Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
Accumulo >> mail # dev >> Re: [VOTE] JDK 1.7 - Switch for Accumulo 1.6.0


+
Keith Turner 2013-06-03, 22:05
+
Adam Fuchs 2013-06-03, 21:49
+
Christopher 2013-06-03, 22:10
+
Christopher 2013-06-03, 22:23
+
Sean Busbey 2013-06-03, 22:31
+
Christopher 2013-06-03, 22:39
+
William Slacum 2013-06-03, 22:31
+
Keith Turner 2013-06-03, 22:22
+
Christopher 2013-06-03, 22:15
+
Josh Elser 2013-06-03, 21:04
+
Josh Elser 2013-06-03, 22:01
+
Sean Busbey 2013-06-03, 23:05
+
Dave Marion 2013-06-04, 00:54
+
Josh Elser 2013-06-04, 01:05
+
Ben Popp 2013-06-04, 02:37
+
Sean Busbey 2013-06-04, 12:21
+
John Vines 2013-06-04, 14:51
+
Christopher 2013-06-05, 17:54
+
John Vines 2013-06-05, 18:14
+
Adam Fuchs 2013-06-05, 18:20
+
Eric Newton 2013-06-05, 20:36
+
Christopher 2013-06-05, 20:42
+
Josh Elser 2013-06-05, 23:09
+
Mike Drob 2013-06-05, 23:25
+
David Medinets 2013-06-05, 23:29
+
Mike Drob 2013-06-05, 23:28
+
John Vines 2013-06-05, 23:12
+
Keith Turner 2013-06-05, 23:54
+
John Vines 2013-06-05, 22:09
+
Jason Trost 2013-06-05, 22:48
+
Sean Busbey 2013-06-05, 18:12
+
German Gutierrez 2013-06-06, 02:53
+
David Lyle 2013-06-06, 03:51
+
David Medinets 2013-06-06, 13:52
+
Billie Rinaldi 2013-06-06, 14:22
Copy link to this message
-
Re: [VOTE] JDK 1.7 - Switch for Accumulo 1.6.0
That would have also been my assumption since it was not otherwise
stated. However, given the nature of this vote, I believe non-binding
votes should also be carefully considered.

On 6/6/13 10:22 AM, Billie Rinaldi wrote:
> I would assume all our votes are "community welcome to vote, only
> committers binding."
>
> Billie
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 6:52 AM, David Medinets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>> Who is voting - the accumulo community, the PMC members, or some other
>> subset of people?
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 11:51 PM, David Lyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> -1 Prefer to stay on java 1.6 until pulled by features or eol.
>>>
>>> -D...
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 10:53 PM, German Gutierrez
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello Everyone,
>>>>
>>>> I vote for in favor.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> German A. Gutierrez
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> All-
>>>>>
>>>>> Please explicitly vote in favor or against changing the java
>>>>> dependency to >=1.7.
>>>>>
>>>>> Parsing vague "may cause..." or "might be..." concerns throughout the
>>>>> text of the thread is tedious, and does not help me know what the
>>>>> consensus of the group is, so we can move forward. If there's a
>>>>> specific issue that is informing your vote, that's great, feel free
>> to
>>>>> state it, but I don't want this issue to drag out for the duration of
>>>>> the the Accumulo 1.6.0 development cycle because people are reluctant
>>>>> to come to a concrete opinion.
>>>>>
>>>>> If it fails a vote, we'll revisit for Accumulo 1.7.0.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm personally in favor of the change (+1), but it's not a big deal
>> to
>>>>> me. I just want a concrete resolution.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>>>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 10:51 AM, John Vines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>>>>> I have also heard mulling about issues with the way Kerberos
>>>>> authentication
>>>>>> behaves with JDK1.7 for hadoop. This may also have implications on
>>> the
>>>>>> Accumulo implementation as well.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Sean Busbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 10:37 PM, Ben Popp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> CDH4 claims JDK 1.6 and 1.7 support:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> http://www.cloudera.com/content/cloudera-content/cloudera-docs/CDH4/latest/CDH4-Requirements-and-Supported-Versions/cdhrsv_topic_3.html
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> CDH4 comes with some additional caveats about 1.7:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> http://www.cloudera.com/content/cloudera-content/cloudera-docs/CDH4/latest/CDH4-Release-Notes/cdh4rn_topic_2_2.html?scroll=concept_c1n_bln_tj_unique_1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The biggest one being the disclaimer about 1.7 compiled code.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Sean
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
+
Christopher 2013-06-06, 18:09
+
Christopher 2013-06-07, 16:05
+
Sean Busbey 2013-06-06, 14:00