you should be able to do what you want to do.
It looks like a naming mismatch, but somehow the names are odd.
Can you DESCRIBE the relations that you want to cogroup?
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 01:20, Mohit Anchlia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am I doing something wrong or is this just the limitation? Basically I
> want to group 2 sets into one and locate them in the same row.
> grunt> NM_CT_ST_FILTER = FILTER A by (FIELD_ID == 'NAM2' OR FIELD_ID => 'CITY' OR FIELD_ID == 'ST' OR FIELD_ID == 'ZIP');
> grunt> AG_OC_MT_FILTER = FILTER A by (FIELD_ID == 'AGE' OR FIELD_ID => 'OCCUP' OR FIELD_ID == 'MARITAL') AND FORM_ID == 'FPERSWKS' AND
> FORM_COPY_NUM == '1';
> grunt> NM_CT_ST = JOIN NM_CT_ST_FILTER BY (FILE_NAME,CREATED_DATE), D BY
> grunt> AG_OC_MT = JOIN AG_OC_MT_FILTER BY
> (FILE_NAME,CREATED_DATE,FORM_ID,FORM_ID_ROOT), D BY
> grunt> FINAL = COGROUP NM_CT_ST BY (FILE_NAME,CREATED_DATE), AG_OC_MT BY
> 2012-04-11 16:11:34,205 [main] ERROR org.apache.pig.tools.grunt.Grunt -
> ERROR 1025: Found more than one match: NM_CT_ST_FILTER::FILE_NAME,
> Details at logfile: /home/hadoop/pigtest/pig_1334185845048.log