lars hofhansl 2013-03-15, 18:46
Stack 2013-03-15, 19:11
Ted Yu 2013-03-15, 19:14
-Re: 0.94 automated tests
lars hofhansl 2013-03-16, 01:36
I don't think so.
Let's be smart about this; we can look at a patch and see whether we need a full test run or not.
From: Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 12:14 PM
Subject: Re: 0.94 automated tests
In case of patch that only involves changes to test(s), such as HBASE-8106,
is full test run required ?
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think that fine for getting something into our current 'stable' offering.
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 11:46 AM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ubuntu 3 is currently down. It used to be our most reliable test
> > environment.
> > Until that is fixed I would like to propose requiring a full test run
> > before anything is committed to 0.94.
> > Comments/Concerns? This is pretty annoying, but I do not see any way
> > around this.
> > -- Lars
ramkrishna vasudevan 2013-03-16, 09:07