John Lilley 2013-10-20, 15:24
Harsh J 2013-10-20, 16:48
John Lilley 2013-10-20, 20:35
John Lilley 2013-10-21, 22:52
John Lilley 2013-10-21, 15:19
Harsh J 2013-10-21, 18:11
-RE: temporary file locations for YARN applications
John Lilley 2013-10-21, 22:49
Thanks, sounds like LOCAL_DIR_ENV is the way to go.
From: Harsh J [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 12:11 PM
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: temporary file locations for YARN applications
The dirs in that env-var are app-specific and are for the app's user to utilize. You shouldn't have any permission issues working within them.
The LocalDirAllocator is still somewhat MR-bound but you can still be able to make it work by giving it a config with the values it needs.
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 8:49 PM, John Lilley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks again. This gives me a lot of options; we will see what works.
> Do you know if there are any permissions issues if we directly access the folders of LOCAL_DIR_ENV?
> Regarding LocalDirAllocator, I see its constructor: LocalDirAllocator(String contextCfgItemName) and a note mentioning that an example of this item is "mapred.local.dir". Is that the correct usage, or is there something YARN-generic?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Harsh J [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, October 20, 2013 11:58 PM
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: temporary file locations for YARN applications
> MR does use multiple disks when spilling. But the work directory is also round-robined to spread I/O.
> YARN sets an environment property thats a list (comma separated value)
> of directories (ApplicationConstants.LOCAL_DIR_ENV) your app container
> can together use. Perhaps read it in with
> _DIR_ENV)); and then round robin internally over those paths (with
> free space handling)?
> Perhaps you can even reuse the org.apache.hadoop.fs.LocalDirAllocator
> class; which is what MR uses. Its not been declared publicly stable though, but we can do that over a JIRA.
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 2:05 AM, John Lilley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Harsh, thanks for the quick response. These files don't need to be on the DFS (although we use that too). These are local files used during sorting, joining, transitive closure.
>> The task-relative folder might be good enough, but our app *can* make use of multiple temp folders if they are available. Our YARN app can be fairly I/O intensive; is it possible to allocate more than one temp folder on different physical devices?
>> Or perhaps YARN might help us. Will YARN assign tasks to CWD folders on different disks so that they do not compete with each other on I/O?
>> For that matter, where does MR allocate the temporary files generated by Mapper output? Presumably MR has the same I/O parallelism requirements that we do.
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Harsh J [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Sunday, October 20, 2013 10:49 AM
>> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subject: Re: temporary file locations for YARN applications
>> Every container gets its own local work directory (You can use the relative ./) thats auto-cleaned up at the end of the container's life.
>> This is the best place to store the temporary files. This is not something you need custom configuration for.
>> Do the files need to be on a distributed FS or a local one?
>> On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 8:54 PM, John Lilley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> We have a pure YARN application (no MapReduce) that has need to
>>> store a significant amount of temporary data. How can we know the
>>> best location for these files? How can we ensure that our YARN
>>> tasks have write access to these locations? Is this something that must be configured outside of YARN?
>> Harsh J
> Harsh J
John Lilley 2014-01-14, 21:30