Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
HBase, mail # dev - Default JDK settings for Jenkins projects


Copy link to this message
-
Re: Default JDK settings for Jenkins projects
lars hofhansl 2013-12-09, 22:55
Maybe for 0.94 we should do both after all.
There will be installations out there with JDK 6 and we should make sure we do not break anything there.

I'll set up an additional full build for 0.94 based on JDK 7.

-- Lars

________________________________
 From: Jean-Marc Spaggiari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 9, 2013 4:01 AM
Subject: Re: Default JDK settings for Jenkins projects
 

So if we move 0.94 in JDK 7, I guess we all agree there is no reason to
keep trunk in JDK 6, right? Then we should all allign to JFK 7?

JM

2013/12/8 lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> JDK 6 was EOL'd Feb 2013. Even premium support runs out this month.
> Apparently there is an extended support option until Dec 2016.
>
> Not sure who in their right mind would run a production system on JDK 6
> going forward. Even we (Salesforce) switched wholesales to JDK 7 (including
> HBase 0.94), and we're extremely conservative due to the uptime sensitive
> nature of our service.
>
>
> We should switch the 0.94 builds over to JDK 7.
> Unless I hear strong/good reasons I'll do that and see what fails and then
> fix the issues.
>
> -- Lars
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>  From: Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, December 8, 2013 5:52 PM
> Subject: Re: Default JDK settings for Jenkins projects
>
>
> There're several test failures when running 0.94 test suite using jdk 1.7
>
> So there is some work to be done before switching to jdk 1.7 for 0.94
>
> Cheers
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > wrote:
>
> > Make sens to have trunk with JDK 7 too... But I'm not sure for 0.94...
> It's
> > mainly running in prod with JDK 6. So not sure we can align them all...
> >
> >
> > 2013/12/8 Andrew Purtell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > > I think all builds should be running JDK 7. I don't want to be only
> > chasing
> > > JDK 7 related test issues on the 0.98 build alone.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I agree. We should build 0.98 against JDK 7 instead of 6. JDK 6 End
> of
> > > > Public Updates since to February 2013. 0.98 is planned for 2014. Will
> > be
> > > a
> > > > year after that. So I think it's time to move to JDK 7.
> > > >
> > > > My opinion ;)
> > > >
> > > > JM
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2013/12/8 Andrew Purtell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >
> > > > > I was looking for differences between the trunk and 0.98 builds
> since
> > > > > Jenkins projects for the former are passing while the latter are
> not.
> > > > Seems
> > > > > the trunk jobs are set up to use "JDK 1.6 (latest)" while the 0.98
> > > builds
> > > > > are set up to use "JDK 1.7 (latest)". For the time being I have set
> > the
> > > > > 0.98 builds to also use JDK 6 to see if their results will mirror
> > trunk
> > > > > afterward.
> > > > >
> > > > > However, I think we should be using JDK 7 or OpenJDK 7 to run all
> of
> > > our
> > > > > builds 0.96+. What do you think?
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Best regards,
> > > > >
> > > > >    - Andy
> > > > >
> > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> > > Hein
> > > > > (via Tom White)
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > >    - Andy
> > >
> > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> Hein
> > > (via Tom White)
> > >
> >
>