Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Hadoop, mail # dev - RE: [Vote] Merge branch-trunk-win to trunk


Copy link to this message
-
Re: [Vote] Merge branch-trunk-win to trunk
Matt Foley 2013-03-05, 01:49
Added to the Jira to modify http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToContribute to
document this decision.
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Harsh J <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Thanks Suresh. Regarding where; we can state it on
> http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToContribute in the test-patch
> section perhaps.
>
> +1 on the merge.
>
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:39 PM, Suresh Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Harsh J <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Have we agreed (and stated it somewhere proper) that a -1 obtained for
> >> a Windows CI build for a test-patch will not block the ongoing work
> >> (unless it is Windows specific) and patches may still be committed to
> >> trunk despite that?
> >>
> >
> > This thread is long and possibly hard to follow. Yes, I and several
> others
> > have
> > stated that for now it is okay to commit even if Windows precommit build
> > posts -1.
> >
> >>
> >> I'm +1 if someone can assert and add the above into the formal
> >> guidelines. I'd still prefer that Windows does its releases separately
> >> as that ensures more quality for its audience and better testing
> >> periods (and wouldn't block anything), but we can come to that iff we
> >> are unable to maintain the currently proposed model.
> >
> >
> > Which do you think is the right place to add this?
> >
> > At this time we are voting for merging into trunk. I prefer having a
> single
> > release
> > that supports both Linux and windows. Based on working on Windows support
> > I think this is doable and should not hold up releases for Linux.
>
>
>
> --
> Harsh J
>