Recent email on general@ from Roy Fielding lead me to worry that we're
about to stick out heads up and get shot at, based on "native libs for
linux present", but maybe I need to go look at the package.
The 'release', formally speaking, needs to not contain any binary
items at all. The convenience binary package that we happen to provide
can contain them, but the vote, formally speaking, is only about the
source, and the source can't contain binaries.
Apologies for my laziness, but I thought it was better to put up this
warning than to be silent in the absence of time to look for myself.
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Keith Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * hashes and sigs are good
> * documentation generated properly
> * native libs for linux present
> * simple test run fine
> * tested upgrading from 1.3.5 release to 1.4.0 RC6 and that worked great
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Eric Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Accumulo version
>> The src tar ball was generated by exporting :
>> To build the dist tar ball from the source run the following command :
>> Tarballs, checksums, signatures:
>> Maven Staged Repository:
>> SVN tag:
>> The vote will be held open for the next 72 hours.
>> * Fixed example configurations
>> * Fixed infrastructure links for graduation