0.pom
>>>> accumulo-1.5.0-native.rpm
>>>> accumulo-1.5.0.pom.asc
>>>> accumulo-1.5.0-test.rpm
>>>> accumulo-1.5.0-bin.deb
>>>> accumulo-1.5.0-bin.rpm
>>>> accumulo-1.5.0-bin.tar.gz
>>>> accumulo-1.5.0-native.deb
>>>> accumulo-1.5.0-test.rpm.asc
>>>> accumulo-1.5.0-bin.deb.asc
>>>> accumulo-1.5.0-test.deb.asc
>>>> accumulo-1.5.0-native.deb.asc
>>>> accumulo-examples-1.5.0.pom.asc