-Re: Set scanner caching to a better default?
Andrew Purtell 2012-10-17, 03:48
I set that to 100 typically.
On Tuesday, October 16, 2012, lars hofhansl wrote:
> We just ran into this again today, where we forgot to set scanner caching
> and observed bad performance.
> The default of 1 does not seem to make any sense (except for very specific
> case of large/wide rows).
> Any value between 10 and 1000 should be OK, really. Maybe the default
> should be 100.
> This would also go some way to avoid the perception that HBase is slow for
> folks who are just playing around with it.
> -- Lars
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)