Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
HBase >> mail # dev >> 0.94 Backports.


Copy link to this message
-
Re: 0.94 Backports.
I'm aware of the comment history and timeline Ted. This is a general
request to consider being a little more deliberate. I don't care about
litigating what may or may not happened on this issue, but I think you can
allow me to register my concern. Thank you.
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> If you look at the comments in HBASE-7814, Lars' comment was logged at the
> same time as my notice of reversion:
>
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7814?focusedCommentId=13576253&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13576253
>
> FYI
>
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Andrew Purtell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > I'm also concerned that the revert happened here while discussion was
> > ongoing. Given the latest comments on the issue, this could have been
> > handled by a new issue that replaces the offending code with reflection.
> I
> > don't care about the revert per se but would ask we avoid making changes
> > out from under a discussion until the matter is resolved with consensus.
> We
> > will have cleaner revision history and less churn overall as a result. I
> > know many of us have to-do lists of HBase JIRAs to retire, but there is
> no
> > need to be hasty. Because we are all busy, unnecessary commit speed makes
> > it more likely mistakes like this will slip by review in the first place
> > too.
> >
> > For your consideration.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Ted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > No.
> > > The release was cut before the revert.
> > >
> > > On Feb 11, 2013, at 5:35 PM, Enis Söztutar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I was going to +1 the release, with the following checks I did:
> > > > - Checked md5 sums
> > > > - Checked gpg signature (gpg --verify )
> > > > - Checked included documentation book.html, etc.
> > > > - Running unit tests (passed on unsecure, secure)
> > > > - Started in local mode, run LoadTestTool
> > > > - integration tests (not working fully properly, but expected since
> > > > HBASE-7521 is not in yet)
> > > >
> > > > I guess this means that the release candidate has sunk, right?
> > > > Enis
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Good catch Jon.
> > > >>
> > > >> We need to be vigilant here all.
> > > >>
> > > >> Incompatibilities cost users and those following behind us as they
> > burn
> > > >> cycles doing gymnastics trying to get over the incompatibility -- if
> > it
> > > is
> > > >> possible to get over the incompatibility at all.  They make us look
> > bad.
> > > >> Worse, usually the incompatibility is found months later after we
> have
> > > all
> > > >> moved on and have long forgot what it was we committed (and even
> why)
> > so
> > > >> all the more reason to be on the look out at commit time.
> > > >>
> > > >> St.Ack
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Jonathan Hsieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Apache Hat: What a particular vendor chooses to puts in its
> releases
> > > >>> shouldn't affect an Apache release and especially if we are
> breaking
> > > >>> the
> > > >>> project's versioning / compatibility rules.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Jon.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > >>>> I downloaded hadoop-0.20.2+737 from Cloudera website.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> I found getShortUserName() in UserGroupInformation
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Haven't checked other 0.20.x source code yet.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> FYI
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Jonathan Hsieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> Hey guys, I saw HBASE-7814 [1] -- a backport committed to 0.94
> that
> > > >>>>> makes HBase 0.94 now require Hadoop 1.0 (instead of the older
> > > >>>>> hadoops).  This was supposed to be a new requirement for hbase
> > > 0.96.0.
> > > >>>>> [2]
> > > >>
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)