Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
HBase >> mail # dev >> Does compatibility between versions also mean binary compatibility?


Copy link to this message
-
Re: Does compatibility between versions also mean binary compatibility?
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Enis Söztutar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> For normal client-level API's, I am not convinced that we should keep
> binary compatibility between major versions. It will tie our hands of doing
> some changes between major versions.
>

I agree with this.  Once we go 1.0 I'd be more inclined to agree with
restricting breaking changes like this.  However I think as long as we're
wire compatible that gets most of what our users really want, while
allowing flexibility in developing new versions.
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB