Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
Hadoop >> mail # general >> [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x


+
Arun C Murthy 2012-03-20, 00:13
+
Lars Francke 2012-03-20, 16:10
+
guoshunxu 2012-03-22, 14:25
+
Roman Shaposhnik 2012-03-20, 00:23
+
Arun C Murthy 2012-03-20, 00:34
+
Shaneal Manek 2012-03-20, 00:41
+
Brock Noland 2012-03-20, 00:44
+
Todd Lipcon 2012-03-20, 00:50
+
Eli Collins 2012-03-20, 00:55
+
Kihwal Lee 2012-03-20, 01:22
+
Giridharan Kesavan 2012-03-20, 20:25
+
Ahmed Radwan 2012-03-20, 18:33
+
Jonathan Eagles 2012-03-20, 21:51
+
James Warren 2012-03-20, 18:24
+
Tom White 2012-03-23, 04:33
+
Matt Foley 2012-03-23, 05:34
+
Ted Yu 2012-03-22, 19:51
+
Arun C Murthy 2012-03-20, 01:03
+
Konstantin Boudnik 2012-03-22, 19:49
+
Haruyasu Ueda 2012-03-23, 01:02
+
Jagane Sundar 2012-03-22, 20:34
+
Eric Baldeschwieler 2012-03-20, 05:15
+
Todd Papaioannou 2012-03-20, 06:02
+
Sharad Agarwal 2012-03-21, 04:43
+
Benoy Antony 2012-03-22, 17:31
+
Arun C Murthy 2012-03-20, 01:06
+
Daryn Sharp 2012-03-20, 17:14
+
Enis Söztutar 2012-03-20, 18:15
+
Jason Lowe 2012-03-20, 16:37
+
Hitesh Shah 2012-03-20, 16:19
+
Adam Faris 2012-03-20, 15:07
+
Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli 2012-03-21, 17:09
+
Uma Maheswara Rao G 2012-03-21, 15:04
Copy link to this message
-
Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
My vote is 3, 2

Thanks.

Alejandro

On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Uma Maheswara Rao G
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> My vote:
>   3, 1, 2
>
> Regards,
> Uma
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Arun C Murthy [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 6:36 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
>
> We've discussed several options:
>
> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a
> hole.
> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2
> months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone
> discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
>
> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
>
> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
>
> My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding).
>
> The vote will run the normal 7 days.
>
> thanks,
> Arun
>
> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
>
+
Konstantin Shvachko 2012-03-22, 08:56
+
M. C. Srivas 2012-03-22, 14:27
+
Marcos Ortiz 2012-03-23, 15:28
+
Eric Yang 2012-03-27, 04:33
+
Mark Holderbaugh 2012-03-20, 12:55
+
John George 2012-03-20, 14:14
+
Amol Kekre 2012-03-20, 18:56
+
Bruno Mahé 2012-03-20, 22:12
+
Devaraj Das 2012-03-20, 22:07
+
Milind.Bhandarkar@... 2012-03-20, 22:15
+
Dhruba Borthakur 2012-03-20, 23:03
+
Doug Cutting 2012-03-20, 21:53
+
Patrick Hunt 2012-03-20, 21:33
+
Arpit Gupta 2012-03-21, 18:46
+
Nathan Roberts 2012-03-20, 16:35
+
Aaron T. Myers 2012-03-22, 22:46
+
Fomenko Anatoli 2012-03-23, 00:33
+
Jitendra Pandey 2012-03-20, 06:58
+
Todd Lipcon 2012-03-20, 01:11
+
sanjay Radia 2012-03-20, 04:15
+
Eli Collins 2012-03-20, 04:45
+
Jun Ping Du 2012-03-20, 05:04
+
Tsz Wo Sze 2012-03-20, 02:25
+
Mahadev Konar 2012-03-20, 04:49
+
Shaneal Manek 2012-03-20, 02:38
+
Suresh Srinivas 2012-03-20, 01:58
+
Luke Lu 2012-03-20, 01:35
+
Owen OMalley 2012-03-20, 01:34
+
Konstantin Shvachko 2012-03-20, 06:34
+
Arun C Murthy 2012-03-20, 11:10
+
Joep Rottinghuis 2012-03-21, 04:01
+
Robert Evans 2012-03-20, 16:05
+
Thomas Graves 2012-03-20, 15:46
+
Kihwal Lee 2012-03-21, 13:58
+
Amareshwari Sri Ramadasu 2012-03-21, 04:29
+
Palaniappan, Kumar 2012-03-20, 23:39
+
Mayank Bansal 2012-03-21, 00:02