Eric Yang
2012-01-06, 00:55
Ariel Rabkin
2012-01-06, 07:08
Chris Douglas
2012-01-06, 07:20
Bill Graham
2012-01-06, 07:40
Ahmed Fathalla
2012-01-06, 16:15
Jerome Boulon
2012-01-06, 16:41
Eric Yang
2012-01-06, 19:10
Eric Yang
2012-01-06, 19:11
Eric Yang
2012-01-06, 19:12
Eric Yang
2012-01-09, 19:40
Ariel Rabkin
2012-01-09, 19:42
Eric Yang
2012-01-09, 20:07
Ariel Rabkin
2012-01-09, 20:15
William A. Rowe Jr.
2012-01-10, 05:50
Eric Yang
2012-01-10, 06:09
sebb
2012-01-10, 13:07
Eric Yang
2012-01-11, 20:33
Chris Douglas
2012-01-11, 20:55
Eric Yang
2012-01-14, 18:17
Eric Yang
2012-01-26, 05:49
William A. Rowe Jr.
2012-01-26, 06:04
Eric Yang
2012-01-26, 06:38
Ralph Goers
2012-01-26, 11:57
Chris Douglas
2012-01-26, 12:59
William A. Rowe Jr.
2012-01-26, 22:10
-
[VOTE] Chukwa 0.5.0 Release Candidate 1Eric Yang 2012-01-06, 00:55
Hi all,
IPMC had additional input about Chukwa license.txt and notice.txt.
The license files are updated, and restarting the voting process for
release candidate 1. With Chris's recommendation that we should
only submit source tarball for voting to reduce the work on license
issues on binary dependencies.
The source tarball is available at:
http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc1/
Documents are available at:
http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-docs/
Please download, evaluate, and vote on this list.
Thanks
regards,
Eric
IPMC had additional input about Chukwa license.txt and notice.txt.
The license files are updated, and restarting the voting process for
release candidate 1. With Chris's recommendation that we should
only submit source tarball for voting to reduce the work on license
issues on binary dependencies.
The source tarball is available at:
http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc1/
Documents are available at:
http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-docs/
Please download, evaluate, and vote on this list.
Thanks
regards,
Eric
-
Re: [VOTE] Chukwa 0.5.0 Release Candidate 1Ariel Rabkin 2012-01-06, 07:08
I like it.
+1
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Eric Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> IPMC had additional input about Chukwa license.txt and notice.txt.
> The license files are updated, and restarting the voting process for
> release candidate 1. With Chris's recommendation that we should
> only submit source tarball for voting to reduce the work on license
> issues on binary dependencies.
>
> The source tarball is available at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc1/
>
> Documents are available at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-docs/
>
> Please download, evaluate, and vote on this list.
> Thanks
>
> regards,
> Eric
--
Ari Rabkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
UC Berkeley Computer Science Department
+1
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Eric Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> IPMC had additional input about Chukwa license.txt and notice.txt.
> The license files are updated, and restarting the voting process for
> release candidate 1. With Chris's recommendation that we should
> only submit source tarball for voting to reduce the work on license
> issues on binary dependencies.
>
> The source tarball is available at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc1/
>
> Documents are available at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-docs/
>
> Please download, evaluate, and vote on this list.
> Thanks
>
> regards,
> Eric
--
Ari Rabkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
UC Berkeley Computer Science Department
-
Re: [VOTE] Chukwa 0.5.0 Release Candidate 1Chris Douglas 2012-01-06, 07:20
Signature matches; would you mind uploading an MD5, also?
The LICENSE and NOTICE changes look good to me. If that's the only
change from RC0, I think it's reasonable to start a [VOTE] thread
including both general@incubator and chukwa-dev@, and run them
concurrently.
The CDDL license in lib (jersey-bundle-LICENSE) is included in the
top-level LICENSE labeled as jsr311-api?
All the unit tests passed, also. Ran RAT as part of the verify target,
so that looks great.
+1 -C
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Eric Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> IPMC had additional input about Chukwa license.txt and notice.txt.
> The license files are updated, and restarting the voting process for
> release candidate 1. With Chris's recommendation that we should
> only submit source tarball for voting to reduce the work on license
> issues on binary dependencies.
>
> The source tarball is available at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc1/
>
> Documents are available at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-docs/
>
> Please download, evaluate, and vote on this list.
> Thanks
>
> regards,
> Eric
The LICENSE and NOTICE changes look good to me. If that's the only
change from RC0, I think it's reasonable to start a [VOTE] thread
including both general@incubator and chukwa-dev@, and run them
concurrently.
The CDDL license in lib (jersey-bundle-LICENSE) is included in the
top-level LICENSE labeled as jsr311-api?
All the unit tests passed, also. Ran RAT as part of the verify target,
so that looks great.
+1 -C
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Eric Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> IPMC had additional input about Chukwa license.txt and notice.txt.
> The license files are updated, and restarting the voting process for
> release candidate 1. With Chris's recommendation that we should
> only submit source tarball for voting to reduce the work on license
> issues on binary dependencies.
>
> The source tarball is available at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc1/
>
> Documents are available at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-docs/
>
> Please download, evaluate, and vote on this list.
> Thanks
>
> regards,
> Eric
-
Re: [VOTE] Chukwa 0.5.0 Release Candidate 1Bill Graham 2012-01-06, 07:40
+1
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Chris Douglas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Signature matches; would you mind uploading an MD5, also?
>
> The LICENSE and NOTICE changes look good to me. If that's the only
> change from RC0, I think it's reasonable to start a [VOTE] thread
> including both general@incubator and chukwa-dev@, and run them
> concurrently.
>
> The CDDL license in lib (jersey-bundle-LICENSE) is included in the
> top-level LICENSE labeled as jsr311-api?
>
> All the unit tests passed, also. Ran RAT as part of the verify target,
> so that looks great.
>
> +1 -C
>
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Eric Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > IPMC had additional input about Chukwa license.txt and notice.txt.
> > The license files are updated, and restarting the voting process for
> > release candidate 1. With Chris's recommendation that we should
> > only submit source tarball for voting to reduce the work on license
> > issues on binary dependencies.
> >
> > The source tarball is available at:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc1/
> >
> > Documents are available at:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-docs/
> >
> > Please download, evaluate, and vote on this list.
> > Thanks
> >
> > regards,
> > Eric
>
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Chris Douglas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Signature matches; would you mind uploading an MD5, also?
>
> The LICENSE and NOTICE changes look good to me. If that's the only
> change from RC0, I think it's reasonable to start a [VOTE] thread
> including both general@incubator and chukwa-dev@, and run them
> concurrently.
>
> The CDDL license in lib (jersey-bundle-LICENSE) is included in the
> top-level LICENSE labeled as jsr311-api?
>
> All the unit tests passed, also. Ran RAT as part of the verify target,
> so that looks great.
>
> +1 -C
>
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Eric Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > IPMC had additional input about Chukwa license.txt and notice.txt.
> > The license files are updated, and restarting the voting process for
> > release candidate 1. With Chris's recommendation that we should
> > only submit source tarball for voting to reduce the work on license
> > issues on binary dependencies.
> >
> > The source tarball is available at:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc1/
> >
> > Documents are available at:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-docs/
> >
> > Please download, evaluate, and vote on this list.
> > Thanks
> >
> > regards,
> > Eric
>
-
Re: [VOTE] Chukwa 0.5.0 Release Candidate 1Ahmed Fathalla 2012-01-06, 16:15
+1
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Bill Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Chris Douglas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Signature matches; would you mind uploading an MD5, also?
> >
> > The LICENSE and NOTICE changes look good to me. If that's the only
> > change from RC0, I think it's reasonable to start a [VOTE] thread
> > including both general@incubator and chukwa-dev@, and run them
> > concurrently.
> >
> > The CDDL license in lib (jersey-bundle-LICENSE) is included in the
> > top-level LICENSE labeled as jsr311-api?
> >
> > All the unit tests passed, also. Ran RAT as part of the verify target,
> > so that looks great.
> >
> > +1 -C
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Eric Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > IPMC had additional input about Chukwa license.txt and notice.txt.
> > > The license files are updated, and restarting the voting process for
> > > release candidate 1. With Chris's recommendation that we should
> > > only submit source tarball for voting to reduce the work on license
> > > issues on binary dependencies.
> > >
> > > The source tarball is available at:
> > >
> > > http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc1/
> > >
> > > Documents are available at:
> > >
> > > http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-docs/
> > >
> > > Please download, evaluate, and vote on this list.
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > regards,
> > > Eric
> >
>
--
Ahmed Fathalla
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Bill Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Chris Douglas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Signature matches; would you mind uploading an MD5, also?
> >
> > The LICENSE and NOTICE changes look good to me. If that's the only
> > change from RC0, I think it's reasonable to start a [VOTE] thread
> > including both general@incubator and chukwa-dev@, and run them
> > concurrently.
> >
> > The CDDL license in lib (jersey-bundle-LICENSE) is included in the
> > top-level LICENSE labeled as jsr311-api?
> >
> > All the unit tests passed, also. Ran RAT as part of the verify target,
> > so that looks great.
> >
> > +1 -C
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Eric Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > IPMC had additional input about Chukwa license.txt and notice.txt.
> > > The license files are updated, and restarting the voting process for
> > > release candidate 1. With Chris's recommendation that we should
> > > only submit source tarball for voting to reduce the work on license
> > > issues on binary dependencies.
> > >
> > > The source tarball is available at:
> > >
> > > http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc1/
> > >
> > > Documents are available at:
> > >
> > > http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-docs/
> > >
> > > Please download, evaluate, and vote on this list.
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > regards,
> > > Eric
> >
>
--
Ahmed Fathalla
-
Re: [VOTE] Chukwa 0.5.0 Release Candidate 1Jerome Boulon 2012-01-06, 16:41
+1
Looks good
/Jerome
On 1/6/12 8:15 AM, "Ahmed Fathalla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>+1
>
>On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Bill Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Chris Douglas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Signature matches; would you mind uploading an MD5, also?
>> >
>> > The LICENSE and NOTICE changes look good to me. If that's the only
>> > change from RC0, I think it's reasonable to start a [VOTE] thread
>> > including both general@incubator and chukwa-dev@, and run them
>> > concurrently.
>> >
>> > The CDDL license in lib (jersey-bundle-LICENSE) is included in the
>> > top-level LICENSE labeled as jsr311-api?
>> >
>> > All the unit tests passed, also. Ran RAT as part of the verify target,
>> > so that looks great.
>> >
>> > +1 -C
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Eric Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > Hi all,
>> > >
>> > > IPMC had additional input about Chukwa license.txt and notice.txt.
>> > > The license files are updated, and restarting the voting process for
>> > > release candidate 1. With Chris's recommendation that we should
>> > > only submit source tarball for voting to reduce the work on license
>> > > issues on binary dependencies.
>> > >
>> > > The source tarball is available at:
>> > >
>> > > http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc1/
>> > >
>> > > Documents are available at:
>> > >
>> > > http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-docs/
>> > >
>> > > Please download, evaluate, and vote on this list.
>> > > Thanks
>> > >
>> > > regards,
>> > > Eric
>> >
>>
>
>
>
>--
>Ahmed Fathalla
Looks good
/Jerome
On 1/6/12 8:15 AM, "Ahmed Fathalla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>+1
>
>On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Bill Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Chris Douglas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Signature matches; would you mind uploading an MD5, also?
>> >
>> > The LICENSE and NOTICE changes look good to me. If that's the only
>> > change from RC0, I think it's reasonable to start a [VOTE] thread
>> > including both general@incubator and chukwa-dev@, and run them
>> > concurrently.
>> >
>> > The CDDL license in lib (jersey-bundle-LICENSE) is included in the
>> > top-level LICENSE labeled as jsr311-api?
>> >
>> > All the unit tests passed, also. Ran RAT as part of the verify target,
>> > so that looks great.
>> >
>> > +1 -C
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Eric Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > Hi all,
>> > >
>> > > IPMC had additional input about Chukwa license.txt and notice.txt.
>> > > The license files are updated, and restarting the voting process for
>> > > release candidate 1. With Chris's recommendation that we should
>> > > only submit source tarball for voting to reduce the work on license
>> > > issues on binary dependencies.
>> > >
>> > > The source tarball is available at:
>> > >
>> > > http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc1/
>> > >
>> > > Documents are available at:
>> > >
>> > > http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-docs/
>> > >
>> > > Please download, evaluate, and vote on this list.
>> > > Thanks
>> > >
>> > > regards,
>> > > Eric
>> >
>>
>
>
>
>--
>Ahmed Fathalla
-
Re: [VOTE] Chukwa 0.5.0 Release Candidate 1Eric Yang 2012-01-06, 19:10
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Chris Douglas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Signature matches; would you mind uploading an MD5, also?
Yes, done. Thanks.
> The CDDL license in lib (jersey-bundle-LICENSE) is included in the
> top-level LICENSE labeled as jsr311-api?
Jersey, and jsr311 both have the same license CDDL v1.0. I use the
same text in top level LICENSE.
>
> All the unit tests passed, also. Ran RAT as part of the verify target,
> so that looks great.
>
> +1 -C
>
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Eric Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> IPMC had additional input about Chukwa license.txt and notice.txt.
>> The license files are updated, and restarting the voting process for
>> release candidate 1. With Chris's recommendation that we should
>> only submit source tarball for voting to reduce the work on license
>> issues on binary dependencies.
>>
>> The source tarball is available at:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc1/
>>
>> Documents are available at:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-docs/
>>
>> Please download, evaluate, and vote on this list.
>> Thanks
>>
>> regards,
>> Eric
> Signature matches; would you mind uploading an MD5, also?
Yes, done. Thanks.
> The CDDL license in lib (jersey-bundle-LICENSE) is included in the
> top-level LICENSE labeled as jsr311-api?
Jersey, and jsr311 both have the same license CDDL v1.0. I use the
same text in top level LICENSE.
>
> All the unit tests passed, also. Ran RAT as part of the verify target,
> so that looks great.
>
> +1 -C
>
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Eric Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> IPMC had additional input about Chukwa license.txt and notice.txt.
>> The license files are updated, and restarting the voting process for
>> release candidate 1. With Chris's recommendation that we should
>> only submit source tarball for voting to reduce the work on license
>> issues on binary dependencies.
>>
>> The source tarball is available at:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc1/
>>
>> Documents are available at:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-docs/
>>
>> Please download, evaluate, and vote on this list.
>> Thanks
>>
>> regards,
>> Eric
-
Re: [VOTE] Chukwa 0.5.0 Release Candidate 1Eric Yang 2012-01-06, 19:11
+1
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Jerome Boulon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
> Looks good
> /Jerome
>
> On 1/6/12 8:15 AM, "Ahmed Fathalla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>+1
>>
>>On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Bill Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Chris Douglas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Signature matches; would you mind uploading an MD5, also?
>>> >
>>> > The LICENSE and NOTICE changes look good to me. If that's the only
>>> > change from RC0, I think it's reasonable to start a [VOTE] thread
>>> > including both general@incubator and chukwa-dev@, and run them
>>> > concurrently.
>>> >
>>> > The CDDL license in lib (jersey-bundle-LICENSE) is included in the
>>> > top-level LICENSE labeled as jsr311-api?
>>> >
>>> > All the unit tests passed, also. Ran RAT as part of the verify target,
>>> > so that looks great.
>>> >
>>> > +1 -C
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Eric Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> > > Hi all,
>>> > >
>>> > > IPMC had additional input about Chukwa license.txt and notice.txt.
>>> > > The license files are updated, and restarting the voting process for
>>> > > release candidate 1. With Chris's recommendation that we should
>>> > > only submit source tarball for voting to reduce the work on license
>>> > > issues on binary dependencies.
>>> > >
>>> > > The source tarball is available at:
>>> > >
>>> > > http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc1/
>>> > >
>>> > > Documents are available at:
>>> > >
>>> > > http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-docs/
>>> > >
>>> > > Please download, evaluate, and vote on this list.
>>> > > Thanks
>>> > >
>>> > > regards,
>>> > > Eric
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>Ahmed Fathalla
>
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Jerome Boulon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
> Looks good
> /Jerome
>
> On 1/6/12 8:15 AM, "Ahmed Fathalla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>+1
>>
>>On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Bill Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Chris Douglas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Signature matches; would you mind uploading an MD5, also?
>>> >
>>> > The LICENSE and NOTICE changes look good to me. If that's the only
>>> > change from RC0, I think it's reasonable to start a [VOTE] thread
>>> > including both general@incubator and chukwa-dev@, and run them
>>> > concurrently.
>>> >
>>> > The CDDL license in lib (jersey-bundle-LICENSE) is included in the
>>> > top-level LICENSE labeled as jsr311-api?
>>> >
>>> > All the unit tests passed, also. Ran RAT as part of the verify target,
>>> > so that looks great.
>>> >
>>> > +1 -C
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Eric Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> > > Hi all,
>>> > >
>>> > > IPMC had additional input about Chukwa license.txt and notice.txt.
>>> > > The license files are updated, and restarting the voting process for
>>> > > release candidate 1. With Chris's recommendation that we should
>>> > > only submit source tarball for voting to reduce the work on license
>>> > > issues on binary dependencies.
>>> > >
>>> > > The source tarball is available at:
>>> > >
>>> > > http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc1/
>>> > >
>>> > > Documents are available at:
>>> > >
>>> > > http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-docs/
>>> > >
>>> > > Please download, evaluate, and vote on this list.
>>> > > Thanks
>>> > >
>>> > > regards,
>>> > > Eric
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>Ahmed Fathalla
>
-
Re: [VOTE] Chukwa 0.5.0 Release Candidate 1Eric Yang 2012-01-06, 19:12
Vote for PPMC has passed.
1 +1 Mentor vote, 4 +1 PPMC votes, and 1 +1 contributor votes
Thank you to everyone who voted. We will proceed to bring voting to
general@incubator for ipmc member to vote before we release.
regards,
Eric
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Eric Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Jerome Boulon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> +1
>> Looks good
>> /Jerome
>>
>> On 1/6/12 8:15 AM, "Ahmed Fathalla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>+1
>>>
>>>On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Bill Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Chris Douglas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Signature matches; would you mind uploading an MD5, also?
>>>> >
>>>> > The LICENSE and NOTICE changes look good to me. If that's the only
>>>> > change from RC0, I think it's reasonable to start a [VOTE] thread
>>>> > including both general@incubator and chukwa-dev@, and run them
>>>> > concurrently.
>>>> >
>>>> > The CDDL license in lib (jersey-bundle-LICENSE) is included in the
>>>> > top-level LICENSE labeled as jsr311-api?
>>>> >
>>>> > All the unit tests passed, also. Ran RAT as part of the verify target,
>>>> > so that looks great.
>>>> >
>>>> > +1 -C
>>>> >
>>>> > On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Eric Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> > > Hi all,
>>>> > >
>>>> > > IPMC had additional input about Chukwa license.txt and notice.txt.
>>>> > > The license files are updated, and restarting the voting process for
>>>> > > release candidate 1. With Chris's recommendation that we should
>>>> > > only submit source tarball for voting to reduce the work on license
>>>> > > issues on binary dependencies.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > The source tarball is available at:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc1/
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Documents are available at:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-docs/
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Please download, evaluate, and vote on this list.
>>>> > > Thanks
>>>> > >
>>>> > > regards,
>>>> > > Eric
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>Ahmed Fathalla
>>
1 +1 Mentor vote, 4 +1 PPMC votes, and 1 +1 contributor votes
Thank you to everyone who voted. We will proceed to bring voting to
general@incubator for ipmc member to vote before we release.
regards,
Eric
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Eric Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Jerome Boulon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> +1
>> Looks good
>> /Jerome
>>
>> On 1/6/12 8:15 AM, "Ahmed Fathalla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>+1
>>>
>>>On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Bill Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Chris Douglas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Signature matches; would you mind uploading an MD5, also?
>>>> >
>>>> > The LICENSE and NOTICE changes look good to me. If that's the only
>>>> > change from RC0, I think it's reasonable to start a [VOTE] thread
>>>> > including both general@incubator and chukwa-dev@, and run them
>>>> > concurrently.
>>>> >
>>>> > The CDDL license in lib (jersey-bundle-LICENSE) is included in the
>>>> > top-level LICENSE labeled as jsr311-api?
>>>> >
>>>> > All the unit tests passed, also. Ran RAT as part of the verify target,
>>>> > so that looks great.
>>>> >
>>>> > +1 -C
>>>> >
>>>> > On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Eric Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> > > Hi all,
>>>> > >
>>>> > > IPMC had additional input about Chukwa license.txt and notice.txt.
>>>> > > The license files are updated, and restarting the voting process for
>>>> > > release candidate 1. With Chris's recommendation that we should
>>>> > > only submit source tarball for voting to reduce the work on license
>>>> > > issues on binary dependencies.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > The source tarball is available at:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc1/
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Documents are available at:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-docs/
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Please download, evaluate, and vote on this list.
>>>> > > Thanks
>>>> > >
>>>> > > regards,
>>>> > > Eric
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>Ahmed Fathalla
>>
-
[VOTE] Chukwa 0.5.0 release candidate 2Eric Yang 2012-01-09, 19:40
Hi all,
Chukwa 0.5.0 is ready for release. This will be the first incubator
release for Chukwa.
The source tarball artifact is available at:
http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc2/
Documents are available at:
http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-docs/
The SVN tag to be voted upon:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/chukwa/tags/chukwa-0.5.0-rc2/
Chukwa's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc2/KEYS
Please download, evaluate, and vote on general@incubator.
The PPMC vote thread is in progress at the same time as general@incubator.
Changes since rc1:
- Updated LICENSE and NOTICE files to reflect changes base on ipmc feedback.
- Updated Hadoop dependency to Hadoop 1.0.0.
The vote will close at 12:30pm PST on Thursday January 12, 2012.
Thanks
regards,
Eric
Chukwa 0.5.0 is ready for release. This will be the first incubator
release for Chukwa.
The source tarball artifact is available at:
http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc2/
Documents are available at:
http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-docs/
The SVN tag to be voted upon:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/chukwa/tags/chukwa-0.5.0-rc2/
Chukwa's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc2/KEYS
Please download, evaluate, and vote on general@incubator.
The PPMC vote thread is in progress at the same time as general@incubator.
Changes since rc1:
- Updated LICENSE and NOTICE files to reflect changes base on ipmc feedback.
- Updated Hadoop dependency to Hadoop 1.0.0.
The vote will close at 12:30pm PST on Thursday January 12, 2012.
Thanks
regards,
Eric
-
Re: [VOTE] Chukwa 0.5.0 release candidate 2Ariel Rabkin 2012-01-09, 19:42
-1, should not have .patch files in the top-level dir.
--Ari
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Eric Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Chukwa 0.5.0 is ready for release. This will be the first incubator
> release for Chukwa.
>
> The source tarball artifact is available at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc2/
>
> Documents are available at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-docs/
>
> The SVN tag to be voted upon:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/chukwa/tags/chukwa-0.5.0-rc2/
>
> Chukwa's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc2/KEYS
>
> Please download, evaluate, and vote on general@incubator.
>
> The PPMC vote thread is in progress at the same time as general@incubator.
>
> Changes since rc1:
>
> - Updated LICENSE and NOTICE files to reflect changes base on ipmc feedback.
> - Updated Hadoop dependency to Hadoop 1.0.0.
>
> The vote will close at 12:30pm PST on Thursday January 12, 2012.
>
> Thanks
>
> regards,
> Eric
--
Ari Rabkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
UC Berkeley Computer Science Department
--Ari
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Eric Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Chukwa 0.5.0 is ready for release. This will be the first incubator
> release for Chukwa.
>
> The source tarball artifact is available at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc2/
>
> Documents are available at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-docs/
>
> The SVN tag to be voted upon:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/chukwa/tags/chukwa-0.5.0-rc2/
>
> Chukwa's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc2/KEYS
>
> Please download, evaluate, and vote on general@incubator.
>
> The PPMC vote thread is in progress at the same time as general@incubator.
>
> Changes since rc1:
>
> - Updated LICENSE and NOTICE files to reflect changes base on ipmc feedback.
> - Updated Hadoop dependency to Hadoop 1.0.0.
>
> The vote will close at 12:30pm PST on Thursday January 12, 2012.
>
> Thanks
>
> regards,
> Eric
--
Ari Rabkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
UC Berkeley Computer Science Department
-
Re: [VOTE] Chukwa 0.5.0 release candidate 2Eric Yang 2012-01-09, 20:07
My mistake. Since we are voting for the source svn tag and .patch
files are not in the
svn tree. I respin the source tarball for rc2. Thanks for the quick check.
regards,
Eric
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Ariel Rabkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -1, should not have .patch files in the top-level dir.
>
> --Ari
>
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Eric Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Chukwa 0.5.0 is ready for release. This will be the first incubator
>> release for Chukwa.
>>
>> The source tarball artifact is available at:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc2/
>>
>> Documents are available at:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-docs/
>>
>> The SVN tag to be voted upon:
>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/chukwa/tags/chukwa-0.5.0-rc2/
>>
>> Chukwa's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc2/KEYS
>>
>> Please download, evaluate, and vote on general@incubator.
>>
>> The PPMC vote thread is in progress at the same time as general@incubator.
>>
>> Changes since rc1:
>>
>> - Updated LICENSE and NOTICE files to reflect changes base on ipmc feedback.
>> - Updated Hadoop dependency to Hadoop 1.0.0.
>>
>> The vote will close at 12:30pm PST on Thursday January 12, 2012.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> regards,
>> Eric
>
>
>
> --
> Ari Rabkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> UC Berkeley Computer Science Department
files are not in the
svn tree. I respin the source tarball for rc2. Thanks for the quick check.
regards,
Eric
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Ariel Rabkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -1, should not have .patch files in the top-level dir.
>
> --Ari
>
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Eric Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Chukwa 0.5.0 is ready for release. This will be the first incubator
>> release for Chukwa.
>>
>> The source tarball artifact is available at:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc2/
>>
>> Documents are available at:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-docs/
>>
>> The SVN tag to be voted upon:
>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/chukwa/tags/chukwa-0.5.0-rc2/
>>
>> Chukwa's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc2/KEYS
>>
>> Please download, evaluate, and vote on general@incubator.
>>
>> The PPMC vote thread is in progress at the same time as general@incubator.
>>
>> Changes since rc1:
>>
>> - Updated LICENSE and NOTICE files to reflect changes base on ipmc feedback.
>> - Updated Hadoop dependency to Hadoop 1.0.0.
>>
>> The vote will close at 12:30pm PST on Thursday January 12, 2012.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> regards,
>> Eric
>
>
>
> --
> Ari Rabkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> UC Berkeley Computer Science Department
-
Re: [VOTE] Chukwa 0.5.0 release candidate 2Ariel Rabkin 2012-01-09, 20:15
OK. Then +1
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Eric Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My mistake. Since we are voting for the source svn tag and .patch
> files are not in the
> svn tree. I respin the source tarball for rc2. Thanks for the quick check.
>
> regards,
> Eric
>
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Ariel Rabkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> -1, should not have .patch files in the top-level dir.
>>
>> --Ari
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Eric Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Chukwa 0.5.0 is ready for release. This will be the first incubator
>>> release for Chukwa.
>>>
>>> The source tarball artifact is available at:
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc2/
>>>
>>> Documents are available at:
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-docs/
>>>
>>> The SVN tag to be voted upon:
>>>
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/chukwa/tags/chukwa-0.5.0-rc2/
>>>
>>> Chukwa's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc2/KEYS
>>>
>>> Please download, evaluate, and vote on general@incubator.
>>>
>>> The PPMC vote thread is in progress at the same time as general@incubator.
>>>
>>> Changes since rc1:
>>>
>>> - Updated LICENSE and NOTICE files to reflect changes base on ipmc feedback.
>>> - Updated Hadoop dependency to Hadoop 1.0.0.
>>>
>>> The vote will close at 12:30pm PST on Thursday January 12, 2012.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> regards,
>>> Eric
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ari Rabkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> UC Berkeley Computer Science Department
--
Ari Rabkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
UC Berkeley Computer Science Department
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Eric Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My mistake. Since we are voting for the source svn tag and .patch
> files are not in the
> svn tree. I respin the source tarball for rc2. Thanks for the quick check.
>
> regards,
> Eric
>
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Ariel Rabkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> -1, should not have .patch files in the top-level dir.
>>
>> --Ari
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Eric Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Chukwa 0.5.0 is ready for release. This will be the first incubator
>>> release for Chukwa.
>>>
>>> The source tarball artifact is available at:
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc2/
>>>
>>> Documents are available at:
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-docs/
>>>
>>> The SVN tag to be voted upon:
>>>
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/chukwa/tags/chukwa-0.5.0-rc2/
>>>
>>> Chukwa's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc2/KEYS
>>>
>>> Please download, evaluate, and vote on general@incubator.
>>>
>>> The PPMC vote thread is in progress at the same time as general@incubator.
>>>
>>> Changes since rc1:
>>>
>>> - Updated LICENSE and NOTICE files to reflect changes base on ipmc feedback.
>>> - Updated Hadoop dependency to Hadoop 1.0.0.
>>>
>>> The vote will close at 12:30pm PST on Thursday January 12, 2012.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> regards,
>>> Eric
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ari Rabkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> UC Berkeley Computer Science Department
--
Ari Rabkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
UC Berkeley Computer Science Department
-
Re: [VOTE] Chukwa 0.5.0 release candidate 2William A. Rowe Jr. 2012-01-10, 05:50
On 1/9/2012 2:07 PM, Eric Yang wrote:
> My mistake. Since we are voting for the source svn tag and .patch
> files are not in the
> svn tree. I respin the source tarball for rc2. Thanks for the quick check.
Let me make sure we are saying the same thing.
We vote on -tarballs-.
If the tag didn't change, yes, reroll the same tag :)
> My mistake. Since we are voting for the source svn tag and .patch
> files are not in the
> svn tree. I respin the source tarball for rc2. Thanks for the quick check.
Let me make sure we are saying the same thing.
We vote on -tarballs-.
If the tag didn't change, yes, reroll the same tag :)
-
[VOTE] Chukwa 0.5.0 Release Candidate 3Eric Yang 2012-01-10, 06:09
Hi all,
Chukwa 0.5.0 is ready for release. This will be the first incubator
release for Chukwa.
The source tarball artifact is available at:
http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc3/
Documents are available at:
http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-docs/
The SVN tag to be voted upon:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/chukwa/tags/chukwa-0.5.0-rc3/
Chukwa's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc3/KEYS
Please download, evaluate, and vote on general@incubator.
The PPMC vote thread is in progress at the same time as general@incubator.
Changes since rc2:
- Updated LICENSE and NOTICE files to reflect changes base on Sebb's examples.
The vote will close at 12:30pm PST on Saturday January 14, 2012.
Thanks
regards,
Eric
Chukwa 0.5.0 is ready for release. This will be the first incubator
release for Chukwa.
The source tarball artifact is available at:
http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc3/
Documents are available at:
http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-docs/
The SVN tag to be voted upon:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/chukwa/tags/chukwa-0.5.0-rc3/
Chukwa's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc3/KEYS
Please download, evaluate, and vote on general@incubator.
The PPMC vote thread is in progress at the same time as general@incubator.
Changes since rc2:
- Updated LICENSE and NOTICE files to reflect changes base on Sebb's examples.
The vote will close at 12:30pm PST on Saturday January 14, 2012.
Thanks
regards,
Eric
-
Re: [VOTE] Chukwa 0.5.0 Release Candidate 3sebb 2012-01-10, 13:07
On 10 January 2012 06:09, Eric Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Chukwa 0.5.0 is ready for release. This will be the first incubator
> release for Chukwa.
>
> The source tarball artifact is available at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc3/
>
> Documents are available at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-docs/
>
> The SVN tag to be voted upon:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/chukwa/tags/chukwa-0.5.0-rc3/
N&L files look OK to me now; thanks for fixing them.
> Chukwa's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc3/KEYS
>
> Please download, evaluate, and vote on general@incubator.
>
> The PPMC vote thread is in progress at the same time as general@incubator.
>
> Changes since rc2:
>
> - Updated LICENSE and NOTICE files to reflect changes base on Sebb's examples.
>
> The vote will close at 12:30pm PST on Saturday January 14, 2012.
>
> Thanks
>
> regards,
> Eric
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Hi all,
>
> Chukwa 0.5.0 is ready for release. This will be the first incubator
> release for Chukwa.
>
> The source tarball artifact is available at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc3/
>
> Documents are available at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-docs/
>
> The SVN tag to be voted upon:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/chukwa/tags/chukwa-0.5.0-rc3/
N&L files look OK to me now; thanks for fixing them.
> Chukwa's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc3/KEYS
>
> Please download, evaluate, and vote on general@incubator.
>
> The PPMC vote thread is in progress at the same time as general@incubator.
>
> Changes since rc2:
>
> - Updated LICENSE and NOTICE files to reflect changes base on Sebb's examples.
>
> The vote will close at 12:30pm PST on Saturday January 14, 2012.
>
> Thanks
>
> regards,
> Eric
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
-
Re: [VOTE] Chukwa 0.5.0 Release Candidate 3Eric Yang 2012-01-11, 20:33
+1
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 5:07 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10 January 2012 06:09, Eric Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Chukwa 0.5.0 is ready for release. This will be the first incubator
>> release for Chukwa.
>>
>> The source tarball artifact is available at:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc3/
>>
>> Documents are available at:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-docs/
>>
>> The SVN tag to be voted upon:
>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/chukwa/tags/chukwa-0.5.0-rc3/
>
> N&L files look OK to me now; thanks for fixing them.
>
>> Chukwa's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc3/KEYS
>>
>> Please download, evaluate, and vote on general@incubator.
>>
>> The PPMC vote thread is in progress at the same time as general@incubator.
>>
>> Changes since rc2:
>>
>> - Updated LICENSE and NOTICE files to reflect changes base on Sebb's examples.
>>
>> The vote will close at 12:30pm PST on Saturday January 14, 2012.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> regards,
>> Eric
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 5:07 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10 January 2012 06:09, Eric Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Chukwa 0.5.0 is ready for release. This will be the first incubator
>> release for Chukwa.
>>
>> The source tarball artifact is available at:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc3/
>>
>> Documents are available at:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-docs/
>>
>> The SVN tag to be voted upon:
>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/chukwa/tags/chukwa-0.5.0-rc3/
>
> N&L files look OK to me now; thanks for fixing them.
>
>> Chukwa's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc3/KEYS
>>
>> Please download, evaluate, and vote on general@incubator.
>>
>> The PPMC vote thread is in progress at the same time as general@incubator.
>>
>> Changes since rc2:
>>
>> - Updated LICENSE and NOTICE files to reflect changes base on Sebb's examples.
>>
>> The vote will close at 12:30pm PST on Saturday January 14, 2012.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> regards,
>> Eric
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
-
Re: [VOTE] Chukwa 0.5.0 Release Candidate 3Chris Douglas 2012-01-11, 20:55
+1 (binding)
Checksum and signature match, verifications from previous RCs hold b/c
only NOTICE and LICENSE have changed. -C
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Eric Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Chukwa 0.5.0 is ready for release. This will be the first incubator
> release for Chukwa.
>
> The source tarball artifact is available at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc3/
>
> Documents are available at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-docs/
>
> The SVN tag to be voted upon:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/chukwa/tags/chukwa-0.5.0-rc3/
>
> Chukwa's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc3/KEYS
>
> Please download, evaluate, and vote on general@incubator.
>
> The PPMC vote thread is in progress at the same time as general@incubator.
>
> Changes since rc2:
>
> - Updated LICENSE and NOTICE files to reflect changes base on Sebb's examples.
>
> The vote will close at 12:30pm PST on Saturday January 14, 2012.
>
> Thanks
>
> regards,
> Eric
Checksum and signature match, verifications from previous RCs hold b/c
only NOTICE and LICENSE have changed. -C
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Eric Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Chukwa 0.5.0 is ready for release. This will be the first incubator
> release for Chukwa.
>
> The source tarball artifact is available at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc3/
>
> Documents are available at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-docs/
>
> The SVN tag to be voted upon:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/chukwa/tags/chukwa-0.5.0-rc3/
>
> Chukwa's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc3/KEYS
>
> Please download, evaluate, and vote on general@incubator.
>
> The PPMC vote thread is in progress at the same time as general@incubator.
>
> Changes since rc2:
>
> - Updated LICENSE and NOTICE files to reflect changes base on Sebb's examples.
>
> The vote will close at 12:30pm PST on Saturday January 14, 2012.
>
> Thanks
>
> regards,
> Eric
-
Re: [VOTE] Chukwa 0.5.0 Release Candidate 3Eric Yang 2012-01-14, 18:17
This is a reminder to vote Chukwa 0.5.0 release candidate 3. We are
still missing 2 IPMC votes to close this vote. If someone could take
a look, it would be greatly appreciated.
regards,
Eric
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Chris Douglas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Checksum and signature match, verifications from previous RCs hold b/c
> only NOTICE and LICENSE have changed. -C
>
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Eric Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Chukwa 0.5.0 is ready for release. This will be the first incubator
>> release for Chukwa.
>>
>> The source tarball artifact is available at:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc3/
>>
>> Documents are available at:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-docs/
>>
>> The SVN tag to be voted upon:
>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/chukwa/tags/chukwa-0.5.0-rc3/
>>
>> Chukwa's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc3/KEYS
>>
>> Please download, evaluate, and vote on general@incubator.
>>
>> The PPMC vote thread is in progress at the same time as general@incubator.
>>
>> Changes since rc2:
>>
>> - Updated LICENSE and NOTICE files to reflect changes base on Sebb's examples.
>>
>> The vote will close at 12:30pm PST on Saturday January 14, 2012.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> regards,
>> Eric
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
still missing 2 IPMC votes to close this vote. If someone could take
a look, it would be greatly appreciated.
regards,
Eric
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Chris Douglas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Checksum and signature match, verifications from previous RCs hold b/c
> only NOTICE and LICENSE have changed. -C
>
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Eric Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Chukwa 0.5.0 is ready for release. This will be the first incubator
>> release for Chukwa.
>>
>> The source tarball artifact is available at:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc3/
>>
>> Documents are available at:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-docs/
>>
>> The SVN tag to be voted upon:
>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/chukwa/tags/chukwa-0.5.0-rc3/
>>
>> Chukwa's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc3/KEYS
>>
>> Please download, evaluate, and vote on general@incubator.
>>
>> The PPMC vote thread is in progress at the same time as general@incubator.
>>
>> Changes since rc2:
>>
>> - Updated LICENSE and NOTICE files to reflect changes base on Sebb's examples.
>>
>> The vote will close at 12:30pm PST on Saturday January 14, 2012.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> regards,
>> Eric
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
-
Re: [VOTE] Chukwa 0.5.0 Release Candidate 3Eric Yang 2012-01-26, 05:49
The voting period is now closed. Thanks to everyone who took the time
to review the release.
Result Summary for this List:
+1 [1]
0 [1]
-1 [0]
With the one IPMC member vote from mentors on the dev list and two +1
from general@incubator, the vote succeeds.
IPMC member voting record:
Chris Douglas: +1
Ralph Goers: +1
Ant Elder: +1
regards,
Eric
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 12:55 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
>
> Same comment on the NOTICE file as over here:
> http://apache.markmail.org/message/hlfebouyg3r5w27i
>
> ...ant
>
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 6:46 AM, Eric Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Still missing one IPMC vote. Could someone help out?
>>
>> regards,
>> Eric
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 12:06 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On 1/15/2012 1:42 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>>>> You know, you have 4 mentors all of whom are supposed to be IPMC members. Have they voted?
>>>
>>> Nope, traveling, and now back in project hell at one of my own
>>> homes. I did review the Chukwa monthly report and comment on
>>> several apparent issues on dev@. I don't expect to have time
>>> to review this specific candidate, owing to a backlog of work
>>> accumulated over this short vacation.
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
to review the release.
Result Summary for this List:
+1 [1]
0 [1]
-1 [0]
With the one IPMC member vote from mentors on the dev list and two +1
from general@incubator, the vote succeeds.
IPMC member voting record:
Chris Douglas: +1
Ralph Goers: +1
Ant Elder: +1
regards,
Eric
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 12:55 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
>
> Same comment on the NOTICE file as over here:
> http://apache.markmail.org/message/hlfebouyg3r5w27i
>
> ...ant
>
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 6:46 AM, Eric Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Still missing one IPMC vote. Could someone help out?
>>
>> regards,
>> Eric
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 12:06 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On 1/15/2012 1:42 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>>>> You know, you have 4 mentors all of whom are supposed to be IPMC members. Have they voted?
>>>
>>> Nope, traveling, and now back in project hell at one of my own
>>> homes. I did review the Chukwa monthly report and comment on
>>> several apparent issues on dev@. I don't expect to have time
>>> to review this specific candidate, owing to a backlog of work
>>> accumulated over this short vacation.
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
-
Re: [VOTE] Chukwa 0.5.0 Release Candidate 3William A. Rowe Jr. 2012-01-26, 06:04
On 1/25/2012 11:49 PM, Eric Yang wrote:
> The voting period is now closed. Thanks to everyone who took the time
> to review the release.
>
> Result Summary for this List:
>
> +1 [1]
> 0 [1]
> -1 [0]
>
> With the one IPMC member vote from mentors on the dev list and two +1
> from general@incubator, the vote succeeds.
>
> IPMC member voting record:
> Chris Douglas: +1
> Ralph Goers: +1
> Ant Elder: +1
I am very confused by your tally above. you cite [1] in brackets and
there are three votes +1 between PPMC and IPMC.
I'm very worried that, sans mentors, this PPMC can't muster three votes
for a candidate. I think it might be premature to release and is a very
long way from graduation.
Please don't summarize simply IPMC binding votes, but cover all categories,
most especially chukwa-dev community votes. Repost with the correct totals,
because we [Incubator PMC] need that to gauge the health of the project.
> The voting period is now closed. Thanks to everyone who took the time
> to review the release.
>
> Result Summary for this List:
>
> +1 [1]
> 0 [1]
> -1 [0]
>
> With the one IPMC member vote from mentors on the dev list and two +1
> from general@incubator, the vote succeeds.
>
> IPMC member voting record:
> Chris Douglas: +1
> Ralph Goers: +1
> Ant Elder: +1
I am very confused by your tally above. you cite [1] in brackets and
there are three votes +1 between PPMC and IPMC.
I'm very worried that, sans mentors, this PPMC can't muster three votes
for a candidate. I think it might be premature to release and is a very
long way from graduation.
Please don't summarize simply IPMC binding votes, but cover all categories,
most especially chukwa-dev community votes. Repost with the correct totals,
because we [Incubator PMC] need that to gauge the health of the project.
-
Re: [VOTE] Chukwa 0.5.0 Release Candidate 3Eric Yang 2012-01-26, 06:38
My apology to all. I am sorry to send out the draft copy when I
intented to save as draft to count the actual votes.
Result Summary for voting Chukwa 0.5.0 RC 3
+1 [9]
0 [0]
-1 [0]
IPMC:
+1 Chris Douglas
+1 Ralph Goers
+1 Ant Elder
PPMC:
+1 Bill Graham
+1 Jerome Boulon
+1 Ari Rabkin
+1 Eric Yang
Committer:
+1 Ahmed Fathalla
Contributor
+1 Mohammad Tariq
The vote is now closed. Thanks to everyone who took the time to
review the release.
regards,
Eric
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:04 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/25/2012 11:49 PM, Eric Yang wrote:
>> The voting period is now closed. Thanks to everyone who took the time
>> to review the release.
>>
>> Result Summary for this List:
>>
>> +1 [1]
>> 0 [1]
>> -1 [0]
>>
>> With the one IPMC member vote from mentors on the dev list and two +1
>> from general@incubator, the vote succeeds.
>>
>> IPMC member voting record:
>> Chris Douglas: +1
>> Ralph Goers: +1
>> Ant Elder: +1
>
> I am very confused by your tally above. you cite [1] in brackets and
> there are three votes +1 between PPMC and IPMC.
>
> I'm very worried that, sans mentors, this PPMC can't muster three votes
> for a candidate. I think it might be premature to release and is a very
> long way from graduation.
>
> Please don't summarize simply IPMC binding votes, but cover all categories,
> most especially chukwa-dev community votes. Repost with the correct totals,
> because we [Incubator PMC] need that to gauge the health of the project.
intented to save as draft to count the actual votes.
Result Summary for voting Chukwa 0.5.0 RC 3
+1 [9]
0 [0]
-1 [0]
IPMC:
+1 Chris Douglas
+1 Ralph Goers
+1 Ant Elder
PPMC:
+1 Bill Graham
+1 Jerome Boulon
+1 Ari Rabkin
+1 Eric Yang
Committer:
+1 Ahmed Fathalla
Contributor
+1 Mohammad Tariq
The vote is now closed. Thanks to everyone who took the time to
review the release.
regards,
Eric
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:04 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/25/2012 11:49 PM, Eric Yang wrote:
>> The voting period is now closed. Thanks to everyone who took the time
>> to review the release.
>>
>> Result Summary for this List:
>>
>> +1 [1]
>> 0 [1]
>> -1 [0]
>>
>> With the one IPMC member vote from mentors on the dev list and two +1
>> from general@incubator, the vote succeeds.
>>
>> IPMC member voting record:
>> Chris Douglas: +1
>> Ralph Goers: +1
>> Ant Elder: +1
>
> I am very confused by your tally above. you cite [1] in brackets and
> there are three votes +1 between PPMC and IPMC.
>
> I'm very worried that, sans mentors, this PPMC can't muster three votes
> for a candidate. I think it might be premature to release and is a very
> long way from graduation.
>
> Please don't summarize simply IPMC binding votes, but cover all categories,
> most especially chukwa-dev community votes. Repost with the correct totals,
> because we [Incubator PMC] need that to gauge the health of the project.
-
Re: [VOTE] Chukwa 0.5.0 Release Candidate 3Ralph Goers 2012-01-26, 11:57
Now you have me worried. This podling has 4 mentors listed. Only 1 voted on the release. You indicated you were too busy to look at it and the other two didn't participate at all. Although the tally below is obviously incorrect and needed to be corrected, your response leads me to believe you weren't monitoring the voting on chuckwa-dev. My worry isn't about the PPMC or committers but about whether this podling has sufficient mentors. Is everything being left to Chris?
Mind you, I don't follow chuckwa-dev so perhaps my perception is incorrect, but a podling should normally be able to get 3 IPMC votes just from its mentors.
Ralph
Sent from my iPad
On Jan 26, 2012, at 1:04 AM, "William A. Rowe Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/25/2012 11:49 PM, Eric Yang wrote:
>> The voting period is now closed. Thanks to everyone who took the time
>> to review the release.
>>
>> Result Summary for this List:
>>
>> +1 [1]
>> 0 [1]
>> -1 [0]
>>
>> With the one IPMC member vote from mentors on the dev list and two +1
>> from general@incubator, the vote succeeds.
>>
>> IPMC member voting record:
>> Chris Douglas: +1
>> Ralph Goers: +1
>> Ant Elder: +1
>
> I am very confused by your tally above. you cite [1] in brackets and
> there are three votes +1 between PPMC and IPMC.
>
> I'm very worried that, sans mentors, this PPMC can't muster three votes
> for a candidate. I think it might be premature to release and is a very
> long way from graduation.
>
> Please don't summarize simply IPMC binding votes, but cover all categories,
> most especially chukwa-dev community votes. Repost with the correct totals,
> because we [Incubator PMC] need that to gauge the health of the project.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Mind you, I don't follow chuckwa-dev so perhaps my perception is incorrect, but a podling should normally be able to get 3 IPMC votes just from its mentors.
Ralph
Sent from my iPad
On Jan 26, 2012, at 1:04 AM, "William A. Rowe Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/25/2012 11:49 PM, Eric Yang wrote:
>> The voting period is now closed. Thanks to everyone who took the time
>> to review the release.
>>
>> Result Summary for this List:
>>
>> +1 [1]
>> 0 [1]
>> -1 [0]
>>
>> With the one IPMC member vote from mentors on the dev list and two +1
>> from general@incubator, the vote succeeds.
>>
>> IPMC member voting record:
>> Chris Douglas: +1
>> Ralph Goers: +1
>> Ant Elder: +1
>
> I am very confused by your tally above. you cite [1] in brackets and
> there are three votes +1 between PPMC and IPMC.
>
> I'm very worried that, sans mentors, this PPMC can't muster three votes
> for a candidate. I think it might be premature to release and is a very
> long way from graduation.
>
> Please don't summarize simply IPMC binding votes, but cover all categories,
> most especially chukwa-dev community votes. Repost with the correct totals,
> because we [Incubator PMC] need that to gauge the health of the project.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
-
Re: [VOTE] Chukwa 0.5.0 Release Candidate 3Chris Douglas 2012-01-26, 12:59
One of the mentors recently resigned: http://s.apache.org/2Ss
Chukwa has been coming out of a long, quasi-dormancy due to a
complicated set of upstream dependencies that weren't releasing the
features it required. It's discussed in the December report:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/December2011
Now that it's unblocked, there will be more to monitor, we hope. I
think the other mentors' absence is a hiccup, though I'll ping Bernd.
If there's another IPMC member with spare cycles, it'd be helpful to
have another mentor to replace Owen. -C
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 3:57 AM, Ralph Goers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now you have me worried. This podling has 4 mentors listed. Only 1 voted on the release. You indicated you were too busy to look at it and the other two didn't participate at all. Although the tally below is obviously incorrect and needed to be corrected, your response leads me to believe you weren't monitoring the voting on chuckwa-dev. My worry isn't about the PPMC or committers but about whether this podling has sufficient mentors. Is everything being left to Chris?
>
> Mind you, I don't follow chuckwa-dev so perhaps my perception is incorrect, but a podling should normally be able to get 3 IPMC votes just from its mentors.
>
> Ralph
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Jan 26, 2012, at 1:04 AM, "William A. Rowe Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On 1/25/2012 11:49 PM, Eric Yang wrote:
>>> The voting period is now closed. Thanks to everyone who took the time
>>> to review the release.
>>>
>>> Result Summary for this List:
>>>
>>> +1 [1]
>>> 0 [1]
>>> -1 [0]
>>>
>>> With the one IPMC member vote from mentors on the dev list and two +1
>>> from general@incubator, the vote succeeds.
>>>
>>> IPMC member voting record:
>>> Chris Douglas: +1
>>> Ralph Goers: +1
>>> Ant Elder: +1
>>
>> I am very confused by your tally above. you cite [1] in brackets and
>> there are three votes +1 between PPMC and IPMC.
>>
>> I'm very worried that, sans mentors, this PPMC can't muster three votes
>> for a candidate. I think it might be premature to release and is a very
>> long way from graduation.
>>
>> Please don't summarize simply IPMC binding votes, but cover all categories,
>> most especially chukwa-dev community votes. Repost with the correct totals,
>> because we [Incubator PMC] need that to gauge the health of the project.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Chukwa has been coming out of a long, quasi-dormancy due to a
complicated set of upstream dependencies that weren't releasing the
features it required. It's discussed in the December report:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/December2011
Now that it's unblocked, there will be more to monitor, we hope. I
think the other mentors' absence is a hiccup, though I'll ping Bernd.
If there's another IPMC member with spare cycles, it'd be helpful to
have another mentor to replace Owen. -C
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 3:57 AM, Ralph Goers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now you have me worried. This podling has 4 mentors listed. Only 1 voted on the release. You indicated you were too busy to look at it and the other two didn't participate at all. Although the tally below is obviously incorrect and needed to be corrected, your response leads me to believe you weren't monitoring the voting on chuckwa-dev. My worry isn't about the PPMC or committers but about whether this podling has sufficient mentors. Is everything being left to Chris?
>
> Mind you, I don't follow chuckwa-dev so perhaps my perception is incorrect, but a podling should normally be able to get 3 IPMC votes just from its mentors.
>
> Ralph
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Jan 26, 2012, at 1:04 AM, "William A. Rowe Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On 1/25/2012 11:49 PM, Eric Yang wrote:
>>> The voting period is now closed. Thanks to everyone who took the time
>>> to review the release.
>>>
>>> Result Summary for this List:
>>>
>>> +1 [1]
>>> 0 [1]
>>> -1 [0]
>>>
>>> With the one IPMC member vote from mentors on the dev list and two +1
>>> from general@incubator, the vote succeeds.
>>>
>>> IPMC member voting record:
>>> Chris Douglas: +1
>>> Ralph Goers: +1
>>> Ant Elder: +1
>>
>> I am very confused by your tally above. you cite [1] in brackets and
>> there are three votes +1 between PPMC and IPMC.
>>
>> I'm very worried that, sans mentors, this PPMC can't muster three votes
>> for a candidate. I think it might be premature to release and is a very
>> long way from graduation.
>>
>> Please don't summarize simply IPMC binding votes, but cover all categories,
>> most especially chukwa-dev community votes. Repost with the correct totals,
>> because we [Incubator PMC] need that to gauge the health of the project.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
-
Re: [VOTE] Chukwa 0.5.0 Release Candidate 3William A. Rowe Jr. 2012-01-26, 22:10
On 1/26/2012 5:57 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> Now you have me worried. This podling has 4 mentors listed. Only 1 voted on the release. You indicated you were too busy to look at it and the other two didn't participate at all. Although the tally below is obviously incorrect and needed to be corrected, your response leads me to believe you weren't monitoring the voting on chuckwa-dev. My worry isn't about the PPMC or committers but about whether this podling has sufficient mentors. Is everything being left to Chris?
Now, three, so yes it would be good to bring on another if someone has
some free cycles. But there isn't much to be worried about here, I had
simply corrected Eric's post, and for the benefit of everyone on general@,
pointed out what the IPMC is sensitive to so that future release tallies
from any podling will be more informative.
> Mind you, I don't follow chuckwa-dev so perhaps my perception is incorrect, but a podling should normally be able to get 3 IPMC votes just from its mentors.
We disagree; that entirely depends on the mentor's personal schedules.
> Now you have me worried. This podling has 4 mentors listed. Only 1 voted on the release. You indicated you were too busy to look at it and the other two didn't participate at all. Although the tally below is obviously incorrect and needed to be corrected, your response leads me to believe you weren't monitoring the voting on chuckwa-dev. My worry isn't about the PPMC or committers but about whether this podling has sufficient mentors. Is everything being left to Chris?
Now, three, so yes it would be good to bring on another if someone has
some free cycles. But there isn't much to be worried about here, I had
simply corrected Eric's post, and for the benefit of everyone on general@,
pointed out what the IPMC is sensitive to so that future release tallies
from any podling will be more informative.
> Mind you, I don't follow chuckwa-dev so perhaps my perception is incorrect, but a podling should normally be able to get 3 IPMC votes just from its mentors.
We disagree; that entirely depends on the mentor's personal schedules.
