Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Accumulo >> mail # user >> benchmarks


Copy link to this message
-
Re: benchmarks
Keith,

Why don't I contact the hypertable guys to see when their next benchmark is planned?

Sent from my iPhone

On Feb 13, 2012, at 6:23 PM, Keith Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I would be interested in working w/ someone on this.  Right now I am
> concentrating on getting 1.4 release ready, and that is keeping me
> pretty busy.  After we release 1.4 I may have some time.
>
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Joey Echeverria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I thought I heard Aaron volunteering ;)
>>
>> -Joey
>>
>> On Feb 13, 2012, at 16:58, Keith Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> I think its a good idea, but who is going to take the time to do it?
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Joey Echeverria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> I think benchmarks are interesting and useful, but they're not the whole
>>>> story. If we can collaborate with the Hypertable testing, that'd be best as
>>>> it should avoid getting into a benchmark shoot out where each community
>>>> feels compelled to one-up the other.
>>>>
>>>> -Joey
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Aaron Cordova <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> so .. we all know that benchmarks can be misleading but ...
>>>>>
>>>>> There seems to be some excitement surrounding the recent Hypertable vs
>>>>> Hbase benchmark, particularly because hbase (0.90) failed to complete some
>>>>> tests, and because the tests seem to be based on those outlined in the
>>>>> original BigTable paper.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hypertable has stated (on Twitter) that they're going to re-run the
>>>>> benchmark on Hbase 0.92, and that they hope for participation from Hbase. I
>>>>> wondered whether it would be in the Accumulo community's interest to
>>>>> participate as well?
>>>>>
>>>>> I believe that because Accumulo uses native management of memory for it's
>>>>> ingest operations that it won't have the same problem Hbase 0.90 did with
>>>>> the tests involving lots of small (10k and 100k) inserts. We know that
>>>>> Accumulo stands apart somewhat because of it's unique features, but
>>>>> performance could be an important differentiator too, or at least should not
>>>>> be a weakness ...
>>>>>
>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>>
>>>>> Aaron
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Joseph Echeverria
>>>> Cloudera, Inc.
>>>> 443.305.9434
>>>>